Natural Alternatives to

Replace Flu Shots

Keywords: children immunization, child immunization, childhood immunization, health immunization, information about vaccination, vaccine programs, immunization risks, vaccination dangers.

Halloween Special

Shock vaccine study: 

influenza vaccines prevent flu in only 1.5% of adults

(not 60% as told)

Nathan Batalion, Global Health Activist, Healingtalks Editor

(Healingtalks) This article is about something quite scary to mention, unless everyone was aware of the vast corruption of consciousness in modern mega-$-generating medicine – what is so systemic.

A recent study published in Lancet shows that their very best and contrived, manipulated, industry-supporting study only could show that influenza vaccines helped just 1.5% of adults – maybe- and via something almost statistically insignificant. Nevertheless, the  very same study is being broadcast throughout mainstream media  as proof that “flu vaccines are 60% effective!”  Supposedly this was a disappointment because the previous claims were for 70-90% effectiveness. See references for such false and widespread industry reporting at the end of this article. So what else is new. The unbridled manipulation of truth is commonplace but remains VERY VERY SCARY indeed.

Flu vaccine stops influenza for just and only 1.5%…..maybe!

In this study the control group of adults consisted of about 13,000 non-vaccinated adults.

Only 2.7% of these caught the flu.

The treatment group were vaccinated with  trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine.

1.2% of them did not catch the flu.

The difference is, using simple math, just 1.5%

Statistical Games

But if you take the 2.7% in the control group and you divide that into the 1.2% in the treatment group, this gives you 0.43 and implies a “57% decrease” in influenza infections. The overall “60% effectiveness” being claimed for this study is thus a statistical hoax and sham. Actually 1.5% of the patients had any incrementally positive response, and even that is disputable.  So when the media (or your doctor) says these vaccines are “60% effective,” what they don’t tell you  is that when you inject 100 adults the result is that only  1.5 of them somehow avoid the flu and it has no positive impact on the rest, or 98.5% of the time and for the general population.

Any harmed by influenza shots, mammograms and chemotherapy? A similar story of a devilish manipulation of truth

Harmful effects are also not the focus, almost never, of such product-marketing, pro-industry studies, funded by Big-Pharma supporting groups to make their bankrupt case.So if we guess, for example, that 7.5% show long-term neurological side effects – a quite reasonable guess given the vast data we have about such harmful impacts – or 5 times as many hurt as helped – then this would mean we all are 500% more likely to be harmed than healed by submitting to the shot!

The same is true with mammograms that harm approximately 10 women for every 1 they may help (http://www.naturalnews.com/020829.html).

It is the same with chemotherapy with a best, and disputable, track record of helping 3% of those treated and failing with the other 97%. And again the successful cases are disputable. Just because a tumor shrinks doesn’t mean someone is truly healed. Chemotherapy may shrink tumors, receiving ovations, while eventually the patient dies because same toxic and lethal chemo tends to kill most who receive it.

“Cancer survivors” after chemotherapy might better be described as “chemo survivors.”

The rest we may bless with R.I.P.s, may they “rest in peace” having been subjected to the cancer industry’s RIP offs.

Quoth the Raven Never More

According to the same study, 12 out of 100 children were helped. But this data is almost certainly largely falsified in favor of the vaccine industry, as explained below. It ignores frightening harms, including a MAJOR vaccine/autism link.

So if you are thinking of giving your child a flu shot, remember Edgar Allen Poe’s admonition – “Quoth the Raven Never More!

Funding

The funding for this abysmal study came from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation whose Vice President for Human Resources and Program Management is Gail Pesyna, a former DuPont executive (working for the second largest GMO firm) and with special expertise in pharmaceuticals and medical diagnostics. (http://www.sloan.org/bio/item/10)

Alred P. Sloan Foundation alsgave a $650,000 grant to fund the creation of a film called “Shots in the Dark: The Wayward Search for an AIDS Vaccine,” (http://www.sloan.org/assets/files/a…) which features a highly pro-vaccine slant.

Credibility

Control group was often given a vaccine, too

In many of the studies used in this meta analysis, the “control” groups were given so-called “insert” vaccines which may have contained chemical adjuvants and other additives but not attenuated viruses. Why does this matter? Because the adjuvants can cause immune system disorders that make the control group more susceptible to influenza.

Flu vaccines not tested against never-vaccinated healthy children

Testing healthy, non-vaccinated children against vaccinated children is something that is never done. It’s no surprise, therefore, that flu shots were simply not tested against “never vaccinated” children who have avoided flu shots for their entire lives. That would be a real test, huh? But of course you will never see that test conducted because it would make flu shots look laughably useless by comparison.

Influenza vaccines not tested against vitamin D user

Vitamin D prevents influenza at a rate that is 8 times more effective than flu shots (http://www.naturalnews.com/029760_v…).

No long-term studies

Vaccines are considered “effective” if they merely prevent the flu. But what if they also cause a 50% increase in Alzheimer’s two decades later?  There is no desire in the industry to observe and record the actual long-term results of vaccines because the negative results would defeat their marketing purposes.

Lancet is a pro-vaccine mouthpiece funded by the vaccine industry!

Trusting The Lancet to report on the effectiveness of vaccines is foolish. Does anyone really think we’re going to get a truthful report from a medical journal that depends on vaccine company revenues?

Even when pro-vaccine medical journals publish pro-vaccine studies, their best data shows flu vaccines prevent influenza in only 1.5 out of 100 adults!

If these studies were done with no $$ ties to Big Pharma, might they have been worse? You betcha. They would probably show a stark negative efficacy rate, meaning that flu shots cause more influenza cases than they prevent. That’s the more likely reality.

Flu shots do cause incidences. That’s why the people who get sick every winter with the flu are often the very same people who got flu shots to prevent the same! Do your own survey and just ask ‘em yourself this coming winter.

Diabolical Beliefs

Thanks to the vast lies of the industry, most people believe flu shots help them, which can alone account for 1.5% less incidences, the power of the mind – again being statistically insignificant.

So next time you see adults lined up at a pharmacy for their flu shots, know that nearly 99 out of those 100 are wasting their time and money and may be subjecting themselves to considerable long-term neurological damage.

Someday may take on the persona of Frankenstein.

Fraudulent marketing

Given this 1.5% effectiveness, the marketing of flu shots is, according to Mike Adams, one of the most outrageous examples of fraudulent marketing ever witnessed in modern or any society.

Can you imagine a car company selling a car that only worked 1.5% of the time? Or a computer company selling a computer that only worked 1.5% of the time? They would be indicted for fraud!

So why does the vaccine industry get away with this?

This puts flu shots in roughly the same efficacy category as rubbing a rabbit’s foot or wishing really hard. But this is commonly what passes for “science” in a greed hungry industry that most maintain billions of dollars in sales to satisfy stockholders.

Trick or Treat

Getting others to buy something useless and that might  harm is quite a trick, not a treat.

How to pull this off? Just shroud the process under  some “science” jargon and offer prizes to the pharmacy workers who cajole customers to get injected. That’s how its done!

Don’t want to know?

What are flu shots really for? Vaccines are population control technologies, as openly admitted by Bill Gates (http://www.naturalnews.com/029911_v…). They are so cleverly packaged under the fabricated “public health” message that even those who administer vaccines have no idea they are actually engaged in the reduction of human population through vaccine-induced infertility and genetic mutations. Vaccines ultimately have but one purpose: to “weed out” those humans who are stupid enough to fall for vaccine propaganda. For that purpose, they probably are 60% effective after all.

Resources

Flu Vaccines — The Mainstream Admits, We Want an Epidemic!
http://liamscheff.com/2011/10/flu-v…

Vaccine Liberation

Related Articles

Say No To Frankencandy On This Halloween

What’s Really Spooky About Halloween

Keywords

symptoms of the flu, flu viruses, vaccines for the flu, flu shot vaccines,  vaccine influenza, effects of the flu,  influenza vaccination, having the flu, flu viruses, flu injection, flu vaccination, cold and flu.

Based on an article by Mike Adams, published at naturalnews.com

Infowars interview on the subject:

Our favorite scary speech by Bill Gates:

SAMPLE MAINSTREAM MEDIA ARTICLE

AHN All Headline News

AOL Healthy Living

MSNBC

Reuters and Yahoo News

Vaccines Cause Autism -

A Proven and

Hushed-Up Fact

Based on an article by by PF Louis, published in Natural News

(Healingtalks) The USA National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) is a crafty and sly federal program to relieve the vaccine industry from financial liability for extreme vaccine injuries. Enough claims have been awarded to indicate our government’s secret awareness of the link between a vaccine and autism while publicly hushing up the fact and denying it.

VICP Background

VICP was created in 1988 to  supposedly “maintain a stable supply of vaccines.” What VICP actuallydoes is help vaccine manufacturers produce vaccines with “stable profits” – not worrying about the very deadly consequences and the huge financial liability that entails Apparently, there was a core dynamic within the federal VICP defending any and all  FDA approvals of vaccines – which generally had little or nothing to do with science but were politically pressured. Then a bomb shell fell on this game when in 2008, the Georgia State Supreme Court issued the following statement:  “There is no evidence that “FDA approval alone renders a vaccine unavoidably safe.”

VICP Develops a Diabolical “Don’t Tell” Policy

So while the federal agencies, industry leaders, and pediatricians (all financially linked together, another truth-telling, eye-opening story) are publicly telling us there is  absolutely and positively “no link of vaccines to autism” (a death knoll for vaccine sales if the public finds out)  a recent study of 83 families with autistic children all  “quietly” awarded  vaccine damages and hush up money by VICP tells a very, very different story. Such awards, and now for over two decades, have included annual annuities to supposedly cover the child’s health expenses over time. But diabolical truth is that this is precisely what keeps the parents from speaking to the media and warning others Again NVIC awards are effectively hush money.According to one parent, Sarah Bridges, PhD, not telling the truth and using “proper semantics” is what helped her win her case. She didn’t use the word autism, though autism destroyed her child.

Autism Award Study

An independent study of NVIC awards was recently published study by Pace Environmental Law Review and it reported that most of the 83 cases awarded did mention autistic behavior and even autism. One such case was awarded after the an intelligent and healthy girl went totally autistic after receiving nine vaccinations in one day! The Pace study, which was not covered by any noteworthy media outlets, had looked into over 1300 cases of brain damage claims from vaccines. So what Sarah Bridges may have implied is that parents have a better chance if they talk seizures, permanent brain damage, etc, while not mentioning autism. Nevertheless, the toothpaste is out of the tube, according to “SafeMinds” Executive Director Lyn Redwood, RN: “This (Pace) study dramatically shifts the debate on autism and vaccines. The question is no longer, can vaccines cause autism? The answer is clear. Now, we have to ask, How many cases of autism have vaccines caused and how do we prevent new injuries from occurring?”

Truth Eventually Leaks Out – Vaccines Definitively Cause Autism

The Safe Minds website has MSM video clips of former heads of major government health agencies who cautiously concede autistic reactions to vaccinations. Apparently it is easier to be truthful after retirement! Robert Kennedy, Jr., a high profile crusader for vaccine safety, has sat in on some vaccine industry board meetings. He angrily asserted that vaccine industry executives are aware of the vaccine toxicity dangers while publicly denying causal connections to autism.

Root Spiritual Problem of Our Times

Time and again, the lure to make money shows up as a most powerfully corrupting force in our culture. Underneath that terrible phenomenon is the deeper drumbeat of our culture, namely  that to gain the very highest and purest knowledge of nature – to raise our consciousness to an objective level and to advance modern civ – we must dominantly mathematize everything around us. This has been the ideology over the past 400 years that is taking us to the brink. This is why physics and chemistry create such a tightest-of-tight marriage with commerce. But the wonderful mathematics we learn from grade school on is very simply  “the set of abstractions for how to separate all elements of consciousness.”  Consciousness is what connects us to the world around us and within. Thus nothing corrupts or undermines that consciousness more than being focused on separation – something we are almost never taught or forewarned about. It counters the philosophy at the root of the Industrial Revolution and the whole transition in the 17th century from the medieval to the modern world.

To be too focused on making money amounts to the same spiritual leadership or lack thereof. It causes such unbelievable extremes of “narrow or separtive conscious focusing” -  wanting to ever not see, not know, not admit the whole truth about matters that otherwise are obvious when the financial bias is removed. Such truth-telling is is not written in this blog to promote an anti-mathematical or anti-commercial philosophy. It is more an issue of what dominates us – what is master and what is servant in our lives. In other words, we can pursue the making of money and the use of certain sciences in a subservient and positive way – keeping the integrity of our consciousness in tact. We just do not try to make money, the $ sign our mountain peak God. If we do, it will time and again corrupt us. No fooling.

Spiritual and Physical Health of Children

We need to all thus be forewarned. Every student on the planet must be taught this and deeply… before being drawn into various financially profitable careers, or of before blindly falling prey to a thousand and one  deceptive traps of our culture. In  our many blog posts, we expose what our culture does not want to expose. These forces are sometimes so extremely diabolical, especially in the “healing arts,” that they terribly harm our most precious children and youngsters. They harm our loved ones. In fact, under the leadership of Big Pharma, chronic ills among children have skyrocketed. Chronic disabilities among children have risen from 1.8% to 6.5%  or more than tripled! And this is the tip of the iceberg.

Sources:

• Money for Vaccine-Autism While Still Denying Link http://healthfreedoms.org/2011/06/1…
• Safe Minds website http://www.safeminds.org/index.html
• Video (Safe Minds): Actual clips of Ex National Health Agency heads fessing up (a little) http://www.youtube.com/watch?featur…
• 2008 Barbara Loe Fisher NVIC co-founder’s article on VICP problems http://vaccineawakening.blogspot.co…
• Video: Sarah Bridges TV interview http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aja4…
• Reporting the Case study http://www.prnewswire.com/news-rele…
• Chronic Disabilities Among Children Triple  http://vran.org/health-risks/anaphylaxis-allergies-and-asthma/chronic-disease-among-children-changes-in-incidence/

Story Behind

Taking Down

Times Square Billboard -

Its Informed

Vaccine Choices

Message

Based on an article by Barbara Loe Fisher

(Healingtalks) It is a short 15 second public service message on the CBS Jumbotron on Times Square in New York City that encourages everyone to make informed vaccine choices. The message is sponsored by the nonprofit charity, the National Vaccine Information Center, and made possible by a donation from Mercola.com. It has been shown hourly since March 22, 2011 alongside much bigger ads for a variety of products marketed by large corporations.¹

American Academy of Pediatrics Strong Arms CBS

On April 13, the President of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) sent a letter to CBS containing misinformation about NVIC in an attempt to strong arm the network into taking the vaccine education message down before it was scheduled to end on April 28. The AAP letter was provided to bloggers,^{2 , 3} who orchestrated an online smear campaign against NVIC and created a petition drive to increase pressure on CBS. Mainstream media outlets like The Guardian in Great Britain republished the AAP’s attack and added more disinformation.⁴

Follow Big Pharma Money

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) is a trade association with 60,000 pediatrician members that publishes guidelines for giving vaccines to children. In recent years, the public has learned that the AAP has been taking lots of money from vaccine manufacturers and refusing to disclose to the media just how much money it gets from Big Pharma.⁵

In the early 1980′s, the AAP lobbied Congress to give pediatricians and drug companies liability protection from vaccine injury lawsuits while parents of DPT vaccine injured children worked hard to get vaccine safety and informed consent provisions in the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986,⁶ which has already paid out more than 2 billion dollars in federal compensation to children and adults harmed by vaccines.⁷ Today, when a pediatrician continues to vaccinate a child after the child has experienced vaccine reactions that get worse after each round of shots, that pediatrician is not held liable in a civil court of law when the child ends up brain damaged or dead because of the pediatrician’s negligence.

AAP: Censoring Vaccine Information

This, together with the fact that in February 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court gave drug companies a bigger shield⁸ from vaccine injury lawsuits – even if the company could have made a safer vaccine – means that the only power Americans have left to protect ourselves from vaccine injury is to arm ourselves with information and defend the legal right to make vaccine choices.⁹ But, clearly, that is getting harder to do when doctors and organizations paid by the pharmaceutical industry are trying to censor vaccine information and block all public conversation about vaccination, while lobbying to take away the human right to informed consent to medical risking taking.^{10 , 11 , 12 , 13}

Dr. Paul Offit: Follow the Money

One of those doctors paid a lot of money by Big Pharma is Dr. Paul Offit.¹⁴ He creates new vaccines and has made a career out of denying vaccine risks and defaming people,^{15 , 16 , 17 , 18} who disagree with his unscientific opinions like his cavalier insistence that it would be safe to give a child 10,000 vaccines at once.¹⁹ He delights in spreading misinformation about parents of vaccine injured children,²⁰ doctors helping those children,²¹ and journalists trying to cover both sides of the vaccine safety debate.

Offit spent a large part of his new book demonizing me and NVIC with the half witted, zealous obsession of a stalker.²² Just this week, a newspaper in Orange County, CA published a retraction²³ for printing Offit’s defamatory accusation that veteran CBS journalist, Sharyl Attkisson, lied when she accurately reported in 2008 that Offit failed to inform CBS about exactly how much money he and his employer, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, are paid by Merck. Merck is the manufacturer and marketer of Vioxx and a whole slew of vaccines, including Offit’s rotavirus vaccine and Gardasil, hepatitis B, chicken pox, shingles and MMR vaccines.²⁴

Doctors Deceptively Demanding We Must Trust Them

Why should we care about influential doctors, who take big money from Big Pharma, and then spend a lot of their time viciously attacking anyone daring to suggest that vaccines and vaccine policies could be made safer?

We should care because doctors don’t just ask but, increasingly, demand that we trust them with our health and the health of our children. Many pediatricians, who are now giving children six dozen doses of 16 vaccines starting on the day of birth,²⁵ throw parents out of their office if they dare to ask too many questions about vaccination or ask for fewer vaccines to be given at once.^{26 , 27 , 28} While the AAP is promoting the idea that every child must live in a “family-centered medical home” so pediatricians can “oversee” children’s health,²⁹ including giving children three times as many vaccinations as children got three decades ago, there are hundreds of new vaccines in the research pipeline.^{30 , 31}

New Vaccines, New Mandates, BIG Profits

How many of these hundreds of new vaccines will be fast tracked by the FDA^{32 , 33} and mandated for children as soon as they are licensed?³⁴ Probably most of them, because that is how drug companies with no liability make big profits – by making sure that every vaccine they make and sell is legally required to be used by every child. And adults are not exempt from the vaccine mandate creep either, just ask American health care workers, who are being fired if they don’t get an annual flu shot,³⁵ as well as lots of other vaccines.

Doctors Should Partner With Parents to Prevent Vaccine Reactions

But what about the children, for whom the risks of vaccination are 100 percent? What about them? Aren’t their lives worth saving, too?

Shouldn’t organizations like the American Academy of Pediatrics be doing everything they can to teach their members about how to be partners with parents in preventing vaccine reactions instead of throwing families out of their offices and attacking organizations like NVIC representing families, whose loved ones have suffered life-altering vaccine reactions?

Thirty years ago, when I took my healthy, precocious two and a half year old son into his pediatrician for his fourth DPT shot, I was told nothing about how to recognize a vaccine reaction. He had experienced an extremely severe local reaction after his third DPT shot but I did not understand the significance of that and neither did my pediatrician. So another DPT shot was given and I watched my child suffer a convulsion, collapse, and experience many hours of unconsciousness shortly after his vaccination and did not realize he was experiencing a brain inflammation that would change his life and mine forever.

Brain Inflammation: From Infections and Vaccines

Brain inflammation³⁶ is one of the most feared complications of vaccination and has been since the first vaccines – smallpox and rabies vaccines – were created and given to humans. ^{37 , 38} Doctors have known for more than a century that brain inflammation,³⁹ whether it is caused by an infection or a vaccination,^{40 , 41 , 42} can cause different kinds of permanent brain dysfunction that ranges from multiple learning disabilities to medication resistant seizure disorders, mental retardation⁴³ and, yes, sometimes can result in a constellation of brain dysfunction symptoms that are labeled by doctors as “autism.” ^{44 , 45}

In the book, DPT: A Shot in the Dark, published a quarter century ago, there are many case histories of children, whose pediatricians did not tell mothers about how to recognize the symptoms of vaccine reactions and those children were revaccinated over and over again until they were permanently brain damaged or died.⁴⁶ A number of these children came from families with strong medical histories of allergy and autoimmunity, like my family,⁴⁷ which the pediatricians dismissed as unimportant.

Writing Off Vaccine Reaction Symptoms Is Dangerous

Too often doctors today – just like doctors back in the 1980′s – are not telling parents about what to look for after vaccines are given. Too many pediatricians today are listening to the advice of Paul Offit^{48 , 49} and, instead of adhering to the precautionary principle, are dangerously writing off symptoms of vaccine reactions as a “coincidence” without having a clue about whether that is true for an individual child.

At the National Vaccine Information Center, where we have been collecting information on vaccine reactions since 1982, it is clear to us that more than 50 percent of all vaccine injuries and deaths could potentially be prevented if doctors and parents were educated about what a vaccine reaction looks like and if pediatricians were much more cautious about re-vaccinating children when a child gets sicker and sicker after each round of shots.^{50, 51 , 52}

Learn How to Make Informed Vaccine Choices

Because your pediatrician may not tell you how to recognize a symptom of a vaccine reaction, you can download the brochure “If You Vaccinate, Ask 8 Questions” from NVIC’s website. It contains a list of vaccine reactions to look for like high pitched screaming and collapse/shock and seizures.⁵³ At NVIC’s website, you can also access vaccine product information published by the vaccine manufacturers and the FDA, as well as do your own research about vaccine reactions reported to the federal government.⁵⁴ You can access a Vaccine Ingredient Calculator that educates you about vaccine components and how to make informed vaccine choices.⁵⁵

And remember, if your child suffers symptoms of marked deterioration in physical, mental or emotional health after vaccination, you need to make sure your pediatrician writes down those symptoms in the child’s permanent medical record.

One Size Vaccine Does Not Fit All

America’s children would be better served if the American Academy of Pediatrics leadership educated its membership about how to be intelligent, compassionate partners with parents in preventing vaccine reactions, injuries and deaths rather than write off symptoms of vaccine reactions as a “coincidence” and bully parents into submitting to one-size-fits-all vaccine policies that are not safe for every single child. People are not all the same and we do not all react the same way to pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines.⁵⁶ Some children are genetically and biologically at higher risk for suffering life-altering vaccine reactions.⁵⁷

Pretending that is not true is both intellectually dishonest and cruel.

No child is expendable and no pediatrician should be encouraged to be a zealous implementer of state vaccine policy first instead of, first, doing no harm.

Click here to read NVIC’s April 25, 2011 Businesswire press release.

Click here to read the April 18, 2011 Letter from Barbara Loe Fisher, President, National Vaccine Information Center, to O. Marion Burton, MD, FAAP, President of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Click here to read the April 18, 2011 Letter from Barbara Loe Fisher, President, NVIC, to Leslie Moonves, President, CBS.

References:

• 1 NVIC. NVIC & Mercola.com on Times Square. NVIC Vaccine E-newsletter March 23, 2011.
• 2 Autism News Beat (an anonymous blogger). AAP asks CBS to pull anti-vaccine ad. April 13, 2011.
• 3 The Skeptical Teacher (aka anonymous blogger mattusmaximus). ALERT: Demand That CBS Not Air Outdoor Anti-Vaccine Ad! April 15, 2011.
• 4 Platt, M. Doctors demand the removal of anti-vaccine ad from Times Square. The Guardian (UK). April 18, 2011.
• 5 Lagorio C. How Independent Are Vaccine Defenders? CBS News. July 25, 2008.
• 6 NVIC. Federal Law – National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986.
• 7 Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: Statistics Report (as of April 4, 2011).
• 8 Supreme Court of the United States. Russell Bruesewitz et al v. Wyeth et al. No. 09-152. Argued October 12, 2010 – Decided February 22, 2011.
• 9 Fisher BL. No Pharma Liability? No Vaccine Mandates. March 2, 2011.
• 10 AAP. State Government Affairs: State Legislation Report 2010. Childhood Immunization Challenges.
• 11 Friedman M. NJ Senate Bill would establish stricter rules on vaccination exemptions citing religious reasons. Star Ledger. March 15, 2011.
• 12 Fisher BL. Vaccines and Individual Rights. Wall Street Journal. January 27, 2007.
• 13 Fisher, BL. WA & NJ Families Stand Up for Vaccine Choices. NVIC Vaccine E-newsletter. March 23, 2011.
• 14 Fagone, J. Will This Doctor Hurt Your Baby? Philadelphia Magazine. March 27, 2009.
• 15 Handley JB. Columbia University Press and Dr. Paul Offit Sued for Autism’s False Prophets. Age of Autism. February 10, 2009.
• 16 . Wallace A. An Epidemic of Fear: One Man’s Battle Against the Anti-VaccineMovement. Wired. November 2009.
• 17 Barbara Loe Arthur (aka Barbara Loe Fisher), Plaintiff v. Paul A. Offit, M.D. et al, Defendants. Civil Action No. 01:09-cv-1398. U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Plaintiff’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss filed Feb. 3, 2010 on behalf of plaintiff by Jonathan W. Emord with Andrea G. Ferrenz, Peter A. Arhangelsky, Christopher K. Niederhauser of Emord & Associates, Counsel for Plaintiff.
• 18 Orange County Register. CORRECTION re: August 4, 2008 article “Dr. Paul Offit Responds.” April 18, 2011.
• 19 Kalb, C. Stomping Through a Medical Minefield. Newsweek Magazine. October 25, 2008.
• 20 Poling J. Letter re: Vaccines and Autism Revisited – The Hannah Poling Case. NEnglJMed 2008; 359:655-565. Aust 7, 2008.
• 21 Offit PA, Moser CA. The Problem with Dr. Bob’s Alternate Vaccine Schedule. Pediatrics 2009; 123: e164-e169.
• 22 Offit P. Deadly Choices: How the Anti-Vaccine Movement Threatens Us All. Basic Books: 2011.
• 23 See Reference #18.
• 24 MerckVaccines.com
• 25 AAP. 2011 Immunization Schedules.
• 26 Cry for Vaccine Freedom Wall.NVIC.
• 27 Kotz D. Flexible Approach to Vaccination Comes Under Fire.U.S. News. December 29, 2008.
• 28 Flanaga-Klygis EA, Sharp E. Frader JE. Dismissing the Family Who Refuses Vaccines: A Study of Pediatrician Attitudes.Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005; 159: 929-934.
• 29 AAP.Medical Home (National Center for Medical Home Implementation).
• 30 U.S. National Institutes of Health.Vaccine Clinical Trials.
• 31 Associated Press. Vaccines market gives pharmaceutical industry a boost. NJ.com. November 17, 2009.
• 32 NVIC. Merck’s Gardasil Vaccine Not Proven Safe for Little Girls. NVIC Press Release: June 27, 2006.
• 33 Computer Sciences Corporation. Case Studies: Regulatory Affairs. Fast Tracking Vaccine Program.
• 34 Zimm A, Preston D. Merck Gets First U.S. Cancer Shot Mandate, From Texas (Update 3). Bloomberg News. February 20, 2007.
• 35 Fisher BL. Forcing Flu Shots on Healthcare Workers: Who Is Next? NVIC. September 10, 2010.
• 36 Merck Manual. Definition of Encephalitis (brain inflammation).
• 37 Altman LK. Smallpox Vaccine Transmission Raises Liability Issue. New York Times. December 16, 2002.
• 38 The Rockefeller University. The Birth of the Concept of Autoimmune Demyelinating Disease and Creation of An Animal Model to Test New Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis. The Rockefeller University Hospital.
• 39 News-Medical.Net. Brain inflammation is a sign of autism. Nov. 15, 2004.
• 40 Gold, R. Pertussis: The Disease & the Vaccine. Canadian Family Physician. Vol 32, January 1986, pp. 79-83.
• 41 Steinman L, Weiss A et al. Pertussis toxin is required for pertussis vaccine encephalopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 1985. December; 82(24) 8733-8736.
• 42 Hofstetter HH, Shive CL, Forsthuber TC. Pertussis Toxin Modulates the Immune Response to Neuroantigens Injected in Incomplete Freund’s Adjuvant: Induction of Th1 Cells and Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis in the Presence of High Frequencies of Th2 Cells. The Journal of Immunology, 2002. 169: 117-125.
• 43 Stratton KR, Howe CJ, Johnston RB. DPT Vaccine and Chronic Nervous System Dysfunction: A New Analysis. Institute of Medicine: National Academy Press. 1994.
• 44 Ashwood P, Wills S, VandeWater J. The immune response in autism: a new frontier for autism research. Journal of Leukocyte Biology 2006; 80: 1-15.
• 45 Fisher BL. Vaccines, Autism & Chronic Inflammation: The New Epidemic. NVIC. 2008.
• 46 Coulter HL, Fisher BL. DPT: A Shot in the Dark. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. 1985.
• 47 Fisher BL. Medical Science & Public Trust: The policy, ethics and law of vaccination in the 20^th & 21^st centuries. Presentation at the Vaccine Safety: Evaluating the Science Conference. January 3, 2011.
• 48 The Colbert Report. Interview with Paul Offit. February 1, 2011.
• 49 Thinking Person’s Guide to Autism. Interview with Paul Offit. January 31, 2011.
• 50 International Memorial for Vaccine Victims. Hepatitis B Vaccine Reaction Report. NVIC.
• 51 Epilepsy.com. Online discussion about seizures after immunizations. April 2005.
• 52 NVIC. Gardasil & The Damage Done: Gabrielle’s Gardasil Vaccine Reaction. December 2008.
• 53 NVIC. If You Vaccinate, Ask 8!
• 54 MedAlerts Vaccine Reaction Database.
• 55 Vaccine Ingredients Calculator.
• 56 National Center for Biotechnology Information. One Size Does Not Fit All.
• 57 PBS NewsHour. Autism Now. Six-Part Series (On Air April 18-25 and online)

Sources:

National Vaccine Information Center April 21, 2011

BusinessWire April 25, 2011

Salon.com April 25, 2011

American Council on Science & Health April 14, 2011

The Guardian April 18, 2011

Keyword tags – vaccine message, complications of vaccination, informed vaccine choices, taking down times square’s billboard

Vaccines:

Get the Full Story

Protecting Your Child

and Yourself

PHYSICIANS SIGNING ONTO THIS REPORT

Nicola Antonucci, MD
Todd M. Elsner, DC
Alexander Kotok, MD, PhD
Máximo Sandín, PhD
David Ayoub, MD
Jorge Esteves, MD
Eneko Landaburu, MD
Len Saputo, MD
Nancy Turner Banks, MD
Edward “Ted” Fogarty, MD
Luc Lemaire, DC
Michael Schachter, MD
Timur Baruti, MD
Jack Forbush, DO
Janet Levatin, MD
Viera Scheibner, PhD
Danny Beard, DC
Milani Gabriele, CRNA, RN
Thomas Levy, MD, JD
Penelope Shar, MD
Françoise Berthoud, MD
Sheila Gibson, MD, BSc
Stephen L’Hommedieu, DC
Bruce Shelton, MD, MD(H)
Russell Blaylock, MD
Mike Godfrey, MBBS
Paul Maher, MD, MPH
Debbi Silverman, MD
Fred Bloem, MD
Isaac Golden, ND
Andrew Maniotis, PhD
Kenneth “KP” Stoller, MD
Laura Bridgman, FNP, ND
Gary Goldman, PhD
Steve Marini, PhD, DC
Terri Su, MD
Kelly Brogan, MD
Garry Gordon, MD, DO, MD(H)
Juan Manuel Martínez Méndez, MD
Didier Tarte, MD
Sarah Buckley, MD
Doug Graham, DC
Sue McIntosh, MD
Leigh Ann Tatnall, RN
Rashid Buttar, DO
Boyd Haley, PhD
Richard Moskowitz, MD
Adiel Tel‐Oren, MD, DC
Harold Buttram, MD
Gayl Hamilton, MD
Sheri Nakken, RN, MA
Sherri Tenpenny, DO
Lisa Cantrell, RN
Linda Hegstrand, MD, PhD
Christiane Northrup, MD
Renee Tocco, DC
Lua Català Ferrer, MD
James Howenstine, MD
Amber Passini, MD
Demetra Vagias, MD, ND
Jennifer Craig, PhD, BSN, MA
Suzanne Humphries, MD
Ronald Peters, MD, MPH
Franco Verzella, MD
Robert Davidson, MD, PhD
Belén Igual Diaz, MD
Jean Pilette, MD
Julian Whitaker, MD
Ana de Leo, MD
Philip Incao, MD
Pat Rattigan, ND
Ronald Whitmont, MD
Carlos de Quero Kops, MD
Joyce Johnson, ND
Zoltan Rona, MD, MSc
Betty Wood, MD
Carolyn Dean, MD, ND
A. Majid Katme, MBBCh, DPM
Chaim Rosenthal, MD
Eduardo Ángel Yahbes, MD
Mayer Eisenstein, MD, JD, MPH
Tedd Koren, DC
Robert Rowen, MD

The above signatories represent a spectrum that includes pediatricians, family physicians, brain surgeons, and professors of pathology, chemistry, biology and immunology. All have independently researched the real science and have come to the conclusions you will read about in this document. MD, DO, MB, MBBCh all indicate a doctor of medicine. ND indicates a medically trained and licensed doctor in some areas. FNP indicates a family nurse practitioner.
Ever wonder why doctors can’t find the cause for many diseases? It’s because they are conditioned to ignore the relationship between illness and vaccines.

Diseases Caused by Vaccinations

These are some of the diseases that have documented associations with vaccines:

• Allergies and eczema
• Arthritis
• Asthma
• Autism
• Acid reflux requiring an infant to take proton pump inhibitors, which have many side effects
• Cancer
• Diabetes (infant and childhood)
• Kidney disease
• Miscarriages
• Long list of neurological and autoimmune diseases
• Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)
• And many, many more

Side Effects Caused By Vaccinations

These are some known vaccine side effects, documented in medical literature and/or in package inserts:

• Arthritis, bleeding disorders, blood clots, heart attacks, sepsis
• Ear infections
• Fainting (with reports of broken bones)
• Kidney failure requiring dialysis
• Seizures/epilepsy
• Severe allergic reactions, such as hives and anaphylaxis
• Sudden death
• Many common diagnoses given for hospital admissions.
• The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, (NVICP) has awarded more than $1.2 billion in damages to children and adults injured by vaccines.

Autism Is Associated With Vaccines

Autism was rare until the mass vaccination programs were accelerated in 1991, with the introduction of the hepatitis B vaccine and the HiB (meningitis) vaccine. Tens of thousands of parents will attest that autism appeared in their children very soon after they were given these, and other, vaccines. Study the information on the website www.fourteenstudies.org. You will find the studies denying the association between autism and vaccines to be highly questionable.

Other Vaccine Facts

• Drug companies, insurance companies and the medical system get rich when you get sick.
• Vaccines do not give life‐long immunity, which means booster shots are recommended.
• Each booster shot increases the risk of more side effects.
• Vaccine side effects can make you sick for the rest of your life. Conveniently, there are many drugs to treat the side effects caused by vaccines.
• In the U.S., neither drug companies nor doctors can be sued when something bad happens from a vaccination. Both are protected by the 1986 National Child Vaccine Injury Act. This law, signed into effect by then‐president Ronald Reagan decreed: “No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine‐related injury or death.”(Public Law 99‐660)

Why Not Get A Vaccine Shot?

Many doctors and health‐care practitioners do not get vaccinated and do not vaccinate their children. Why not?

• They know vaccines are not proven to be safe or effective. They know vaccines contain dangerous substances.
• They know vaccines cause serious health problems
• They have treated patients with serious side effects from vaccines.
• The only people who benefit from being healthy are you and those you care about.

A Story Of Corruption

• Drug companies have infiltrated and seized control over the entire healthcare system, including medical schools, medical journals, hospitals, clinics and the local pharmacy. A doctor’s very livelihood thus depends on blind faith, without questioning any aspect of any vaccination. Even when obvious evidence of vaccine damage occurs right before a doctor’s eyes, s/he is usually unwilling to consider a vaccine as the cause. Though uncorrupt science and medicine support rejection of vaccines, doing so can be considered professional career suicide. The signatories to this document boldly risk this end for the safety of you and your child.
• Hospitals benefit financially from hospitalizations and tests.
• Drug companies make billions of dollars from vaccines.
• Drug companies make tens of billions of dollars from drugs given to treat side effects and life‐time illnesses caused by vaccines.
• Vaccines are the backbone of the medical system. Without vaccines, healthcare costs would go down because we would have a healthier overall society. We have exchanged chicken pox for autism, flu for asthma, ear infections for diabetes. The list goes on and on. In the zeal to eliminate a short list of relatively benign microbes, we have traded temporary illnesses for pervasive, life‐long diseases, disorders, dysfunctions and disabilities.

How Many Vaccines are There?

• If U.S. children receive all doses of all vaccines, they are injected with up to 35 shots that contain 113 different kinds of disease particles, 59 different chemicals, four types of animal cells/DNA, human DNA from aborted fetal tissue and human albumin.
• If you think you don’t have to worry about vaccines because your children are older, think again. There are at least 20 more vaccines currently in the development pipeline for release in the next few years, mostly targeting adolescents and adults.

Some Vaccine Ingredients

How is it possible that vaccines will not be harmful to your health?

• Stray viruses and bacteria from the animal cell cultures that vaccines are made in.
• Mercury, a well‐documented neurotoxin, is still in the multi‐dose flu vaccines throughout the world. Trace amounts remain in several other vaccines.
• Aluminum, a poison that can cause bone, bone marrow and brain degeneration.
• Animal cells from monkeys, dog kidneys, chickens, cows, and humans.
• Formaldehyde (embalming fluid), a known carcinogen.
• Polysorbate 80, known to cause infertility in female mice and testicular atrophy in male mice.
• Gelatin, from pigs and cows, known to cause anaphylactic reactions, is found in large quantities in the MMR, chickenpox and shingles vaccines.
• Monosodium glutamate (MSG) in inhaled flu vaccines, is known to cause metabolic disturbances (e.g. diabetes), seizures and other neurologic disorders.

Conflicts of Interest In The Vaccine Industry

• The same people who make rules and recommendations about vaccination profit from vaccine sales. For example, Dr. Julie Gerberding, who was in charge of the CDC for eight years, is now the President of Merck Vaccines. Dr. Paul Offit, a member of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice(ACIP), developed and patented his own vaccine.
• According to the CDC, the average U.S. 10‐doctor pediatric group has over $100,000 of vaccine inventory in their office to sell. These doctors make money from office visits and from giving your children vaccines, and also from follow up office visits for assessing reactions.
• U.S. pediatricians reportedly make quarterly bonuses from the HMOs they work for by maintaining high vaccination rates in their practices and have reportedly been reprimanded by insurance companies if their vaccination rates fall.

Vaccine Research

Is there any research that shows the difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated children?

• The Cal‐Oregon project sponsored by Generation Rescue surveyed parents of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated U.S. children. Of the 17,674 children included in the survey, the results showed:
• Vaccinated children had 120% more asthma.
• Vaccinated boys had 317% more ADHD.
• Vaccinated boys had 185% more neurologic disorders.
• Vaccinated boys had 146% more autism.
• Girls represented only 20% of the total number of children in the survey. To read the full study for yourself, go to www.generationrescue.org/pdf/survey.pdf. To read a report on the low incidence of autism among unvaccinated Amish children go to http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/quick‐compare‐2. More studies on autism are found here http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/japvaxautism/ and here http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2010/02/08/britvaxautism/

Vaccine Exemptions And Options In The U.S

• You do have the right to refuse. Use it.
• Your child does not have to be vaccinated to attend public school.
• Every state has exemptions giving you the right to refuse unwanted vaccines. http://exemptmychild.com/10752
• Find a healthcare provider who agrees with your choice to not vaccinate and will respect you at www.vaccinationcouncil.org/providers.pdf
• Many choose health and safety by saying no to vaccines.
• Groups that generally do not vaccinate include holistic practitioners, chiropractors, parents who home school, and those who belong to certain religions.
• Thousands of testimonies written by parents of non‐vaccinated children about the state of their children’s robust health are available many places online.
• Vaccination decisions are between you and your spouse/partner. No one else needs to know. It is not the business of your family members, your neighbors, or your in‐laws.
• To have vibrant health, you will need to take the initiative to learn some new things. The safe choice is to say no to vaccines. You have control over health choices you make for yourself and your children. You have no control over the outcome of a vaccination.
• You do not need a pediatrician to simply weigh and measure your child and give shots. Consider a naturopathic doctor, a pediatric chiropractor, a doctor of oriental medicine, or a homeopathic doctor. You may find that family doctors of osteopathic medicine are more open‐minded about vaccine‐free choices. Babies are born with powerful, natural defenses. If this were not so, all would die shortly after birth. Enormous cascades of complex immune processes start with the first cry. This needs to occur naturally, without the interruption caused by the injections of toxic substances.
• Learn about the “vaccine preventable” diseases. Your children will never come in contact with most of them and if they do, nearly all healthy and unvaccinated children recover uneventfully, with long term immunity. Health cannot come through a needle.
• Learn about the importance of fever, how to take care of it at home and when it is time to call the doctor. Most fevers resolve on their own, with care and support, in just a few hours. www.drtenpenny.com/fever.aspx
• Understand that your child can be vaccinated and still contract the illness you are wishing to prevent. Vaccines may not provide the protection that people assume they do. Health cannot come through a needle.
• Learn that the primary keys to health are good nutrition, pure water, adequate sleep, routine exercise and happiness.
• Learn some simple information about vitamins, especially the critically important information about vitamin D3. Learn how to use basic herbs and basic homeopathy for health and for addressing minor illnesses.
• Learn more than your doctor about vaccines. Your medical doctor has probably never read anything about vaccines except drug‐company and CDC‐sponsored publications that support their use.
• Know that healthcare is something you pay for; sick care is covered by insurance. Your insurance will pay for drugs and vaccines. Budget accordingly to stay healthy. Your life depends on it.

Web Resources On Vaccination

• International Medical Council on vaccination (free webinars) www.vaccinationcouncil.org
• Example IMCV regional sites www.imcv‐wi.org, www.imcv‐me.org
• Dr. Sherri Tenpenny www.drtenpenny.com, Facebook www.facebook.com/vaccineinfo
• ThinkTwice Global Vaccine Institute www.thinktwice.com
• Vaccination Liberation www.vaclib.org
• U.S. doctors who don’t vaccinate www.novaxdoctors.webs.com
• Holistic Moms www.holisticmoms.org
• Moms Like Me www.momslikeme.com
• Books for more information and a place to start
• Saying No To Vaccines – Sherri Tenpenny, DO
• Make an Informed Vaccine Decision For the Health of Your Child – Mayer Eisenstein, MD, JD, MPH
• Vaccines: Are They Really Safe and Effective? – Neil Miller
• Child Health Guide – Randall Neustaedter
• Childhood Vaccinations: Questions All Parents Should Ask – Tedd Koren, DC
• How to Raise a Healthy Child in Spite of Your Doctor – Robert Mendelsohn, MD
• Jabs, Jenner and Juggernauts – Jennifer Craig, PhD, BSN, MA, Dhom
• Natural Alternatives to Vaccination – Zoltan Rona, MD
• The Crime of Vaccination – Tenison Deane, MD
• The Sanctity of Human Blood: Vaccination is Not Immunization – Tim O’Shea, DC
• Vaccination – Gerhard Buchwald, MD
• Vaccination: 100 Years of Orthodox Research – Viera Scheibner, PhD
• Medical doctors(MD,DO, 4yr ND), Doctors of Chiropractic, health care workers who work in a conventional setting, and holistic practitioners wishing to participate in future versions of this document or who would like to join our group, please send an e‐mail to sayno@vaccinationcouncil.org
• International Medical Council on Vaccination www.vaccinationcouncil.org www.facebook.com/vaccinationcouncil

Nations requiring the most vaccines tend to have the worst infant mortality rates

by Neil Z. Miller

A new study, published in Human and Experimental Toxicology (http://het.sagepub.com/content/earl…), a peer-reviewed journal indexed by the National Library of Medicine, found that nations with higher (worse) infant mortality rates tend to give their infants more vaccine doses.

Example Of This Correlation

For example, the United States requires infants to receive 26 vaccines — the most in the world — yet more than six U.S. infants die per every 1000 live births. In contrast, Sweden and Japan administer 12 vaccines to infants, the least amount, and report less than three deaths per 1000 live births.

Infant Mortality Study Protocols

The authors of the study, Neil Z. Miller and Dr. Gary Goldman, conducted a literature review to determine the immunization schedules for the United States and all 33 nations with better infant mortality rates than the United States. The total number of vaccine doses specified for infants aged less than one year was then determined for each country. The 34 nations were then organized into data pairs consisting of total number of vaccine doses specified for their infants and infant mortality rates. A scatter plot of the data pairs provided evidence of a positive correlation: infant mortality rates and vaccine doses tend to increase together.

Nations were also grouped into five different vaccine dose ranges. The mean infant mortality rates of all nations within each group were then calculated. Analysis showed “a high statistically significant correlation between increasing number of vaccine doses and increasing infant mortality rates.”

“Positive” Correlation

It is instructive to note that many developing nations require their infants to receive multiple vaccine doses and have national vaccine coverage rates (a percentage of the target population that has been vaccinated) of 90% or better, yet their infant mortality rates are poor. Infant mortality rates will remain high in nations that cannot provide clean water, proper nutrition, improved sanitation, and better access to health care.

Nations with higher (worse) infant mortality rates give their infants, on average, more vaccine doses. This positive correlation, derived from the data, elicits an important inquiry: Are some infant deaths associated with over-vaccination? Is it possible that some nations are requiring too many vaccines for their infants and the additional vaccines are a toxic burden on their health?

Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS):

There is some evidence that a subset of infants may be more susceptible to SIDS shortly after being vaccinated. For example, Torch found that unvaccinated babies who died of SIDS did so most often in the fall or winter while vaccinated babies died most often at 2 and 4 months — the same ages when initial doses of DPT were given to infants. He concluded that DPT “may be a generally unrecognized major cause of sudden infant and early childhood death, and that the risks of immunization may outweigh its potential benefits.” It appears as though some infant deaths attributed to SIDS may be vaccine related, perhaps associated with biochemical or synergistic toxicity due to over-vaccination.

All nations have an obligation to determine whether their immunization schedules are achieving their desired goals.

You may download the complete study at: http://het.sagepub.com/content/earl…

Funding Acknowledgment: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Open Access: The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) donated $2500 and Michael Belkin donated $500 (in memory of his daughter, Lyla) for open access to the journal article (making it freely available to all researchers). NVIC is dedicated to preventing vaccine injuries and deaths through public education.
Neil Z. Miller is an independent researcher. He has devoted the last 25 years to educating parents and health practitioners about vaccines, encouraging informed consent and non-mandatory laws. Mr. Miller gives talks on vaccines both locally and nationally. Past organizations that he has lectured for include the International Chiropractic Pediatric Association, the International College of Integrative Medicine, Autism One/Generation Rescue, the Hahnemann Academy of North America, and the University of Virginia. In June 2011, Mr. Miller will be giving a vaccine seminar at Dr. Gabriel Cousens’ Tree of Life Rejuvenation Center. Mr. Miller has a degree in psychology and is a member of Mensa. Contact information:Neil Z. Miller

UK Finally Makes Smart Decision to Protect Children…

Why Doesn’t the US?

Posted By Dr. Mercola 

Sources:

Vaccine Truth December 31, 2010

Mail Online December 31, 2010

Murdoch’s Worst Crimes

By William Newton Special to Salem-News.com

“… the evidence of sleazy and scandalous behavior of the Murdoch papers has expanded geometrically.” Michael Collins

(LONDON) – Rupert Murdoch’s news empire faces intense media and legal scrutiny.

Current revelations focus on Murdoch’s News of the World hacking into the Dowler family’s voice messages during the kidnapping case their 12 year old daughter Milly, and Murdoch’s London Times’ allegedly having illegally obtained the financial, property and medical information of former UK Labour Party Leader Gordon Brown during the time he was chancellor. BBC – “Gordon Brown ‘targeted’ by Sunday Times” Murdoch’s Last Pillar of Legitimacy Crumbles. A 2010 exposure of Murdoch’s Times of London revealed that it had published forged documents purporting to show that Iran planned to do nuclear experiments for an atomic weapon, and as Michael Collins at Oped News points out, it was Murdoch’s “drumbeat of misinformation” that helped mislead people into believing that Saddam Hussein was involved in the 9/11 attack, supporting Bush’s invasion of Iraq, though intelligence was “unsubstantiated, contradicted, or even non-existent.” Senate Intelligence Committee Unveils Final Phase II Reports on Prewar Iraq Intelligence June 5, 2008

But what has not yet been covered is the media circus Murdoch’s London Times created internationally as it fabricated lies against a respected British doctor, with consequences that could impact the lives of billions of children in the world.

The London Time’s headlines read:

Callous, unethical and dishonest’: Dr Andrew Wakefield

MMR scare doctor Andrew Wakefield makes fortune in US.

Andrew Wakefield MMR – the investigation – by Brian Deer

London Times : MMR doctor Andrew Wakefield ‘abused his position of trust.’

Andrew Wakefield was a respected British gastroenterologist who began research into digestive problems in autistic children in collaboration with other doctors in the UK, after being called by parents seeking help.  His work indicated severe digestive issues and he asked for more investigation of the MMR vaccine.

Brian Deer is the reporter who savaged Dr Wakefield from the pages of the Sunday Times, a paper managed by Rupert Murdoch’s son James Murdoch who is on the board of GlaxoSmithKline which makes the MMR.  Deer researched his case with the help of Medico-Legal Investigations a private enquiry company whose only source of funding is the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry.  Deer was both the  journalist writing on Wakefield and the person to bring a case of fitness to practice medicine to the General Medical Council, and then wrote about the proceedings as well.   Parents whose children were treated by Wakefield were denied the right to be heard before a real court on claims against the vaccine manufacturers.  The High Court judge who denied them was Sir Nigel Davis, whose brother is an executive board member of Elsevier, publishers of the Lancet which removed Wakefield’s paper on the subject, published in 1998, and is on the Board of GlaxoSmithKline.

With the London Times given Brian Deer free reign to attack Wakefield, media closed in like shark.  Coincidentally, the head of Reuters serves on the Board of Merck, and Miriam Stoppard who writes at the Daily Mirror Newspaper is married to Sir Christopher Hogg, who was Chairman of GlaxoSmith Kline un 2004.  Dr Kumar, the Chairman of the GMC Fitness to Practice Panel who ruled against Dr Andrew Wakefield, would not answer questions about his shareholdings in GlaxoSmithKline, and said there was no such thing as vaccine damage as well as saying that any parents who claimed that their children had suffered such, would be treated with scorn and contempt

Wakefield lost his license to practice and left the UK.  What had he done that Murdoch’s machine went into action, creating fictions about him, getting his work pulled from the Lancet, getting him brought before the GMC to ultimately lose his license?  Wakefield suggested that until further studies, that the measles vaccine be given as a separate vaccine rather than in combination as the MMR (measles, Mumps, Rubella).  He did not suggest that children not take a measles vaccine, only that there be caution until the MMR was investigate further. This reasonable suggestion was met immediately by the single measles vaccines being taken off the market.

Wakefield’s work with Professor Walker-Smith and Professor Simon Murch had touched a nerve.  The pharmaceutical industry, an industry that makes 6 times more than any industry on Wall Street is heavily invested in vaccines (in the US, the companies do not have to prove any efficacy to get FDA approval) and is moving on every front to have their product mandated.  To suggest the one of the main vaccines for children might be destroying them mentally and physiologically was a problem, yet the study showed severe digestive system damage and mitochondrial dysfunction.  Mitochondrial dysfunction has been confirmed by other studies but taking down Wakefield in a big way became a means of discrediting anyone questioning vaccines.  Wakefield was cast as a fraud and so all those voicing concerns were dismissed by reference to him.

This documentary gives background and can allow people to judge the credibility of Murdoch’s reporter for themselves.  http://www.naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=21C9E60E7A00D3D8B3DF37796B661886

To understand how serious all this is, and thus how much is at stake for millions if not billions of children, one need to appreciate how profound it is for mitochondria not to function normally.

“Children with autism are far more likely to have deficits in their ability to produce cellular energy than are typically developing children, a new study by researchers at UC Davis has found. The study, published in theJournal of the American Medical Association(JAMA), found that cumulative damage and oxidative stress in mitochondria, the cell’s energy producer, could influence both the onset and severity of autism, suggesting a strong link between autism and mitochondrial defects.  …. Mitochondria are the primary source of energy production in cells and carry their own set of genetic instructions, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), to carry out aerobic respiration. Dysfunction in mitochondria already is associated with a number of other neurological conditions, including Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, schizophrenia ….”  http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/11/101130161521.htm

Mitochondrial disorders may be caused by mutations, acquired or inherited, in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) or in nuclear genes that code for mitochondrial components. They may also be the result of acquired mitochondrial dysfunction due to adverse effects of drugs, infections, or other environmental causes (see MeSH). … Defects in nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes are associated with hundreds of clinical disease phenotypes including anemia, dementia, hypertension, lymphoma, retinopathy, seizures, and neurodevelopmental disorders.[2]  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_disease#Characteristics

In opening up the issue mitochrondrial dysfunction and urging a shift back to a single measles vaccine (an earlier vaccine), Wakefield may have stumbled onto something explosive.  For the MMR vaccine appears to be the third generation of vaccines, what are called DNA vaccines. They involve shooting genetically engineered material into the body, often using gene guns that were used into the genetic engineering of seeds, in order to achieve DNA “uptake.”

From Wikipedia on DNA Vaccines:

Methods of delivery:

The two most popular approaches are injection of DNA in saline, using a standard hypodermic needle, and gene gun delivery. … Injection in saline is normally conducted intramuscularly (IM) in skeletal muscle, or intradermally (ID), with DNA being delivered to the extracellular spaces. This can be assisted by electroporation[19]; by temporarily damaging muscle fibres with myotoxins such as bupivacaine; or by using hypertonic solutions of saline or sucrose.[2] Immune responses to this method of delivery can be affected by many factors, including needle type,[8] needle alignment, speed of injection, volume of injection, muscle type, and age, sex and physiological condition of the animal being injected.[2]Gene gun delivery, the other commonly used method of delivery, ballistically accelerates plasmid DNA (pDNA) that has been adsorbed onto gold or tungsten microparticles into the target cells, using compressed helium as an accelerant.[2][12]

Alternative delivery methods have included aerosol instillation of naked DNA on mucosal surfaces, such as the nasal and lung mucosa,[12]and topical administration of pDNA to the eye[20] and vaginal mucosa.[12] Mucosal surface delivery has also been achieved using cationic liposome-DNA preparations,[1] biodegradablemicrospheres,[21][12] attenuated Shigella or Listeria vectors for oral administration to the intestinal mucosa,[22] and recombinant [genetically engineered] adenovirus vectors.[12]

The DNA vaccines depend on DNA uptake. However, “[t]his phenomenon has not been the subject of much research, so the actual mechanism of DNA uptake is not known.”

And what is meant by DNA uptake?  Does it mean as it sounds, that genetically engineered material is taken up by the DNA of those being injected with it?  And if so, does that mean that these vaccines are genetically altering (or “engineering”) those receiving the vaccines?

Is it possible that the mitochondrial dysfunction seen in autistic children is a result of their DNA having been compromised?  The new DNA vaccines derive from failed gene therapy.  Are the new DNA vaccines a continuation of experiments in genetic engineering, being conducted on millions of children?

Cloned animals also suffer from mitochondrial dysfunction.

In the cloned animals, mitochondria are transferred to the eggs along with the nucleus from somatic cells, leading to a mixture of mitochondrial genes from egg and the somatic cell from which the nucleus was obtained. This mixture of mitochondria (called heteroplasmy) introduces incompatibility between mitochondrial and nuclear genetic material that contribute to the high rates of abnormalities and deaths among clones and leads to cell and tissue disruption as the cloned animal develops. The impact of mitochondrial dysfunction is great because the mitochondria provide energy for the cells. http://www.i-sis.org.uk/human_milk_from_cloned_transgenic_cattle.php

And It seems that people have already been genetically engineered.  Dr. Joseph Cummins, professor emeritus of biology at the University of Western Ontario, says “It seems likely that the transplants are going on, but very, very quietly in a regulatory vacuum, perhaps.”

Genetically-Engineered Humans. Barritt, Jason A., et al. “Mitochondria in Human Offspring Derived From Ooplasmic Transplantation.” Human Reproduction, 16.3 (2001), pp 513-6. •

“First Cases of Human Germline Genetic Modification Announced.” British Medical Journal 322 (12 May 2001), p 1144. •

“Genetically Modified Human Babies?” Australian Broadcasting Corporation, 8 May 2001. • Hawes, S.M., C. Sapienza, and K. E. Latham.

“Ooplasmic Donation in Humans: The Potential for Epigenic Modifications.” Human Reproduction 17.4 (2002), 850-2. • Hill, Amelia.

“Horror at ‘Three Parent Foetus’ Gene Disorders.” Observer (London), 20 May 2001.

The 23 new DNA vaccines have been linked to autism.  Are the new DNA vaccines altering and/or damaging children’s DNA, the code of life?

An overview of Murdoch’s connections to the pharmaceutical industry/international bankers cannot answer that question but at a minimum suggest serious problems with vaccines with the greatest wealth power in the world behind promoting them, nonetheless.

Lloyd Blankfein is co-chairman with media mogul Rupert Murdoch in the David Rockefeller-founded Partnership for New York City (PFNYC),15 chartered by the Royal Family of England. This group is currently advancing a world leading biotechnology trust, heavily invested in “genetopharmaceuticals” and flu vaccine genetic engineering. [Emphasis added.]Members of this group, along with George Soros-directed assets, virtually monopolized the genetics industry during the 1990s, culminating in the corporate privatization of the Human Genome Project.19

Involvement of these economic leaders in the vaccine industry is most revealing and even shocking as the following facts evidence:

The Baxter Corporation, indicted for spreading HIV contaminated blood products during the late 1970s through the 1980s; a cheap lethal heparin substitute in 2008;21 and H5N1 contaminated seasonal flu vaccines in early 2009,22 was directed by Mr. Tony White, Soros’s appointee to lead the privately owned Applera Company following their obvious heist of the Human Genome Project during the late 1990s. The sudden privatization of what had previously been public, non-profit, patentable property, also implicated co-sponsors–the U.S. Department of Energy and The Wellcome Trust of London.19,

Today, the American Baxter Company is a major H1N1 vaccine maker for European nations, and at the center of controversy concerning the expanding outbreak of recombinant H1N1-hemorrhagic pneumonia. Many experts conclude the 2009 H1N1 triple reassortant sourced from a lab,25 similar to its 1977 relative.

Rupert Murdoch’s mother, Elizabeth, Dame Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire, and daughter-in-law, Sarah Murdoch, steward the Royal Women’s Hospital and Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, respectively, in Australia. They oversaw their staff conduct H1N1 vaccine trials on infants, children, and pregnant women in 2009, collaborating with Merck’s subsidiary, CSL. Furthermore, Rupert Murdoch’s son James oversees GlaxoSmithKline, another major H1N1 vaccine maker. Regarding efficacy, and more importantly safety, the CSL/Merck H1N1 vaccine tested in Murdoch-family directed facilities was simply assumed to be both safe and effective according to its package insert. The new and old vaccine had “no controlled clinical studies demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination with” the company’s seasonal flu vaccine, “AFLURIA.” Likewise, vaccine safety was speciously assumed following  assessment days comparing those who received AFLURIA (with or without mercury preservative, confounding everyone’s analysis) with those who received some undisclosed “European-licensed trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine as an active control” This “active control” was preserved with mercury.

In plainer language, an unidentified arguably neurotoxic vaccine served as a “placebo control.” Since no inactive placebo control such as saline was used, the study design was obviously flawed, confounding, biased, and arguably fraudulent. It may have precluded observing statistically significant differences between experimental and control groups falsely evidencing safety from lacking adverse event differentials. This intentional obfuscation exclusively benefited those with conflicting interests, and/or those inclined to rely on safety assurances to the detriment of public health and medical science. Yet, Murdoch-directed News Corp. assets heavily promoted these risky H1N1 vaccines as urgently required, safe and effective.

Curiously, in 2008, The Wellcome Trust of London’s Biocentre, the UK’s largest non-governmental source of funds for biomedical research, created a special grant program to heavily fund research into alleged mysterious neurodegenerative diseases linked by censored science to thimerosal mercury.

The Wellcome Trust’s alleged divestment of conflicting pharmaceutical interests following Burroughs Wellcome’s sale of stock to Glaxo PLC, created GlaxoWellcome, currently GlaxoSmithKlein. This allegation of “divestment” is discredited by more than the fund’s involvement in the Human Genome Project’s pirating, implicating George Soros and David Rockefeller-linked investors. Again, GlaxoSmithKlein makes the H1N1 vaccine, and Rupert Murdoch’s heir apparent, James Murdoch, oversees their Board of Directors.

And that’s not all. . . Rupert Murdoch’s Co-Chairman of the PFNYC, Lloyd Blankfein is a major shareholder in the Goldman-Sachs/AstraZeneca partnership. He directed AstraZeneca’s $15 billion acquisition of MedImmune, the H1N1 FLUMIST maker.

Besides James and Rupert’s News Corp directing film makers Twentieth Century Fox and Warner Brothers, the Western World’s  mass-mediated mind-set is reinforced by PFNYC “partner” and Reuters News Service CEO, Thomas H. Glocer. Glocer sits on the Board of Directors of Merck & Company, whose (CSL) H1N1 vaccine, and (Merck’s) Pneumovax vaccine, is broadening markets as the main ingredient–laboratory engineered H1N1 virus–mutates, as in the Ukraine, becoming more deadly.

Additionally, those poorly-paid inadequately-trained pharmacists administering vaccines in supermarkets, draining doctors’ revenue streams, reflect the “hostile takeover” of clinical medicine by Goldman-Sachs’s limited partner, PFNYC “Corporate Partner,” and world-leading “buyout firm,” Kolberg, Kravitz, Roberts & Company (KKR) This “immunization” industry-altering practice is promoted as a “cost-saving” invention according to KKR’s director of Safeway supermarkets, Steven Burd, founder of the Coalition to Advance Healthcare Reform (CAHR),45 popularly called “Obamacare.”

Whatever the answer to questions about the new DNA vaccines, it is obvious that Rupert Murdoch’s connections to the pharmaceutical industry and vaccines are very deep.  No investigation of Murdoch’s crimes should omit his efforts to use his media empire to prevent exposure of potential dangers from the MMR vaccines and possibly all the new DNA vaccines.

The following is taken from Natural news. Thanks Mike

Mike’s synopsis keeps coming back to my mind as I travel around the country and see these obnoxious street signs, especially in Southern Florida with its aged population, and trying to convince that public to go to their local drug store chain to get a flu shot. We are in that season again, and the evils and deceptions of their approach to our health are no less visible now than when Mike Adams first wrote this article a year ago.

We still have to be on guard that such vaccination are not politically made mandatory and forced upon us to feed the hungry pockets of big Pharma corporations. They are used to make profits at the expense. I have done some condensing of this information to make the essence of it come out still more potently – so that our readers get the message. STAY AWAY FROM VACCINES LIKE THE PLAGUE!

She was deathly afraid of the flu.
So she asked her doc what she should do.
He jabbed her unseen
With a swine flu vaccine
Blurting, “Darling, I haven’t a clue.”
- by the Health Ranger

Let’s not beat around the bush on this issue: The swine flu vaccines now being prepared for mass injection into infants, children, teens and adults have never been tested and won’t be tested before the injections begin. In Europe, where flu vaccines are typically tested on hundreds (or thousands) of people before being unleashed on the masses, the European Medicines Agency is allowing companies to skip the testing process entirely.

And yet, amazingly, people are lining up to take the vaccine, absent any safety testing whatsoever. When the National Institutes of Health in the U.S. announced a swine flu vaccine trial beginning in early August, it was inundated with phone calls and emails from people desperate to play the role of human guinea pigs. The power of fear to herd sheep into vaccine injections is simply amazing…

Back in Europe, of course, everybody gets to be a guinea pig since no testing will be done on the vaccine at all. Even worse, the European vaccines will be using adjuvants — chemicals used to multiply the potency of the active ingredients in vaccines.

Notably, there is absolutely no safety data on the use of adjuvants in infants and expectant mothers — the two groups being most aggressively targeted by the swine flu vaccine pushers. The leads us to the disturbing conclusion that the swine flu vaccine could be a modern medical disaster. It’s untested and un-tried. Its ingredients are potentially quite dangerous, and the adjuvants being used in the European vaccines are suspected of causing neurological disorders.

Paralyzed by vaccines

I probably don’t need to remind you that in 1976, a failed swine flu vaccine caused irreparable damage to the nervous systems of hundreds of people, paralyzing many. Medical doctors gave the problem a name, of course, to make it sound like they knew what they were talking about: Guillain-Barre syndrome. (Notably, they never called it “Toxic Vaccine Syndrome” because that would be too informative.)

But the fact remains that doctors never knew how the vaccines caused these severe problems, and if the same event played out today, all the doctors and vaccine pushers would undoubtedly deny any link between the vaccines and paralysis altogether. (That’s what’s happening today with the debate over vaccines and autism: Complete denial.)

In fact, there are a whole lot of things you’ll never be told by health authorities about the upcoming swine flu vaccine. For your amusement, I’ve written down the ten most obvious ones and published them below.

Ten things you’re not supposed to know about the swine flu vaccine

#1 - NEVER TESTED – The vaccine production was “rushed” and the vaccine has never been tested on humans. Do you like to play guinea pig for Big Pharma? If so, line up.

#2 – DANGEROUS ADJUVANTS – Swine flu vaccines contain dangerous adjuvants that cause an inflammatory response. This is why they are suspected of causing autism and other neurological disorders.

#3 – INCREASING THE RISK OF DEATH! – The swine flu vaccine could actually increase your risk of death from swine flu by altering (or suppressing) your immune system response. There is zero evidence that even seasonal flu shots offer protection. Vaccines are the snake oil of modern medicine.

#4 -  NO CLUE ABOUT HARMS – Doctors still don’t know why the 1976 swine flu vaccines paralyzed so many people. And that means they really have no clue whether the upcoming vaccine might cause the same devastating side effects. (And they’re not testing it, either…)

#5 – NOT RESPONSIBLE – Even if the swine flu vaccine kills you, the drug companies aren’t responsible. The U.S. government has granted drug companies complete immunity against vaccine product liability. Thanks to that blanket immunity, drug companies have no incentive to make safe vaccines, because they only get paid based on quantity, not safety (zero liability).

#6 – CAN’T COMPARE TO VITAMIN D’S EFFECT – No swine flu vaccine works as well as vitamin D to protect you from influenza. That’s an inconvenient scientific fact that the U.S. government, the FDA and Big Pharma hope the people never realize.

#7 - THE ODDS – Even if the swine flu vaccine actually works, mathematically speaking if everyone else around you gets the vaccine, you don’t need one! (Because it can’t spread through the population you hang with.) So even if you believe in the vaccine, all you need to do is encourage your friends to go get vaccinated…

#8 - THE BOTTOM LINE $s- Drug companies are making billions of dollars from the production and sale of swine flu vaccines. That money comes out of your pocket — even if you don’t get the jab — because it’s all paid by the taxpayers.

#9 - DECEPTIONS - When people start dying in larger numbers from the swine flu, rest assured that many of them will be the very people who got the swine flu vaccine. Doctors will explain this away with their typical Big Pharma logic: “The number saved is far greater than the number lost.” Of course, the number “saved” is entirely fictional… imaginary… and exists only in their own warped heads.

#10 – ONLY USEFULNESS OF THE VACCINE – The swine flu vaccine centers that will crop up all over the world in the coming months aren’t completely useless: They will provide an easy way to identify large groups of really stupid people. (Too bad there isn’t some sort of blue dye that we could tag ‘em with for future reference…)

The lottery, they say, is a tax on people who can’t do math. Similarly, flu vaccines are a tax on people who don’t understand health.

Australia bans flu vaccines in children after vomiting, fevers, and seizures

The repeated claims by the World Health Organization and Center for Disease Control have been that the flu vaccines are safe and necessary preventatives against dangerous bugs that are really what we should fear. But the facts belie this claim. The epidemic they scared people into believing would happen never did. Their costly remedy, untested, turn out to be highly dangerous, being filled with toxic ingredients like mercury. They have also engaged in a brutally callous campaign to distribute  these lethal and debilitating shots to millions – especially the most vulnerable – children, pregnant women and the aged -  in the process  of seeking to cash machines out of us while walk over mass coffin victims.

There have  been a few countries that have started to wake up and stand up to the vaccine chicanery and fraud by supposed health professionals – and one of them is Australia.

Originally published August 27 2010 by Mike Adams, The Health Ranger in Natural News

Australia bans flu vaccines in children after vomiting, fevers, seizure

Although it’s still summer in North America, it is of course winter in Australia, and the flu season is well under way there. As usual, Australian health authorities have been urging parents there to vaccinate their children against the flu, propagating the mythology that flu vaccines are both safe and effective. But this time around, many Australian parents found out the hard way that they were being lied to.

It didn’t take long to realize the truth after their children start going into convulsions following the flu vaccine injections. Other children began vomiting or exhibiting dangerously high levels of fever. One child has gone into a coma and may never recover.

As reported in WA Today (http://www.watoday.com.au/wa-news/f…)

“Perth mother of two Bea Flint said her 11-month-old boy Avery had a seizure after receiving the first dose of the two-dose flu vaccination on Saturday. Mrs Flint said that after the 9am vaccination she noticed Avery had a minor temperature about 2pm. At 7.45pm, Avery started whimpering and moaning. When Mrs Flint got to his cot the baby had vomited and was lying on his side having a seizure. ‘He couldn’t cry – his head was hanging down in the car seat and he couldn’t move. I was petrified – it was one of the worst experiences of my life.”

The story goes on to say, “The doctor who treated Avery told Mrs Flint her baby was the fifth child with similar symptoms admitted to the hospital that day.”

In other words, this was no rare event. Vaccinated children suffering severe convulsions were piling up in hospital emergency rooms across the country.

The real kicker, though, is that children started having convulsions two weeks ago but Australian health authorities ignored them, insisting that the vaccine was safe and causing it to be injected in yet more babies. Two weeks later, with dozens more children experiencing convulsions (and who knows how many thousands actually being harmed in less obvious ways), Commonwealth chief health officer Professor Jim Bishop finally announced the vaccination ban.

Remember: Health authorities in Australia, UK, the United States and everywhere else have relentlessly insisted that flu vaccines are perfectly safe and can’t possibly harm anyone. In the U.S., the FDA has given its approval to the very same flu vaccine that’s harming children in Australia, and the CDC has insisted that all children in the USA — regardless of age — should now be injected with this very same flu vaccine.

So now we’ve got a vaccine that Australia has banned but the USA somehow says is safe enough to inject into a six-month-old infant. How many convulsing babies will it take in the U.S. before American parents realize the truth about flu vaccines?

Chemically-induced convulsions

As you’re reading this, you may find yourself wonder, “Well, what could cause such convulsions in children?”

The answer is more terrifying than you might think, because it’s not “weakened flu viruses” that vaccine manufacturer claim they put into the vaccines. A weakened flu virus doesn’t send children into convulsions. Only a chemical can do that.

The chemical in question is one that’s routinely added to most vaccines as a way to aggravate the immune system to respond to the presence of the weakened virus. It’s called an “adjuvant” and consists of a highly inflammatory chemical that we now know may damage brain tissues and the nervous system. It is this adjuvant that most likely caused the convulsions in children.

Even in children who don’t experience convulsions, there is speculation that this adjuvant may lead to future Alzheimer’s disease or other neurological disorders. Vaccine manufacturers always attempt to downplay their use of adjuvant chemicals, and few media outlets focus on this important point, but it is the adjuvant that is most likely responsible for sending these Australian children into hospitals with convulsions.

Health authorities defend dangerous vaccine

One thing I’ve noticed about vaccine pushers is that they behave like irrational zealots. No matter how much evidence surfaces about the dangers of vaccines, they continue to mindlessly push them while ignoring the evidence.

A pediatric professor in Australia, Dr Peter Richmond, admitted that researchers were trying to figure out if the entire vaccine was dangerous, or if there was just a bad batch. But even before getting the answer to this question, he goes on to say that everybody over the age of five should go ahead and get injected with this same vaccine! (http://www.watoday.com.au/wa-news/f…)

In other words, he’s so convinced the vaccine is safe — even after dozens of children were obviously harmed by it — that he’s still pushing the same dangerous vaccine onto everybody else!

This is precisely the kind of attitude reflected across the vaccine industry. Reports of children being harmed, or paralyzed, or hospitalized by vaccines are always written off as “coincidence.” The mounting evidence is simply thrown out the window because it conflicts with the pro-vaccine agenda.

Can you imagine the outrage if an herbal product sent fifty kids to the hospital suffering from convulsions? Health authorities across the world would be quick to condemn the product, and they’d confiscate it right off the shelves while shutting down the operations of its manufacturer. But somehow when a vaccine does the same thing, these same health authorities urge people to keep on injecting their children with it!

It makes no sense. But then again, the vaccine industry was never based on rational thinking in the first place. If health authorities were truly rational, they’d be handing out vitamin D supplements to children instead of injecting them with vaccines, because vitamin D has been scientifically proven to provide better protection against the flu than vaccines. (http://www.naturalnews.com/029333_v…)

Of course, to ask health authorities to make rational decisions is sort of like asking politicians to start telling the truth. In the complicated world of profits and politics, rational, honest thinking just doesn’t get any traction. It’s far more profitable to keep lying to the world and raking in billions of dollars each year off dangerous vaccines, even as they continue to harm innocent children.

I often wonder… How many dead children will it take before parents wake up and realize that flu vaccines are dangerous? The answer may surprise you: Even a million dead children won’t change the minds of most parents because they just do whatever they’re told by health authorities, even if it makes no rational sense.

Most parents are so brainwashed by the medical system that they would gladly line up to have their babies injected with chemotherapy if they were told it was somehow necessary.

At some point, the parents whose babies are being harmed or potentially even killed by these vaccines can only blame themselves. They were the ones who brought their babies to be injected with a chemical adjuvant and viral fragments, and they should know better than to trust the government when it comes to health advice. The government, after all, still says that pharmaceutical chemicals are good for you while vitamins, herbs and natural remedies are dangerous. And it’s the government that approved the very vaccines that are right now sending these children to the hospital.

Any parent that trusts the government with the health of their child is setting themselves up for catastrophe. And that catastrophe could very well cost them the life of their child.

Additional sources for this story include:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/h…

FLU VACCINE BANNED IN AUSTRALIA

This letter delivers urgent notice that dozens of health experts, religious leaders, and world leading scientists are condemning governments worldwide for going along with pharmaceutical industry-influenced plans to inject people with poorly-tested toxic vaccines this flu season based on fears of pandemic swine flu.

1. The flu vaccines are questionably effective, dangerous, insufficiently tested, and potentially lethal.

• Substantive research shows all flu vaccinations have little to no effect on preventing or minimizing the flu.

• Side effects from vaccine fillers and adjuvants—especially squalene— include a variety of debilitating auto-immune diseases and a significant percentage of deaths. Squalene, condemned congressional investigators in 2004, is indicated as the primary cause of tens of thousands of deaths, and hundreds of thousands of chronic cases of Gulf War-related illnesses.

• Besides squalene, other vaccine ingredients include: animal tissues, viral proteins, foreign DNA and RNA, formaldehyde, live genetically-engineered viruses, and mercury that has been scientifically linked to skyrocketing rates of autism in children.

• Significant evidence, including genetic sequencing analysis, proves the circulating “swine flu” sourced from man-made outbreaks, is from collaborating government and vaccine-industry laboratories.

2. Mandatory vaccinations and quarantines violate human rights and US Constitutional mandates including religious freedoms and compensation required when anyone’s property, including natural body immunity, is taken.

• Those who refuse the live virus swine flu vaccination may be jailed or held indefinitely in private-industry administered internment camps directed by FEMA.

• Government officials have increased demand for flu vaccines, and public compliance with vaccination policies using fear and propaganda consistent with military psychological operations.

• The U.S. Government classifies the avian flu as a biological weapon, and administers “biodefense” as a “national security” operation.

3. Alternative and complementary individual care options, including proven disease prevention strategies, are being grossly neglected by government health officials.

• Through building a healthy immune system using vitamin supplements, herbs, immune-building medicinal mushrooms, nano-silvers, oxygenation therapies, a healthy diet, proper hydration, and adequate rest, people do not result to toxic vaccinations for any type of flu prevention.
• Scientific evidence has shown one to three Vitamin C IV’s of 50,000 gm gives 100% relief from this or any flu.

GOOD NEWS: According to several constitutional legal authorities, the Federal Government and WHO cannot legally mandate vaccines for small town America at the state level, they can only recommend it. The US Constitution provides for each state to decide whether or not to allow religious, philosophical, and medical exemptions, or to allow self-quarantine at a location of personal choice. It is your responsibility to tell local county, township, and state officials what you choose.

ACT NOW: Use a template letter to write your local and state representatives, urging them to support your right to religious, philosophical, and medical exemptions as well as your right to self-quarantine in a location of your choice.

READ MORE: The following letter is a full scientifically documented article, which explains all of these points in detail and is available for you to share through the links below. This letter will empower you to speak at town meetings, county councils, and to local state representatives to protect your rights, your children, and your grandchildren by creating laws that will protect against what some people feel is genocidal abuse by agencies whom some believe are aligned with the attempt to create a One World Government, such as WHO, U.N., and the Federal Governors who are overstepping their powers.

Particular sections in the following letter we recommend reading are: the Eleven Point Summary, Brief Summary, One Sentence Summary, and all of Point Eleven (which outlines the next steps to take, as this is an action letter that requests your thoughtful participation).

SHARE THIS INFORMATION: Please share this information with everyone you know, as we have the power to win this battle.

CLICK HERE to view the full article online and for the website address you may use to email your mailing lists, friends, and family.

CLICK HERE for a PDF version you may print out, and can also share this information with your contacts. A PDF form it is not editable, so you may send this letter out to your e-mail list with the confidence of knowing the information presented here will not be changed.

CLICK HERE to print out a template letter to send to your local and state representatives.

Posted by Vaccine Action at 1:05 PM 4 comments

Vaccine Action Letter: Summary

A HARD LOOK AT MANDATORY LIVE VIRUS VACCINATIONS

WHAT’S REALITY AND WHAT TO DO

11 POINT SUMMARY:

1. The proposed swine flu squalene adjuvant live virus vaccination is neither adequately or sufficiently tested, nor proven effective or safe; it is uninsurable, can stimulate the onset of a variety of debilitating auto-immune diseases, and is a serious assault on the immune system.

2. The swine flu vaccine contains dangerous & life-threatening fillers, including adjuvants such as squalene, animal tissues, which may include pig tissue, viral and bacterial proteins, and live viruses—all of which contain pig DNA.

3. Live viruses have a history of lethal danger, disease, and are contagious. Secondary Spread of live viruses from those vaccinated with a live virus lasting up to three weeks is a well-known fact.

4. The swine flu appears to have been laboratory generated and designed to have its dangerous effects amplified by the use of all the available swine flu vaccines.

5. The United States government classifies the bird flu virus as a biological weapon.

6. If the government intent is to make the live virus squalene adjuvant swine flu vaccination mandatory for all Americans, it is a violation of the Bill of Rights of the Constitution of the United States.

7. Analysis from the British Medical Journal article titled, Influenza Vaccination: Policy Versus Evidence, presents evidence from a systematic review based on a meta-analysis of all the research that shows inactivated vaccines have little or no effect on preventing or minimizing the flu.

8. Those who refuse the live virus squalene adjuvant swine flu and regular flu vaccinations may be jailed or held indefinitely in internment camps established by states or FEMA because the so called swine flu pandemic has been, as far as we are concerned, unnecessarily classified as a Level 6 Pandemic, potentially allowing international law to override the United States
Constitution to justify American martial law and detention for vaccine refusers.

9. Attempts by the United States government to increase the demand for flu vaccinations through fear are explicitly revealed in a classified, private CDC (Center for Disease Control) sponsor conference for vaccine manufacturer executives entitled “7-step Recipes to Increase Demand for Flu Vaccination”.

10. The best way to be protected from any flu including the H1N1 live virus swine flu is to have a healthy immune system by living a natural, earth-connected way of being, which includes: organic, plant-source-only foods, supplements including nano-silver, vitamin C, A, and D, medicinal immune-building mushrooms and herbs, and specific aromatherapy oils. Physicians of the State of Arizona Board of Homeopathic and Integrated Medicine Society have found that usually one to three Vitamin C IV’s of 50,000 milligrams will give 100% relief from this or any flu in the instance one actually gets the flu. Other effective treatments include nano-silvers and Oxygen Treatment Therapy (OTT). This is a safe, less expensive, simple, and more effective treatment as compared to Tamiflu (Tamiflu, although supposedly designed for the antiviral effect, is a psychotropic drug that has significant brain and nervous system side effects, which are toxic and debilitating). These healthy approaches have been historically proven to be far more safe and effective than generated vaccines, which have truly never been scientifically proven to be either safe or effective except for building the economic pockets of the vaccine companies. In other words, there are strong international and national vested interests on many levels backing these inadequately tested, dangerous, and ineffective vaccines. These vested interest groups are not exactly concerned about your health.

11. We have options and we can create more. It is important that we all take a stand while we are still healthy enough to be standing.

BRIEF SUMMARY:

There are two reasonable questions that must be asked: (1) Is the swine flu live virus squalene adjuvant vaccine safe and effective, and if so, (2) will vaccinating 95% or more of the general population provide any more protection for the whole population? If both of these questions were answered in the affirmative, then we would have a reasonable justification for mandatory vaccinations. However, the overwhelming scientific data suggests just the opposite. The live virus swine flu has not been adequately tested, proven safe or effective, is non-insurable, and because of the well-known phenomena of Secondary Transmission of live virus vaccines (meaning it can be contagious), it may actually increase the transmission of the virus.

This live virus vaccine has 2.3 times more genetic mutability, and added adjuvant toxicity than a natural virus because it includes squalene. Squalene has significant autoimmune inflammatory effects, and general severe autoimmune effects, which are a significant potential threat to the health of the individual. According to congressional hearings in 2004, squalene was considered the main cause of 300,000 GIs with Gulf War Syndrome who are now applying for complete disability. Aside from the horrendous, misery and ill health created by the Gulf War Syndrome, based on our understanding of the 1918 flu pandemic (which some significant scientific work has suggested was precipitated by the water-oil adjuvant that was part of the typhus vaccine and unknowingly given to the soldiers to protect against typhus), it appears that the water-oil adjuvant in combination with the Spanish Flu was the main precipitator of the millions of deaths that occurred. Research at that time, which was limited because they didn’t even know about viruses, suggests that the high percentage of deaths in soldiers (healthy young men) was connected to the adjuvant, which gave them a hyper-immune, auto-immune response and cytokine storm (strong inflammatory reaction) 3 to 6 months after receiving the vaccine. This explains why so many of them died from hemoragenic pneumonia, activated by the viral flu. The use of squalene as an adjuvant in the vaccine, which causes severe health symptoms on its own, could actually mirror the whole 1918 scenario. The interaction of the flu and the hyperimmune auto-immune imbalance response to the squalene (a water-oil adjuvant) could theoretically pre-dispose people who receive the vaccine with this live virus in it to mimic the actual pandemic called the Spanish Flu of 1918. Please understand that this deadly synergy of squalene and the live virus in a vaccine is theoretical and there is no proof that this is the potential case, except the research on the actual cause of the 1918 Spanish Flu. However, this just adds to the potential risk of a squalene-based live virus swine flu vaccination.

According to the British Medical Journal article titled, Influenza Vaccination: Policy Versus Evidence, evidence from a systematic review based on a meta-analysis of all the research shows vaccines have little or no effect on preventing or minimizing the flu.

In other words, the benefit to risk ratio is extremely poor from a scientific point of view. In answering the second part of the question, all the vaccine studies to date show that vaccinating 95% or more of a population does not make a difference in stopping outbreaks of the particular disease people were vaccinated for. In fact, based on the scientific evidence, mass mandatory vaccinations with a highly mutable live virus could actually activate a real and lethal pandemic rather than prevent it. Therefore, from a purely scientific perspective, there is no valid reason for mandatory vaccinations. For this reason we believe that all people have a constitutional, religious, philosophical, and medical right to the freedom of choice of whether or not to be vaccinated.

In essence, as confirmed by veteran US Constitutional attorney Larry Becraft, there is no basis in statutory law for state official mandates, county cooperation, or public compliance, in-so-far-as forced vaccinations and/or quarantines, even during officially declared epidemics or pandemics. Presidential executive orders lack the legal power to force or enforce vaccination and/or quarantine mandates on the American people. Likewise, state statutes and administrative rules and regulations pertaining to compulsory vaccinations and quarantines advanced by health departments shall be prohibited as violations of fundamental human rights, religious freedoms, and just compensation for personal property secured by the US Constitution. Given these conclusions, it is official malfeasance for state and federal health officials to advance such unconstitutional policies and engage such procedures. Furthermore, health officials may be held accountable for gross criminal negligence: engaging in broadcasting flu warnings, using the news media to relay deadly predictions of pandemic morbidity and mortality, or otherwise sensitizing people to promote compliance with vaccination or forced quarantines while grossly neglecting their mental health and quality of life; increasing anxiety, phobia, and depression, and causing severe economic damages from the medical, psychosocial, and behavioral impacts of these public health malpractices. In other words no one has any constitutional authority at the Federal or State level to enforce mandatory vaccinations. However, waiting until legal suits are filed afterwards is not an option because irreversible damage may be done by then to our global family. The State officials are more vulnerable to official malfeasance. In other words, lawsuits on one level also have the immediate power to veto Federal mandates of forced vaccinations. At the state level we have protection from Federal mandates…and in practical reality we have more personal access to state politicians to get them to vote against any Federal mandates, as they are more directly accountable to the public. For further information, please see: http://www.PandemicFluOnline.com.

ONE SENTENCE SUMMARY:

The overwhelming scientific studies and research do not in any way support the action of mandatory flu, squalene adjuvant, live virus vaccination; to do so might result in the desecration of a significant amount of God’s creation of humanity on planet earth; the science strongly suggests that mandatory vaccinations are both immoral and ethically illegal (ethics that are core in the Judaic-Christian system) and this mandatory vaccination violates the basic Ten Commandments in at least 6 ways: Thou shall not murder, steal, lie, bear false witness, engage in idol worship (money and power), envy or covet.

We also recommend reading Vaccine Safety Manual by Neil Miller for additional scientific information on the subject as well as Cochrane collaboration/influenza studies, which show virtually no benefit to the flu vaccines. Also check Oct. 6 BMJ, Dec 2006 New England Journal of Medicine, and Feb. 2005 Archives of Internal Medicine. http://thinktwice.com/

FOR A MORE DETAILED SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION AND EXPLANATION ON EACH POINT, PLEASE READ FURTHER. FOR A CLEAR SET OF ACTION PLAN OPTIONS, GO TO POINT 11

Posted by Vaccine Action at 1:04 PM 2 comments

Vaccine Action Letter: Expanded Research

Potential Vaccination Risks

Dear Parents and Grandparents, We are writing this letter as concerned parents, grandparents, physicians, health professionals, and clergy for the health and well-being of our children, grandchildren, and also ourselves. Everything reported here, either from direct scientific papers or explicit written reports by reputable leaders, is based on fact—not rumor or myth. The scientific research below, which suggests the upcoming live virus squalene adjuvant swine flu vaccination may be compromising to the health and well-being of you and your loved ones, is overwhelming. The costs—including life-threatening, life-crippling side effects and death—are high; the theoretical benefits are questionable—at best. Our interest is that you have enough valid scientific data to make an informed choice in the best interest of the health of yourself and your children. The decision of whether or not to vaccinate is a personal one. Every parent should be allowed full freedom to accept or reject vaccines for their children and themselves. We should be allowed the privilege of “informed consent,” the same as with any medical procedure that includes the possibility of adverse reactions. Parents are ultimately responsible for their own health and the health of their children.

1. The proposed swine flu squalene adjuvant live virus vaccination is neither adequately or sufficiently tested, nor proven effective or safe; is uninsurable, can stimulate the onset of a variety of debilitating auto-immune diseases, and is a serious assault on the immune system.

At issue is what we consider to be the serious deception and general misinformation about the safety of the impending live virus swine flu vaccine, which is neither adequately tested nor safe, although the so-called “researchers” have publicly declared it safer than the regular flu vaccine before even beginning the testing process. They may be right in that the regular flu vaccine was anything but safe. There were an average of 8,364 adverse reactions to the flu vaccine reported to the federal government in 2007 and 2008. The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a passive reporting system, notorious for under-representing true reaction rates. Passive reporting systems may capture just 1 percent or less of true damage to recipients of pharmaceutical drugs (as noted by David Kessler, former head of the FDA). Based on the VAERS data, calculations suggest an average of 850,000 life threatening, life crippling side effects, or deaths associated with all vaccinations given per year based on an extrapolation of the CDC data. Dr. Marie-Paule Kieny, Director of the Initiative for Vaccine Research at the World Health Organization (WHO) Headquarters, even stated herself that vaccines “do induce adverse reactions and this can be the case as well for adjuvanted vaccines and non-adjuvanted vaccines.” She also said the vaccine safety data is, for certain populations, significantly lacking; and for quite a few populations, there is no data at all to verify the safety of vaccines—including children, those over 65, pregnant mothers, and asthmatics.

Dr. Kieny actually says that she doesn’t even know what the proportions of the ingredients are in the 4.9 billion vaccines they are about to inject into people. There have been no complete clinical trials for a medical product that is about to be administered on mass to pregnant women and children. There literally is no data for this vaccine as per its use in children, pregnant women, and asthmatics. There is a considerable amount of data with squalene in Gulf War vets receiving both an experimental anthrax vaccine and experimental HIV vaccine. It is highly associated with at least 300,000 vets who have made permanent claims for total disability. Animal research also supports these findings.

As reported in the Irish Times, the Lancet recently stated: “Countries need to assess carefully the risks and benefits of the rapid approval of a human swine flu vaccine to avoid repeat of past problems with mass-vaccination.” According to the London Evening Standard, WHO officials have warned that H1N1 vaccines may be unsafe. The Institute of Science and Society has said that the vaccines will be far more deadly than the swine flu, and that mass vaccinations are a recipe for disaster.

The new swine flu live virus vaccine could be more dangerous than “seasonal” flu vaccines because some of them are using new technologies, and all of them are being fast-tracked, reducing testing periods and safety requirements before licensing occurs. As mentioned earlier, the doctor responsible for overseeing the trials has already claimed the shot is “really as safe, actually if not safer,” than previous flu vaccines. That’s a curious statement considering he is still recruiting test subjects and the trials have not yet begun. This is anything but a scientific attitude and certainly does not inspire confidence in the found results—especially if they are already predetermined.

2. The swine flu vaccine contains dangerous & life-threatening fillers, including adjuvants such as squalene, animal tissues, which may include pig tissue, viral and bacterial proteins, and live viruses—all of which contain pig DNA.

The contents of this live swine flu virus vaccine injection are cause for concern. One of the most dangerous substances contained in this injection is squalene. There are over two-dozen animal studies that show squalene’s ability to induce severe autoimmunity. Research at this point suggests squalene is heavily associated with the debilitating and life-destroying Gulf War Syndrome. Because of this, there is a serious risk of a Gulf War Syndrome outbreak amongst the vaccinated general public. Of course, this autoimmune syndrome will not show up after one week of human vaccine trials, nor will autism, Guillain–Barre syndrome (a demyelization of the nervous system that can paralyze a person from the neck down), or an assortment of autoimmune disorders including type 1 diabetes. In one study of over 100,000 vaccinated children in Finland, there was a 147% increase in the rate of type 1 diabetes in those vaccinated. The lack of sufficient testing on this experimental live virus vaccine raises many concerns. There are no criteria on its efficacy or valid statistics to speak of. During the 1976 swine flu scare, the swine flu vaccine itself killed hundreds & sickened countless others, and had an unusually high rate of Guillain-Barre Syndrome associated with it.

Dr. Leonard Horowitz, author of Emerging Viruses: AIDS And Ebola: Nature, Accident or Intentional? says the swine-bird-human flu strain, reported to be found first in Mexico in late-March 2009, most likely came from Dr. James S. Robertson and his colleagues in association with the US Center for Disease Control (CDC) and vaccine manufacturer Novavax, Inc., which was ready to profit from the release. Nobody else takes H5N1 Asian-flu infected chickens, takes them to Europe, extracts their DNA, combines their proteins with H1N1 viruses from the 1918 Spanish flu isolate, additionally mixes in some swine-flu genes from pigs, then reverse engineers them to infect humans, he said. True Ott, PhD., N.D. also gives evidence of this being a laboratory generated virus, and associates the origin of this lab-generated flu with Novartis International AG, which happens to be the world’s largest multinational pharmaceutical company. He feels the key figure in making this lab-generated virus is Dr. Jeffrey Taubenberger. What is key to this understanding is that two researchers have made a very strong case for this being a laboratory-created virus. http://uncensored.co.nz/2009/04/30/dr-horowitz-mexicanswine-flu-made-in-lab/

Some of the new H1N1 (swine flu) vaccines are going to be made by Novartis. These shots will probably be made in PER.C6 cells (human retina cells) and contain MF59, a potentially debilitating adjuvant. MF-59 is an oil-based adjuvant primarily composed of squalene. All rats injected with squalene (oil) adjuvants developed a disease that left them crippled, dragging their paralyzed hindquarters across their cages. Injected squalene can cause severe arthritis and severe immune responses, such as autoimmune arthritis and lupus.

Reference (1): Kenney, RT. Edleman, R. “Survey of human-use adjuvants.” Expert Review of Vaccines. 2 (2003) p171.
Reference (2): Matsumoto, Gary. Vaccine A: The Covert Government Experiment That’s Killing Our Soldiers and Why GI’s Are Only the First Victims of this Vaccine. New York: Basic Books. P54.

LIST OF VACCINE FILLERS & ADJUVANTS: This list, officially administered by design with every vaccine provided to the public, in addition to the squalene that appears to be in this upcoming swine flu vaccine, is of great concern to many parents and grandparents, with the announcement that they will start vaccinating children and pregnant women first and then “wait to see if there are too many adverse events” (including seizures, neurological problems, and death).

In addition to the viral and bacterial RNA or DNA that is part of the vaccines, here are the fillers:

• Aluminum hydroxide – directly linked to causing Alzheimer’s disease
• Aluminum phosphate – directly linked to causing Alzheimer’s disease
• Ammonium sulfate – an inorganic chemical compound used as fertilizer and “protein purifier”; known to cause kidney & liver damage, gastrointestinal dysfunctions
• Amphotericin B – an “antifungal disinfectant” and anti-biotic, which damages the urinary tract, bowels, and heart functions
• Animal tissues (a causal element for all the various auto-immune diseases associated with vaccination): horse blood, rabbit brain, dog kidney, monkey kidney, chick embryo, chicken egg, duck egg, pig blood, Porcine (pig) pancreatic hydrolysate of casein (the pig protein/tissue is an additional objectionable issue for Jewish and Muslim people)
• Calf (bovine) serum & fetal bovine serum (cow blood is recognized as a significant transmitter of Mad Cow Disease)
• Betapropiolactone
• Formaldehyde - used as “a preservative & disinfectant”, known to cause cancer, chronic bronchitis, eye irritation when exposed to the body’s immune system
• Formalin
• Gelatin
• Glycerol
• Human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)
• Hydrolyzed gelatin
• Monosodium glutamate (MSG) - now known to cause cancer in humans, also linked to obesity
• Neomycin (anti-biotic)
• Neomycin sulfate (anti-biotic)
• Phenol red indicator – a highly toxic disinfectant dye, attributed to liver, kidney, heart & respiratory damage
• Phenoxyethanol (antifreeze) - proven to have extreme neurotoxic side effects
• Potassium diphosphate
• Potassium monophosphate
• Polymyxin B
• Polysorbate 20
• Polysorbate 80 – associated with infertility when injected
• Residual MRC5 proteins
• Sorbitol
• Sucrose
• Thimerosal (mercury) – a neurotoxin linked to psychological, neurological, & immunological problems—especially autism. Nervous system damage (such as sub-acute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE), brachial plexitis, post-vaccinal encephalitis, transverse myelitis and peripheral neuropathies), kidney disease, birth defects, dental problems, mood swings, mental changes, hallucinations, memory loss, and inability to concentrate can occur. Symptoms also include tremors, loss of dermal sensitivity, slurred speech, and—in rare cases—even death and paralysis. This additive alone was the catalyst for another recent Class Action Lawsuit organized by mothers of children born with autism & the many related behavioral disorders associated with it. Autism is now occurring at levels never seen before in history; depending on the state, its rate is now 1 in 67 to 1 in 150. The autism rates used to be 1 in 20,000. Mercury may also be associated with the significantly increased rates of senility and Alzheimer’s, which is associated with five or more successive flu vaccinations. Although most mercury (thimerosal) has been removed from children’s vaccines, it is still in all flu vaccines at toxic doses.
• Tri(n)butylphosphate,
• VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells – linked to the SV-40 virus known to cause leukemia
• Washed sheep red blood cells

*This data is available via: www.mercola.com
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2001/03/07/vaccine-ingredients.aspx

THESE ADDITIVES ARE GIVEN TO OUR CHILDREN WITHOUT PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE OR CONSENT.

What’s the problem with this horrendous looking list? The problem is two-fold: (1) the adjuvants are added to increase inflammation and immune response in the system, and (2) the adjuvants are significantly detrimental to the overall welfare of the organisms, according to the neurosurgeon Russell Blaylock, M.D., an expert in this field. His research suggests the vaccinations may cause brain swelling and inflammation for up to two years. This alone would be enough to significantly disrupt the immune and endocrine systems, as well as increase senility, activate Alzheimer’s, and other brain dysfunctions. For example, Hugh Fudenberg, MD, Founder and Director of the Neuro lmmuno Therapeutic Research Foundation, reported at the NVIC International Vaccine Conference in Arlington, Virginia in September 1997, that five consecutive seasonal (yearly) flu shots increases the risk of Alzheimer’s disease ten fold. Other devastating side effects of vaccines involve neurological damage, including encephalitis, transverse myelitis, peripheral nerve damage, autism, seizures, mental retardation, language delays, behavioral problems, multiple sclerosis, and SSPE (sub-acute sclerosing panencephalitis). There is also significant animal research that supports Blaylock’s findings.

The veterinary research has shown that vaccines can cause a wide range of brain and nervous system damage. In the Merck Manual it states, in regard to its own product, that vaccines can cause encephalitis: brain inflammation and damage. Merck states, “Examples are the encephalitis following measles, chicken pox, rubella, small pox, vaccinia, and many other less well-defined viral infections.”

Although dog and cat research doesn’t necessarily mean it will be the same for humans, it is highly probable this animal research is revealing what is really happening with human vaccines. Because of this, there is much to learn by looking at the animal vaccine research. The following is a summary of some of this research.

In the Canine Health Concerns (CHC) study, reports show that 73.1% of the dogs developed short attention spans within three months of being vaccinated. 72% of the dogs were considered to be nervous and worrying within three months post vaccination. It is interesting that dogs can develop paralyzed rear legs and death shortly after a vaccine shot and that paresis is listed as a symptom of encephalitis in the Merck Manual. The Science of Vaccine Damage by Catherine O’Driscoll outlines results from several animal studies regarding the effects of vaccinations on dogs and cats as collaborated by a team at Purdue University School of Veterinary Medicine.

Vaccinated dogs in the produced study developed autoantibodies to their own bio-chemical protein structures, which included antibodies against fibronectin, laminin, DNA, albumin, cytochrome C, cardiolipin, and collagen. The fibronectin is involved in tissue repair, cell multiplication and growth, and the differentiation between tissues and organs. The vaccinated dogs also developed autoantibodies to laminin affecting adhesion, differentiation, spreading, and proliferation and moving of cells. What the vaccines are doing is disrupting the natural intelligence of the cells. The vaccinated dogs also developed autoantibodies to their own collagen, which is about one quarter of all the protein in the body and thus, in the CHC 1997 study of 4,000 dogs there was a much higher number of dogs developing mobility problems shortly after they were vaccinated. The dogs also developed autoantibodies to their own DNA.

The AVMA (American Veterinary Medical Association) Vaccine-Associated Feline Sarcoma Task Force conducted several studies to determine why 160,000 cats each year in the USA developed terminal cancer at their injection sites. Veterinarians around the world, as well as the British Government, have acknowledged the fact that cats do get vaccine-induced cancer. In August 2003 the Journal of Veterinary Medicine reported an Italian study that showed dogs also developed vaccine-induced cancer at their injection sites. It is no coincidence that vaccine-site cancer is a possible sequel to human vaccines. For example, Dr. Berniece Eddy, a microbiologist at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), has proven that both dead and live vaccines carry a monkey retrovirus (SV-40) that produces an inheritable cancer in experimental animals. It is unfortunate to note that this monkey retrovirus (SV-40), which is spread from human to human and from mother to child, also appears frequently in human cancer sites. In 1987, Dr. Hilleman, head of all vaccine production of Merck Pharmaceuticals, stunned the world with his public admissions that mass vaccination campaigns of the 1950s and ‘60s likely caused thousands of cancer deaths each year. This was due to the presence of SV-40. Doctors estimate that the virus was injected into tens of millions during the vaccination campaigns, including several million in Canada. It is also widely acknowledged that vaccines can cause a fast acting, usually fatal, disease called autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA). People may die from this in days. In the Merck Manual of Diagnosis and Therapy, even though Merck is a multinational vaccine manufacturer, it states that AIHA may be caused by modified live virus vaccines (MLV). The British Government’s Working Group also acknowledged this.

The veterinary research also showed a connection between vaccine events and arthritis. Again, it is no accident that the New England Journal of Medicine reported it is possible to isolate the rubella virus from affected joints in children vaccinated against rubella. It also reported isolating viruses from the blood of women with prolonged arthritis following vaccination. In 2000, the CHC’s 1997 findings indicated that polyarthritis and other diseases like amyloidosis, which affects organs in dogs, were linked to the combined vaccines given to dogs. The dog research also confirms our explanation of human autoimmune responses to vaccination because they also found that dogs produced antibodies against their own DNA and their own tissues, such as found in heart cells. When we look at this picture from a broader perspective, it is not too hard to show scientifically that vaccines can put people into an allergic state, which may range from mild to anaphylactic shock and death. There are also some individuals who have an inherited faulty B and T cell functioning and therefore are very susceptible to abnormal immune reactions to vaccinations. The Merck Manual warns that patients with or from families with genetically altered B and or T cell immune cell deficiency history should not receive live virus vaccines due to the severe rate and risk of infection. How is this going to work when vaccinations are mandated with no medical or religious exceptions? In other words, some of these B and T cells will manifest as food allergies, neurological deterioration, eczema and heart disease. A deranged immune response may lead to inflammatory conditions such as arthritis, colitis, pancreatitis, and a number of autoimmune diseases as well as cancer and leukemia. The more serious meaning of this is that people with these conditions can die if they receive these live virus vaccinations because their immune systems are not strong enough to handle viral assault from modified live virus vaccinations. Some veterinarians have actually said, “I think that vaccines… are leading
killers of dogs and cats in America today.”

A major mechanism, which is the explanation for these life-threatening autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, such as type 1 diabetes, severe rheumatism, Guillain-Barre, SIDS (sudden infant death syndrome), other autoimmune diseases, and death, is that all the foreign animal tissues in a vaccine can set off an autoimmune response, which is the cause of all of these “diseases”, which attack various organs and tissues according to one’s genetic pre-disposition toward a particular inflammatory disease. What that means is these animal tissues are foreign antigens that the body responds to as antigens in an attempt to eliminate the foreign invaders. In essence, the immune system in essence creates an attack against these unhealthy invaders with its own antibodies. However, in the case of an autoimmune response, these foreign tissues create a cross reaction that ends up attacking our own organ tissues, which are similar to the animal tissues that were injected, such as attacking the beta cells of the pancreas, the brain cells, and the myelin sheaths. These two factors combined with the danger of a live virus create a potentially lethal effect.

SO WHAT IS THE PROBLEM WITH LIVE VIRUSES?

3. Live viruses have a history of lethal danger, disease, and are contagious. Secondary Spread of live viruses from those vaccinated with a live virus lasting up to three weeks is a well-known fact.

We have to understand that live virus vaccines have a history of danger and disease, especially of the disease that is targeted. For example, the live polio flu vaccine virus that was used from 1979 – 2000 was pulled off the market because the vaccine itself was considered to be the major cause of polio and as such, Dr. Salk, the inventor of the vaccine, admitted this to be the case.

The contagious power of a live virus vaccine is no longer new information. It is scientifically recognized that an attenuated live virus vaccine can be contagious. The scientific term for this is called Secondary Transmission. Translated into common language, it means if all the children are vaccinated with a live virus, the adults who haven’t been vaccinated are significantly more likely to pick up the live virus from being in contact with children. The current science has found those who are injected with a live virus vaccine are releasing the live virus from their bodies for up to three weeks, contrary to the inaccurate theory that everyone needs to be vaccinated to stop an epidemic, which is a false and unproven justification. The real danger is the opposite. The live virus vaccinated people can infect everyone else.

There is also significant research to show that in populations that are 95% fully vaccinated, viral infection outbreaks still occur. This is extremely well documented with major communicable diseases such as measles and pertussis. For further information please see:
http://thinktwice.com/7reasons.pdfor http://www.opposingviews.com/questions/should-schoolsrequire-that-children-be-vaccinated.

Another piece of important information regarding the danger of live viruses was an “informal” clinical trial of the avian flu live virus vaccine on about 200 Polish vagrants, which resulted in 11 immediate deaths and 20 subsequent deaths. This amounted to about 15% of the test population that died. The doctors and nurses involved were charged with murder. This happened in 2008. It obviously makes the point that it is not an exaggeration to say that live virus vaccinations may be extremely dangerous and lethal.

We also saw this lethal effect in the 1960s and 1970s when Australian Aborigine infants began to mysteriously die at astonishing rates—1 of every 2 babies after being vaccinated. Archie Kalokerinos, M.D. eventually made the connection when he realized the babies were dying after being vaccinated against pertussis and other diseases. Heath officials had recently initiated a mass vaccination program to “protect” Aboriginie babies; their deaths corresponded with the program. He wrote a book called “Every Other One” documenting this tragic and preventable event in detail.

Although this is not an analysis of vaccinations in general, it obviously leaks over into this discussion. This however, is a specific exploration of the potential dangers verses the minimal health benefits of live virus vaccines.

4. The swine flu appears to have been laboratory generated and designed to have its dangerous effects amplified by the use of all the available swine flu vaccines.

Although there are some valid humanitarian concerns, based on the pattern of the 1918 swine flu in which the flu came lightly in spring/summer and came back heavily in the fall, which may be fueling this push to vaccinate or go to prison consciousness, there are some very incriminating and questionable facts regarding the intentions behind this massive push. For example, Baxter International Incorporated was in the application process for supplying avian flu vaccinations to European countries in the event of an epidemic when they “accidentally” shipped live avian flu vaccines to 18 countries in Europe. A laboratory technician tested the Baxter Seasonal Flu vaccines sent to the Czech Republic and discovered that they were contaminated with a highly pathogenic version of the avian flu, which could have launched a global pandemic. The total amount of the pathogenic avian flu virus sent to these 18 countries was 72 kilograms (over 150 pounds), which is a lot. Because Level 3 precautions were in place, such contamination “could not have happened accidentally” according to experts in the field. In spite of this so-called “accident”, Baxter was rewarded with a lead role in developing, producing, and disseminating the swine flu vaccine for the labeled “Level 6 pandemic”.

It normally takes a minimum of 12-18 months to create a vaccine after a virus has been identified. How is it that Baxter Laboratories, after receiving the seed culture of the swine flu virus that was provided in May 2009, announced that they would have the vaccine ready by July of 2009. One can’t help but question how they were able to do this in 2 months rather than the usual 12-18 months until we understand the reality of the situation. True Ott, PhD, ND points out that the patent for the Swine Flu vaccine on November 4th, 2005 by Novartis International AG was granted on February 19, 2009 before the Swine Flu “pandemic” even began. The US patent office granted US patent number 20090047353A for a “Split Influenza Vaccine with Adjuvants”. The so-called “Swine Flu” grabbing headlines today is actually a recombinant, or “splitinfluenza” virus consisting of A-strain Bird-Flu (H5N1), Swine Flu (H1N1) and multiple strains of human flu (H3N2)—the 1918 Killer Flu that killed untold millions of people.

According to True Ott, PhD, N.D., Dr. Jeffrey Taubenberger was quite likely the primary author of the Novartis’ Nov. 6, 2005 “provisional” patent application. On page 2, paragraph 32 of the patent publication it says, “The influenza virus [that the ‘invention vaccine’ is designed to protect against] may be a reassortant strain, and may have been obtained by reverse genetics techniques. Reverse genetics techniques allow influenza viruses with desired genome segments to be prepared in vitro using plasmids.” The remnant of the paragraph then goes into very specific detail as to the actual mechanics of how the pandemic virus was actually created by Taubenberger’s Ft. Detrick team. At the very least, the author of the patent application had to have studied Taubenberger’s various published reports on his work at Detrick, for the wording and science is virtually verbatim. As Dr. True Ott points out, this paragraph is even more incriminating by the words “may have been obtained”. Who “obtained” this virus and for what reason was it “obtained”? With this detailed information as it’s explained here, it appears that Novartis then sold the vaccine prototype to its subsidiary—Baxter Laboratories—and possibly other vaccine companies so they could have it ready for the fall. Great timing and a great financial move—create a lab-generated virus and have the vaccines ready to go for phase 2 demands for a vaccine. The more serious issue for the health of the public may be, as Dr. Ott’s evidence shows (http://www.pandemicfluonline.com/) that the Novartis vaccine material with the live virus and squalene adjuvant is designed to facilitate the further mutation of the pandemic into more lethal waves of increasingly virulent and deadly diseases, rather than curtail and limit the existing outbreak.

Other virus experts are aware that this Swine Flu is a laboratory-generated virus. This current swine flu is at best between 4-8% a match in terms of genetic material to its closest genetic relatives and there is no remotely close match in the public NIH databases. This implies that between 92-96% of the viral genetic code is from spliced laboratory genetic material from previous swine, avian, and 1918 human flu viruses. Aware of these insider facts, a significant number of virologists and other health professionals and scientists stated that this had to be produced in a laboratory and could not occur naturally. This includes Adrian Gibbs, the inventor of Tamiflu who has gone on record stating that the very metrics (nucleic acid ratios) as well as genetic history indicates that this virus is passed through eggs, i.e.: it was created in a laboratory situation. Other whistle blowers include world famous virologist, author, and masters in public health, Dr. Leonard Horowitz who has actually identified the highly probable laboratory location and the highly likely scientists who created it. Former NIH employee Alexander S. Jones has done a genetic analysis using data from Andrew Rambaut at the University of Edinberg, which indicates that this virus is mutating approximately 2.3 times faster than any natural swine or avian flu virus has ever done. Although we do not have 100% evidence, for obvious reasons, the overwhelming proof is that this was a laboratory created virus. It is important to note that once a virus undergoes a significant mutation, the vaccine that was made for it is no longer designed for the mutated virus, assuming any clinical effect from the vaccine.

5. The United States government classifies the bird flu virus as a biological weapon.

According to the United States government, in its own export regulations, the bird flu virus has been classified as a biological weapon. Given the evidence, this so called swine flu is a bioengineered virus and therefore a component of a biological weapons system as defined by Section 175(a) of the BWATA (Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989). It is designed like the “bird flu” to “deliver toxins and microorganisms so to deliberately inflict disease and death on people, while being disguised as injections for prophylactic, protective, or other peaceful purposes.” In other words, by their own definition the US accurately views live virus vaccines as potential tools for biological warfare, and in this context, restricts the export of untested, untried, and potentially lethal “experimental vaccines” as biological weapons to rogue nations. The obvious question is why would we attempt to force the same untested and untried potentially lethal live vaccine onto American citizens and particularly our children?

6. If the government intent is to make the live virus squalene adjuvant swine flu vaccination mandatory for all Americans, it is a violation of the Bill of Rights of the Constitution of the United States.

The push behind mandatory vaccinations for the live virus swine flu has reached the highest level in our nation. Although this plan did not start with President Obama, for whatever good or bad intentions, he announced to the public that every man, woman and child should receive the vaccine this fall along with seasonal flu shots. For the record, Obama said he believes vaccinations should be mandatory. Upping this pressure to recklessly vaccinate with an untested live virus vaccine is at best irresponsible as even the statistical scientific evaluation of the effectiveness of flu vaccines suggests all flu vaccinations have had negligible success up until this time. In a scientific review of the data titled: Are US Flu Death Figures More PR Than Science?, it says: “CDC states that the historic 1968-9 “Hong Kong Flu” pandemic killed 34,000 Americans. At the same time, the CDC claims 36,000 Americans annually die from flu.” As of August 2009, the swine flu has killed approximately 1,000 people worldwide, according to CNN, which is a lot less than 36,000. This is hardly a traditionally defined pandemic in terms of numbers, yet there has been a major media fear/panic, which preps the people to take this untested and potentially lethal flu vaccine without even a freedom of choice. An uninformed public without adequate compensation for damages, loss of property, life, liberty, or the pursuit of happiness required under the US Constitution, is not really acting with choice.

The U.S. Constitutional Amendment I states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” Amendment IV secures the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures; Amendment V states that “No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law” and Amendment VIII states, “cruel and unusual punishment [shall not be] inflicted.” In context of the U.S. Constitution, the health and natural immunological adequacy of the human body represents private property and is not to be taken or compromised for “public use, without just compensation.”

At this point live virus flu vaccinations are seen to be mandatory for children and most likely will become mandatory for all Americans with refusal possibly resulting in being put in internment camps. Federal health officials are starting to recommend that most Americans get three flu shots this fall: one regular flu shot and two doses of the live vaccine made against the new swine flu strain. School children who have never had a flu shot are targeted for four shots in the fall—twice for seasonal flu, twice for pandemic swine flu. (July 15, 2009 news). This unprecedented Department of Health’s 2009 flu response plan calls for people—especially children—to receive three or four different live flu virus vaccines simultaneously, which is especially dangerous considering the combining of laboratory-engineered live flu viruses in these vaccines with other viruses resident in the human body (such as seasonal influenza) have the potential be lethal, undermine natural immunity, and/or produce more auto-immune and other diseases in people locally and globally.

The question when considering any medical treatment is what are the risks versus the benefits? We need to look at potential benefits to this or any other flu vaccine to make a reasonable riskbenefit analysis. It is already clear the risks are too high…are they balanced, or a secondary concern as compared to the benefits?

7. Analysis from the British Medical Journal article titled, Influenza Vaccination: Policy Versus Evidence, presents evidence from a systematic review based on a meta-analysis of all the research that shows inactivated vaccines have little or no effect on preventing or minimizing the flu.

The science by our own CDC (Center of Disease Control) shows that flu vaccines are somewhere between 0-14% effective. Research in Israel shows they are 1% effective with a general lowering of the immune system. In general, the most thorough analysis on all the flu vaccine data was reported in the British Medical Journal article entitled Influenza Vaccination: Policy Versus Evidence, which gives evidence from a systematic review based on a metaanalysis of all the research showing that, “inactivated vaccines have little or no effect on the effects measured.” The paper states most studies are of poor methodological quality and little comparative evidence exists on the safety of these vaccines. It shows that in children under 2 years, inactivated vaccines had the same field efficacy as placebo. Similar results were found in an article from The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2 (2008), titled, Vaccines for Preventing Influenza in Healthy Children where review of 51 studies involving more than 294,000 children, found there was “no evidence that injecting children 6-24 months of age with a flu shot was any more effective than placebo.” In children over 2 yrs, it was effective 33% of the time in preventing the flu.

In a study of 800 children with asthma, half were vaccinated and the other half did not receive the influenza vaccine. The two groups were compared with respect to clinic visits, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalizations for asthma. This study failed to provide evidence that the influenza vaccine prevents pediatric asthma exacerbations. (Effectiveness of influenza vaccine for the prevention of asthma exacerbations. Christly, C. et al. Arch Dis Child. 2004 Aug; 89(8): 734-5). The American Thoracic Society’s 105th International Conference, May 15-20, 2009, San Diego quotes: “The inactivated flu vaccine does not prevent influenza-related hospitalizations in children, especially the ones with asthma…In fact, children who get the flu vaccine are three times more at risk for hospitalization than children who do not get the vaccine.”

Vaccines are also minimally effective for adults and the elderly. In a review of 48 reports (more than 66,000 adults), titled: Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults from The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 1 (2006), it quotes, “Vaccination of healthy adults only reduced risk of influenza by 6% and reduced the number of missed work days by less than one day (0.16) days. It did not change the number of people needing to go to hospital or take time off work.” In a review of 64 studies over 98 flu seasons of elderly living in nursing homes, flu shots were non-significant for preventing the flu. For elderly living in the community, vaccines were not (significantly) effective against influenza or pneumonia according to Vaccines for preventing influenza in the elderly: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 3(2006).

Efficacy is a difficult word because it can simply mean the stimulation of antibody production, but we are defining it in terms of protecting you against the flu, which is a practical clinical approach. We have ample clinical evidence and hundreds of testimonies which show that adequate vitamin A, vitamin D, vitamin C, as well as the use of medicinal herbs and mushrooms, can significantly reduce the occurrence of colds and flus far more effectively than a vaccine without all the potential serious side effects these vaccines can cause—including death, Guillain-Barre syndrome (a demyelization of the nervous system that can paralyze a person from the neck down), rheumatoid arthritis, a variety of autoimmune diseases, type 1 diabetes, and autism. In other words, the risk/benefit analysis, which is how we normally assess these kinds of medical decisions, is horrendous. The risks are very high and the benefits are minimal—and we have several options that are more safe and effective.

“FIRST DO NO HARM.” —HIPPOCRATES

If you feel the risks are high and the actual scientific proof of benefits are low…and therefore do not want to take the risk…and prefer others around you do not take the risk (and increase the likelihood of spreading the live virus to you)…there is another obstacle in the path to sovereignty over our own body and mind:

8. Those who refuse the live virus squalene adjuvant swine flu and regular flu vaccinations may be jailed or held indefinitely in internment camps established by states or FEMA because the so-called swine flu pandemic has been, as far as we are concerned, unnecessarily classified as a Level 6 Pandemic, potentially allowing international law to override the United States Constitution to justify American martial law and detention for vaccine refusers.

The United States Emergency Medical Powers Acts and Federal legislation, including the Patriot Acts I, II and III, the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) and others provide for mandatory vaccination or drugging. No exemptions (religious or otherwise) are provided. Those who refuse will be classified as felons at the state level, subject to immediate incarceration and quarantine of indefinite length in jails or other facilities reserved for such “vaccine refusers.” In a frightening “Big Lie” propaganda move, those who doubt the effectiveness of unproven, uninsurable vaccines are being called ” Vaccine Resisters” and being equated to a new form of “terrorism.” Fortunately this desperate attempt to quash reasonable and scientific disagreement and alarm has not been successful so far. Parents and grandparents still have some power to protect their children, grandchildren, and themselves from possible harm. However, by defining this situation as a level 6 pandemic, it allows martial law to potentially take this right of sovereignty away.

Those who refuse at the Federal level may be subject to immediate incarceration and quarantine of indefinite length, probably in FEMA camps already set up across the US.

This means that untested, potentially lethal vaccines and dangerous drugs like Tamiflu could be forced upon people who do not wish them and who would face incarceration or worse if they choose not to accept them. The CDC has said there would be no exemptions and has admitted there would be “a certain amount of human wastage”.

We are urging you to write your local and state representatives communicating the importance of allowing philosophical, religious, and medical exemptions. We are also urging you to pay particular attention to your diet and are urging you to take immune enhancing medicinal mushrooms, herbs, and nano-silver combinations, which are effective immune builders and antivirals.

Such protocols are available at: http://www.treeoflife.nu/whybirdflu.html and in Mike Adams’ book: How to Beat the Bird Flu.

Councilwoman Emily Naeole, of the County of Hawaii, has directed her chief administrators to advance the outlined RESOLUTION to sustain the right to exercise religious freedom to decline this fall’s flu vaccines. This RESOLUTION supports religious families (and philosophical objectors), by their choice and declaration of religious (or philosophical) conviction, from the 2009 flu vaccination program, as per the Hawaii Revised Statutes, Title 19, Department of Health, Chapter 321, Section 11 health rules, that provides such exemptions in non-epidemic periods. This RESOLUTION may apply to anyone in the County of Hawaii, and delivers a message to state and federal health officials to remain in compliance with state, federal, and constitutional laws granting this freedom to choose.

This drafted RESOLUTION can be modified, custom tailored, to serve people in every county and township in the United States.

What this practically means is that “We the People” are issuing notice to preserve a CRITICAL US Constitution Law, according to the Fifth Amendment in Bill of Rights, that says, “No person shall be…deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” Our bodies and our immune systems are our sovereign properties according to Supreme Court decisions, the US Constitution, and international law. Presently there is no form of compensation for the property loss (of natural immune system function) and injury that may result from this live virus vaccination program. Therefore, such action as mandatory vaccination, compromising or utilizing by intoxication a person’s immune system to allegedly protect the “public’s health,” is illegal according to the US Constitution.

THIS RESOLUTION and grass roots action plan can help everyone bring greater awareness and urgent dialogue to our communities and legislative officials, “from the bottom up.” We are strongly recommending this action plan be advanced in every township or county, in every state of America, and involve a local attorney as a volunteer. We are encouraging activists everywhere to advance this urgent and compelling RESOLUTION as a positive action, advancing this novel and compelling legal argument that has been neglected thus far.

Please remember there are more parents, grandparents, alternative, complementary, and natural health professionals, and clergy concerned about these matters, including basic human rights, than there are politicians and drug-makers concerned about making money off vaccinations, and/or depleting world populations. If you want to know more about these two prevalent theories of why this genocidal behavior is being attempted and tolerated please see the websites of Dr. Leonard Horowitz, Mike Adams, pandemicfluonline.com, and/or Conscious-MediaNetwork.com.

At this point in our discussion, it may be useful to consider the wise teachings of Thomas Jefferson:

“WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS TO BE SELF-EVIDENT: THAT ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL; THAT THEY ARE ENDOWED BY THEIR CREATOR WITH CERTAIN UNALIENABLE RIGHTS; THAT AMONG THESE ARE LIFE, LIBERTY, AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS.”

Pursuit of happiness includes health. A person who is not healthy is less likely to be happy and when they are not healthy they have less willpower against slavery. As Thomas Jefferson said,

“THE CARE OF HUMAN LIFE AND HAPPINESS, AND NOT THEIR DESTRUCTION, IS THE FIRST AND ONLY OBJECT OF GOOD GOVERNMENT.”

9. Attempts by the United States government to increase the demand for flu vaccinations through fear are explicitly revealed in a classified, private CDC (Center for Disease Control) sponsor conference for vaccine manufacturer executives entitled “7-step Recipes to Increase Demand for Flu Vaccination”.

It appears as though the will of the US government and the WHO are trying to create a world health government that simply doesn’t acknowledge the sovereign rights of an individual over their own body. There was even a clandestine CDC sponsor conference for vaccine company executives that actually taught a “7-step Recipes to Increase Demand for Flu Vaccination”, which specifically documents techniques designed to frighten people about influenza and increase vaccination rates. Because this attempt to undermine our consciousness and ability to thoughtfully make healthy sovereignty choices over our body is so blatant, it highlights the contradiction between what they say and what is happening. They are attempting to override our right to individual health by creating a bogus definition of pandemic and therefore using this classification as an international justification to use potentially lethal, untested, uninsurable, ineffective, life-destroying vaccines on the public in what appears to be a highly unethical way. This live virus vaccine may actually be the key to setting off a real pandemic.

We know quite well that by building a healthy immune system using herbs, nano-silver, medicinal immune building mushrooms, eating healthy food, focused prayer, and using aromatherapies (which were the only things successful during the black plague), people will have a much higher chance of surviving. As in all disease exposures, a healthy immune system, a sovereign healthy body, and a happy person are the keys to health and the prevention of disease. As one should be able to see from this whole discussion, the activity of the WHO (World Health Organization) with its Codex plan supported by the highest levels of the US government is for the weakening of our health. Attempts by Codex to outlaw supplements, organic foods, and even organic farming (recent attempts stopped by the public action of American citizens of bills HR475 and S825 and in Canada bill 251), are concerted efforts to undermine our immune systems and the quality of our lives.

10. The best way to be protected from any flu including the H1N1 live virus swine flu is to have a healthy immune system by living a natural, earth connected way of being, which includes: organic, plant-source-only foods, supplements including nano-silver, vitamin C, A, and D, medicinal immune building mushrooms and herbs, and specific aromatherapy oils. Physicians of the State of Arizona Board of Homeopathic and Integrated Medicine Society have found that usually one to three Vitamin C IV’s of 50,000 milligrams will give 100% relief from this or any flu in the instance one actually gets the flu. Other effective treatments include nano-silvers and Oxygen Treatment Therapy (OTT). This is a safe, less expensive, simple, and more effective treatment as compared to Tamiflu (Tamiflu, although supposedly designed for the antiviral effect, is a psychotropic drug that has significant brain and nervous system side effects, which are toxic and debilitating). These healthy approaches have been historically proven to be far more safe and effective than generated vaccines, which have truly never been scientifically proven to be either safe or effective except for building the economic pockets of the vaccine companies. In other words, there are strong international and national vested interests on many levels backing these inadequately tested, dangerous, and ineffective vaccines. These vested interest groups are not exactly concerned about your health.

In short summary, there are two key points: (1) The scientific research shows that the swine flu live virus vaccine is not sufficiently tested, and is uninsurable, unnecessary, unsafe, with a horrendously poor risk/benefit ratio. As a result, its use is unconscionable. (2) Contrary to the belief that everyone needs to be vaccinated to protect everyone else, just the opposite is true. The use of a live virus vaccine is actually more likely to spread the infection and make the situation worse, contrary to the mythical belief that is being used to justify mandatory vaccinations. Based on these two points, the research suggests that we have a high-risk situation with very little benefit. It is our feeling that it is the right of the individual to choose to be vaccinated or not in the absence of any compelling evidence whatsoever that mass vaccinations will make a positive difference; people’s right to choose for religious, ethical, medical, or self preservation reasons takes precedence over any state, country, or any supposed world safety issues.

11: We have options and we can create more. It is important that we all take a stand while we are still healthy enough to be standing. Immediate Action Steps

Posted by Vaccine Action at 1:03 PM 2 comments

Immediate Action Steps

11. We have options and we can create more. It is important that we all take a stand while we are still healthy enough to be standing.

• OPTION 1: We have a powerful approach IF EVERYONE CHOOSES TO STAND UP FOR THEIR HEALTH AND WELL-BEING. We are recommending this be the major action people take: Use the template letter included at the end of this document as a helpful format for sending your input to your state and local representatives. Simply personalize and send this template letter to your state governor, state health representatives, state congress people, and your local representatives. Connect with a lawyer and your local county government people, and then your state government people and strongly urge them to commit to definitively support our right to religious, philosophical, and medical exemption to the vaccination program as well as the right to self-quarantine at a location of their own choice.
• The more people who take this action, the more they may be willing at the local and state level and eventually the federal government level to take actions to realize vaccinations are neither safe or effective, and there is no evidence to support herd vaccinations, therefore there is no evidence to support mandatory vaccinations. In this context we are talking about the right of the public citizens to have choice of whether to vaccinate or not, as it is in many other countries. The County of Hawaii Council is an example of such an action. We are advising all peoples, counties, and townships to make such a resolution and then take it to the state level as a major strategy to make this happen. So we are asking you to advance this resolution and educate your community as to why this resolution is urgent and compelling. This is a novel and compelling legal argument that has never been done before. The County of Hawaii Council is also in the process of advancing a county resolution to sustain the right to exercise religious freedom to exempt religious families by their choice and declaration of religious conviction from the 2009 flu vaccination program, as per the Hawaii Revised Statutes, Title 19, Department of Health, Chapter 321, Section 11 health rules, this is to apply to anyone in the county, and to positively demand the state be in compliance with this county resolution. This tactic can be actively applied to every county and township in the United States. What this practically means is that according to the Fifth Amendment in the Bill of Rights of the US Constitution, “No person shall be…deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” Our bodies and our immune systems are our sovereign property according to the law of the US Constitution and international law. Presently there is no form of compensation for the property and injury that may result from this live virus swine flu vaccination.
• Further support of a state-focused campaign comes from Attorney Alan Philips in Chapel Hill, N.C. at vaccinerights.com and pandemicfluonline.com. and also veteran US Constitutional attorney Larry Becraft. Alan has raised a tremendously important point, which is that WHO does not have jurisdiction over the internal affairs of individual member nation states—its jurisdiction concerns the international spread of infectious risk or disease only. That is, the WHO cannot legally mandate vaccines for small town America at the state level. The WHO may exercise strong influence with its recommendations, but ultimately, the final decision for each country lies with the individual country. Similarly, the U.S. federal government lacks authority under the U.S. Constitution to require vaccines of state residents, which is why all vaccine requirements and exemptions for state residents are enacted at the state law level. So, the primary (if not sole) focus for an organized response to the threat of mandatory pandemic flu vaccines should be authorities at the state level.
• It is important to note that non-medical vaccine exemptions available for routine immunizations in most states (i.e., philosophical and/or religious) may not be available if vaccines are mandated in the context of a declared emergency. So it is important to take action now to avoid being forced to choose between an immunization and quarantine, especially since that quarantine could be in a government facility. State laws vary, so be sure to review your state’s emergency laws. It is suggested that if your state laws don’t include a religious or philosophical exemption in an emergency, and also the right to self quarantine at a place of your own choosing, then that is also something we strongly suggest you communicate to your state legislators that they implement such changes in the emergency procedures.
• The PandemicFluOnline.com group has designated August 17-23 as “Pandemic Flu Awareness Week.” Some interpret this as a Call to Action, during which week they intend to write letters to the governor, state secretary of health and human services (or equivalent official in their state), state representatives, and possibly other state public health officials who deal directly with immunization matters. We suggest that you join us in this endeavor, and that you use the one-sentence summary, the one paragraph summary, or the eleven point summary in this paper, and that based on this information, you request or demand the implementation of policy that recognizes and protects citizens’ right to make their own informed decisions about whether or not to take an experimental, minimally tested flu vaccine or be select to other emergency medical treatments or protocols. We also strongly urge public health authorities’ to give assurance that we will be given the right to self-shield, self-quarantine and self-isolate in our homes or other legal locations of our choosing, should shielding, quarantine or isolation be deemed necessary. In this way, through the enactment of better policy and legislation (draft legislation is being completed by the Legal Group at PandemincFluOnline.com as we speak), we can make our voices heard and encourage public health officials to make more informed choices amidst the ongoing fear-based hype and confusion surrounding the pandemic swine flu phenomenon.
• OPTION 2: Contact congress people and senators with mass emails and direct discussion supporting our constitutional right to choice—as has been validated by the Canadian government. It is our responsibility as parents and grandparents, religious people who are sincerely acting as our “brother’s keepers” to invoke the Biblical teaching to preserve health and life, and secular humanitarians to not take this potentially disastrous, deadly immune disordering squalene adjuvant filler live virus immunization. In this discussion it is important to support our right to build and protect our healthy immune systems with the use of healthy food, supplements, medicinal mushrooms and other immune building herbs, and highly effective and safe treatments for the Swine flu virus such as: nano-silvers, Vitamin C IV’s, and OTT (Oxygen Treatment Therapy) a highly potent and safe remedy for the Swine Flu (available at the Tree of Life and at restandrepair.tv).
• We have a constitutional right to sovereignty over our own bodies and our healing. Thomas Jefferson taught that: sovereignty in a true democracy means having the right to choose our own medicines, herbs, and remedies that we deem necessary for our body and for our children; and when and if the government tries to usurp that power for its own agenda we lose sovereignty, health, and democracy and the government loses its validity.
• OPTION 3: Email or fax this information to local TV and radio stations. Call or fax to your State and National political representatives. Try to create town meetings to inform as many people as possible about these issues because informed people are people who can make intelligent choices for the preservation of health and well-being. This could turn out to be the most successful strategy because in the town meetings political action to protect us against the live swine flu vaccination is created.
• OPTION 4: Write a small article for LOCAL, community newspapers. Watch for samples on http://www.PandemicFluOnline.com.
• OPTION 5: Check out http://www.oathkeepers.org. Share this with our local law and military folks. A PDF for easy printing is available online at http://www.Dr.Tenpenny.com.

• OPTION 6: Have at least 3 weeks of food on hand and be prepared for “Self-Shielding”—asserting the right to self-quarantine in your own home or location of your choice.
• OPTION 7: Leave the country. Note: communities are developing outside of the US that will continue the energy of life, harmony, and peace (COL Nicaragua).
• OPTION 8: Go numb, feel hopeless, and take the shot.

SUMMARY CONCLUSION:

There are two reasonable questions that must be asked: (1) Is the swine flu live virus squalene adjuvant vaccine safe and effective, and if so, (2) will vaccinating 95% or more of the general population provide any more protection for the whole population? If both of these questions were answered in the affirmative, then we would have a reasonable justification for mandatory vaccinations. However, the overwhelming scientific data suggests just the opposite. The live virus swine flu has not been adequately tested, proven safe or effective, is non-insurable, and because of the well-known phenomena of Secondary Transmission of live virus vaccines (meaning it can be contagious), it may actually increase the transmission of the virus. This live virus vaccine has 2.3 times more genetic mutability, and added adjuvant toxicity than a natural virus because it includes squalene. Squalene has significant autoimmune inflammatory effects, and general severe autoimmune effects, which are a significant potential threat to the health of the individual. According to congressional hearings in 2004, squalene was considered the main cause of 300,000 GIs with Gulf War Syndrome who are now applying for complete disability. Aside from the horrendous, misery and ill health created by the Gulf War Syndrome, based on our understanding of the 1918 flu pandemic (which some significant scientific work has suggested was precipitated by the water-oil adjuvant that was part of the typhus vaccine and unknowingly given to the soldiers to protect against typhus), it appears that that water-oil adjuvant in combination with the Spanish Flu was the main precipitator of the millions of deaths that occurred. Research at that time, which was limited because they didn’t even know about viruses, suggests that the high percentage of deaths in soldiers (healthy young men) was connected to the adjuvant, which gave them a hyper-immune, auto-immune response and cytokine storm (strong inflammatory reaction) 3 to 6 months after receiving the vaccine. This explains why so many of them died from hemoragenic pneumonia, activated by the viral flu. The use of squalene as an adjuvant in the vaccine, which causes severe health symptoms on its own, could actually mirror the whole 1918 scenario. The interaction of the flu and the hyperimmune auto-immune imbalance response to the squalene (a water-oil adjuvant) could theoretically pre-dispose people who receive the vaccine with this live virus in it to mimic the actual pandemic called the Spanish Flu of 1918. Please understand that this deadly synergy of squalene and the live virus in a vaccine is theoretical and there is no proof that this is the potential case, except the research on the actual cause of the 1918 Spanish Flu. However, this just adds to the potential risk of a squalene-based live virus swine flu vaccination.

According to the British Medical Journal article titled, Influenza Vaccination: Policy Versus Evidence, evidence from a systematic review based on a meta-analysis of all the research shows vaccines have little or no effect on preventing or minimizing the flu.

In other words, the benefit to risk ratio is extremely poor from a scientific point of view. In answering the second part of the question, all the vaccine studies to date show that vaccinating 95% or more of a population does not make a difference in stopping outbreaks of the particular disease people were vaccinated for. In fact, based on the scientific evidence, mass mandatory vaccinations with a highly mutable live virus could actually activate a real and lethal pandemic rather than prevent it. Therefore, from a purely scientific perspective, there is no valid reason for mandatory vaccinations. For this reason we believe that all people have a constitutional, religious, philosophical, and medical right to the freedom of choice of whether or not to be vaccinated.

In essence, as confirmed by veteran US Constitutional attorney Larry Becraft, there is no basis in statutory law for state official mandates, county cooperation, or public compliance, in-so-far-as forced vaccinations and/or quarantines, even during officially declared epidemics or pandemics. Presidential executive orders lack the legal power to force or enforce vaccination and/or quarantine mandates on the American people. Likewise, state statutes and administrative rules and regulations pertaining to compulsory vaccinations and quarantines advanced by health departments shall be prohibited as violations of fundamental human rights, religious freedoms, and just compensation for personal property secured by the US Constitution. Given these conclusions, it is official malfeasance for state and federal health officials to advance such unconstitutional policies and engage such procedures. Furthermore, health officials may be held accountable for gross criminal negligence: engaging in broadcasting flu warnings, using the news media to relay deadly predictions of pandemic morbidity and mortality, or otherwise sensitizing people to promote compliance with vaccination or forced quarantines while grossly neglecting their mental health and quality of life; increasing anxiety, phobia, and depression, and causing severe economic damages from the medical, psychosocial, and behavioral impacts of these public health malpractices. In other words no one has any constitutional authority at the Federal or State level to enforce mandatory vaccinations. However, waiting until legal suits are filed afterwards is not an option because irreversible damage may be done by then to our global family. The State officials are more vulnerable to official malfeasance. In other words, lawsuits on one level also have the immediate power to veto Federal mandates of forced vaccinations. At the state level we have protection from Federal mandates…and in practical reality we have more personal access to state politicians to get them to vote against any Federal mandates, as they are more directly accountable to the public. For further information, please see: http://www.pandemicfluonline.com/.

ONE SENTENCE SUMMARY: The overwhelming scientific studies and research do not in any way support the action of mandatory flu, squalene adjuvant, live virus vaccination; to do so might result in the desecration of a significant amount of God’s creation of humanity on planet earth; the science strongly suggests that mandatory vaccinations are both immoral and ethically illegal (ethics that are core in the Judaic-Christian system) and this mandatory vaccination violates the basic Ten Commandments in at least 6 ways: Thou shall not murder, steal, lie, bear false witness, engage in idol worship (money and power), envy or covet.

“LIBERTY IS TO THE COLLECTIVE BODY, WHAT HEALTH IS TO EVERY INDIVIDUAL BODY. WITHOUT HEALTH NO PLEASURE CAN BE TASTED BY MAN; WITHOUT LIBERTY, NO HAPPINESS CAN BE ENJOYED BY SOCIETY.” –Thomas Jefferso
“NEVER DOUBT THAT A SMALL GROUP OF THOUGHTFUL COMMITTED CITIZENS CAN CHANGE THE WORLD; INDEED IT IS THE ONLY THING THAT EVER HAS.” —Margaret Mead

Posted by Vaccine Action at 1:02 PM 4 comments

Posted by Vaccine Action at 1:01 PM 3 comments

Vaccine Action Template Legislation Letter

[Today’s Date]

[Local State Representative Title]
Physical Address Line 1
Physical Address Line 2
City, State, Zip Code

Dear [State Governor, Department of State Health Representative, State Representatives, County Representatives, City and Local Representatives],

The world research as summarized by the British Medical Journal presents evidence from a systematic review based on a meta-analysis of all the research that shows vaccines have little or no effect on preventing or minimizing the flu. Live virus vaccinations have serious potential side effects, including: death, Guillain-Barre syndrome (a demyelization of the nervous system that can paralyze a person from the neck down), rheumatoid arthritis, a variety of autoimmune diseases, type 1 diabetes, and autism.

The scientific research shows that herd vaccinations (vaccinating over 95% of the population) do not make any difference in protecting the population from the virus and it is scientifically recognized that an attenuated live virus vaccine can be contagious for up to three weeks, which is known as Secondary Transmission. In other words, any reasonable scientific person would conclude that vaccines are neither safe nor effective. The government has made it clear this is the case by not allowing people to make claims against the vaccine companies for the damage that is done. In other words, vaccines are so unsafe that they are uninsurable.

We as parents and grandparents, given the unsafe, ineffective, and uninsurable status of the flu vaccine demand exemption options. In specific, we request the same exemptions allowed for any other vaccine: religious, philosophical, medical, and the right to self-quarantine.

Constitutional legal authorities have made it clear that the WHO and the Federal Government cannot mandate what a nation state does, they can only recommend a position. The state has the final say, and in this context given this information, the lawyers have suggested it may be considered official malfeasance for state and federal health officials to advance such unconstitutional policies and engage in such procedures. I am speaking to you directly to make a difference at the state level by including these exemptions. We know there is not necessarily time to pass a law, but there is time to make implement exemptions in the state emergency procedures, and I am strongly suggesting you do that.

For further information, please contact me, as I am able to give you detailed legal and scientific information explaining this request in more depth.

By Cynthia A. Janak

Around the world, especially in India, the doom and gloom people are telling us that it is going to be catastrophic this fall in the northern hemisphere in regards to cases of the flu. What they are not telling you is that the cases are mild for the majority of the population.

The other thing is that according to the UK experts at the National Institute for Medical Research mentioned that “Analysis done so far suggests what they are dealing with is a mild virus.” “It is believed that a further mutation would be needed in order for the H1N1 virus to cause the mass deaths that have been estimated by some.”

“The swine flu strain is a H1N1 virus, the same type as seasonal flu which circulates throughout the world every year, and kills roughly 0.1% of those infected or higher in an epidemic year.”

“Professor Wendy Barclay, chair in influenza virology at Imperial College London says initial indications suggest there is nothing about the genetic make-up of the new virus which is a cause for particular concern.” http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8028371.stm

The average flu in the United States claims according to the CDC 36,000 people a year. The majority of those people had a pre-existing condition that weakened them and made them more susceptible to the virus.

In this article I am not going to give you all the media reports. I am going to give you the facts behind what you can expect this fall. Look at it this way. When you line up to get your series of flu shots which is going to be either 3 or 4 spaced 2 to 3 weeks apart you will know exactly what is in them. You will look at the syringe that is going to go into the arm of your child or father or mother and know what chemicals are going to go into their bodies. After you read this you will not be able to say that you did not know what was in that shot or jab as they call it overseas.

It is my opinion, the Gardasil girls were just the testing ground for this type of regimen and now many are disabled.

Well, here you go. Here is the information that you need to know and were afraid to ask.

Since March, 2009, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), through the news media, have created the impression that a “novel” strain of H1N1 (swine) flu virus has appeared and that it will mutate and spread pandemically all across the world. Deemed “unstoppable,” the only way to protect the world’s nearly 7 billion people, according to WHO et al, is to “develop” a vaccine, produce nearly five billion doses of it and vaccinate the entire planet — children and pregnant women first.

The evidence, however, shows that the “novel” H1N1 “virus” strain is a product of bio-weapons research and the patented vaccine has been under development for at least four years. The implication of this research undermines the WHO/CDC/media-created impression that a global cooperative of public health officials and vaccine manufacturers are responding appropriately to a pending public health emergency.

CNN reported April 24, 2009 that CDC Influenza Division Director Nancy Cox, PhD, said, “The new virus has genes from North American swine and avian influenza, human influenza, and swine influenza normally found in Asia and Europe.” [1] The next day (April 25, 2009) CNN reported that WHO Epidemic and Pandemic Disease spokesman Gregory Hartl said, “The strain of the virus seen in Mexico is worrisome because it has mutated from older strains.” [2] On May 22, 2009, the World Health Organization’s “Weekly Epidemiological Record” noted that, “Most cases [of swine flu] appear to have uncomplicated, typical influenza-like illness and [afflicted individuals] recover spontaneously.” [3] This appears to be patently true, as the CDC admits that reported death rates per thousands of infections are much lower with this “novel virus” than death rates commonly ascribed to “seasonal” influenza.

On June 11, 2009, the WHO Regional Office for Europe announced, “Today WHO raised the level of influenza A(H1N1) pandemic alert to phase 6, as sustained community-level transmission of the virus is taking place in more than one region of the world. The term pandemic means that an influenza virus that is new to human beings has appeared is spreading and is causing disease in many parts of the world. Globally, it is of moderate severity.” [4] Regardless that the epidemiological data, May, 2009, Novartis received a $289 million order from the US Department of Health and Human Services for A(H1N1) vaccine with proprietary adjuvant MF59© [5]

When a company applies for a patent that means that they have done some research and development of a novel product and they want the rights to that novel product to make money specific to that product for a certain number of years. This is what the dictionary says about patent.

NOUN:

1. 1. A grant made by a government that confers upon the creator of an invention the sole right to make, use, and sell that invention for a set period of time.
   2. Letters patent.
   3. An invention protected by such a grant.
2. 1. A grant made by a government that confers on an individual fee-simple title to public lands.
   2. The official document of such a grant.
   3. The land so granted.
3. An exclusive right or title.

With that out of the way, on February 19, 2009, (take note of the date. This is before the pandemic was announced in Mexico.), a patent was published in regards to a flu vaccine by Novartis. It is patent number US 2009/0047353 A1. (see Novartis patent)

One of the reasons for the creation of this vaccine was to minimize something called “oculorespiratory syndrome” (ORS). What this is per a medical dictionary definition, is “a usually transient syndrome of bilateral red eyes and upper respiratory symptoms, including cough, wheezing, chest discomfort, sore throat, and occasionally facial edema, following influenza vaccination.” http://www.medilexicon.com/medicaldictionary.php?t=88625

According to the WHO they found something interesting reported by Canada during the 2000–2001 flu vaccine season. “Characteristically, the onset of symptoms is 2-24 hours after immunization, more commonly in women than in men, and particularly in the age group 40-59 years. First time recipients and subjects with an allergic predisposition are especially susceptible. It is not clear why there is a special predisposition in these subjects.” And “Cases of ORS were reported in the 2001 vaccination campaign for both vaccines, and people affected previously appeared to have a relatively higher risk of recurrence with revaccination.” http://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/topics/influenza/oculorespiratory_syndrome/en/index.html

My question is this. If it becomes ‘required’ (mandatory) to have the three to four doses of flu vaccine will the people that ‘refuse’ (non-compliant) on the basis of ‘an allergic predisposition’ be instructed (forced) to “self-quarantine” or relocate to an “approved isolation facility”? http://www.hhs.gov/pandemicflu/plan/pdf/HHSPandemicInfluenzaPlan.pdf

Back to the Novartis patent. What we have here is a virus that is obtained by reverse genetics techniques. What this vaccine is in reality a genetically modified virus like particle or virion. They like to call it ‘generating reassortant viruses for vaccine preparation.’

Now, what concerns me here is that GMO (genetically modified organisms) can be harmful. It was reported that in March of 2001, the Center for Disease Control reported that food is responsible for twice the number of illnesses in the U.S. This is around the time we started to eat GM foods. [6]

Let us go on to the ingredients of this wonderful, life saving, innovative, fully tested, pandemic flu vaccine. NOT

The next preferred ingredient is Squalene. Squalene is an essential lipid (oil). Squalene is a cholesterol precursor, which stimulates the immune system nonspecifically. We demonstrate that one intradermal injection of this adjuvant lipid can induce joint-specific inflammation in arthritis-prone DA rats. Histopathological and immunohistochemical analyses revealed erosion of bone and cartilage, and that development of polyarthritis coincided with infiltration of ß+ T cells. — Our demonstration that an autoadjuvant can trigger chronic, immune-mediated joint-specific inflammation may give clues to the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis, and it raises new questions concerning the role of endogenous molecules with adjuvant properties in chronic inflammatory diseases. [7]

There is also a “link between the health problems of Gulf-War veterans and possible presence of squalene in vaccines received by these soldiers has been suggested. One published report has suggested that some army veterans who received anthrax vaccines developed anti-squalene antibodies and that these antibodies caused disabilities.” [8]

We are also going to have vitamin E (tocopherol) as one of the emulsion ingredients along with the squalene. There have been studies performed on rats that with a weekly dose “50 mg of a vitamin E concentrate were found to have fatty changes in the liver. In addition, intimal sclerosis of the aorta was seen, with the over-development of collagenous tissue at the base of the aortic valve and in the medial coat of the aorta.” [9]

A study of female Wistar rats it was found that “Vitamin E depressed body-weight gain at concentrations of 10,000 and 25,000 IU/kg diet, and increased relative heart and spleen weights were seen at 8 months and 16 months,” [10]

The next ingredient of concern is Polysorbate 80 which is a surfactant. What a surfactant does in a vaccine environment is keep the ingredients suspended in a somewhat uniform fashion. This is all well and good because you do not need the ingredients to be of different concentrations in different vials or syringes. There is a much larger concern with Polysorbate 80.

There is “a report that shows that neonatal rats were injected with small doses of polysorbate 80 and the results were major effects on the reproductive organs of the rats, resulting in infertility.” [11] There was a study done on pregnant women by PubMed where “in an intravenous vitamin mix given to a pregnant woman who suffered anaphylactic shock where polysorbate 80 was identified as the causative agent,” [12]

It doesn’t stop there. Now we have 3-O-deacylated monophosphoryl lipid A (3dMPL) added to the mix. Here we have another lipid. This is what I found on this ingredient. “If MPL is immunogenic, it raises the possibility of a dangerous “cross reaction.” The human body is full of lipids. Antibodies and immune cells responding to MPL might also respond to other lipids in the body, thus breaking tolerance for endogenous lipids (those native to the human body) and initiating autoimmunity.” [13]

Now I am going to tell you about my favorite ingredient, Thiomersal or Ethyl mercury. It does not matter what you hear from the main stream media about mercury being in the vaccines because I researched all the vaccines that are approved for a pandemic and many have it in there. It may be only a trace amount but for the majority of vaccines that I have researched it is more than just a trace amount. GlaxoSmithKline uses Thiomersal in all the approved pandemic vaccines that I have found. [14]

You are also looking at having in these vaccines Sodium Chloride, TromeThamine, L-Histidine, Sodium Borate, Sorbitan Trioleate (Span 85 or Tween 85), Aluminum Salts, Aluminum Hydroxide or QS21 (Saponin).

QS21 sounded like another gem when I read this. “QS-21 induced mild local erythema, induration, and tenderness lasting 24-72h in all patients at the 100-mcg dose. The 200-pg dose of QS-21 was associated with local tenderness and inflammation lasting 2-10days in all patients as well as mild flu-like symptoms, including low grade fever (<38.5°C), headache, and myalgia lasting 8-24h after most immunizations. No neurological abnormalities or other side effects were observed.” [15] Why would they be looking at neurological abnormalities or other side effects? This really bothered me.

That is enough for the Novartis vaccine patent. You have to remember that many of the ingredients will also be present in all the other vaccines especially the ingredient Squalene.

Now I want to tell you about something that happens when you get an inoculation, like they are planning, weeks apart. This is called challenge and re-challenge. I am going to reference published case reports of neurological disease following challenge and re-challenge with a hepatitis B vaccine. [16]

“The first pertains to a woman diagnosed with leukoencephalitis following each of her second and third shots of recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (Konstantinou et al., 2001).” [16]

“The second case report pertains to sensorineural deafness (Biacabe et al., 1997). Although the patient appears to have suffered hearing loss twice after vaccination, the time frame is too short to be suggestive of an immunemediated reaction.” [16]

“…tabulation prepared by CDC of case reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) between 1990 and 2001 lists eight cases stating evidence of rechallenge adverse events. These included a variety of clinical descriptions, including neuropathy, MS, and brachial neuritis.” [16]

“Reports included 125 cases of MS, 15 cases of brachial neuritis, 83 cases of optic neuritis, 46 cases of peripheral neuritis, 91 cases of GBS, 30 cases of ADEM or demyelinating disease not otherwise specified, and 109 cases of myelitis. Most of these reports were included in only one outcome category, but some (73) were classified in more than one.” [16]

“The published medical literature provides case reports of several demyelinating diseases following hepatitis B vaccination. These range, for example, from optic neuritis in a 28-year-old man (Albitar et al., 1997), to GBS in a 45-year-old woman (Creange et al., 1999), and transverse myelitis in a 40-year-old health care worker (Tartaglino et al., 1995).” [16]

Here is an animal study using hamsters. “The pathology of Mycoplasma pneumoniae pulmonary infection for a hamster model was examined after whole bacterium rechallenge or component vaccination. Animals which, after an initial infection, were rechallenged with either live or heat-killed M. pneumoniae inocula developed severe early recall lesions in the first 3 days. In contrast, animals infected once develop maximum histopathology at approximately 10-14 days. A severe perivascular inflammatory cellular infiltrate developed in the rechallenged groups, and pulmonary pathology could also be elicited by rechallenge with bacterial growth medium components.” [17]

“Challenge, de-challenge, and re-challenge studies — Challenge, de-challenge and re-challenge studies are useful in suggesting causation. In some cases, however, only a second challenge will result in an AE. Sometime the AE after a challenge is long-lasting and does not exhibit a de-challenge response after the treatment is stopped. Re-challenge can be considered positive when a similar, but not identical, treatment is applied (for example, when another member of the same drug class, a nearly identical vaccine, or a drug with to a shared vaccine component is used).” [18]

I want to bring your attention to the comment, “only a second challenge will result in an AE” (adverse event). This is what happened with many of the Gardasil girls. They did not have any noticeable symptoms after the first shot but when they received the second or third shot that is when the symptoms manifested themselves. Now many of them are on the GFCF diets, taking vitamins and going to the chiropractor for some relief. They did not experience the “de-challenge” as stated in the previous paragraph. Many of the girls have been having medical problems for over 2 years now and the recovery is very, very slow.

The last item of concern is that the pandemic flu vaccines have been authorized to be co-administered with other vaccines on the schedule. (see Novartis patent) This is of paramount importance to me because as I was researching those vaccines for ingredient content I found more mercury, aluminum and other ingredients. If you add together the amount of ingredients that a person or child will be receiving you have the very real potential to be over the safe limit for the chemicals. [19]

There you have it, all the information that you really did not want to know about the upcoming immunization program with the pandemic and standard flu vaccines. Now it is up to you to make the decision if you want to get vaccinated with the vaccines that they propose. I know that after all my research which spanned over 2 weeks, over 10 hours a day, I am not going to do it. I guess I am going to be one of those “non-compliant” that is going to be “required” to be “self-quarantined” or put in an “approved isolation facility.” I also do not believe in putting foreign chemicals or DNA in my finely balanced body provided by my Creator.

NOTES:

To see actual statement delivered in the Press Briefing Transcripts, CDC Briefing on Public Health Investigation of Human Cases of Swine Influenza, April 23, 2009, 3:30 p.m. EST, http://www.cdc.gov/media/transcripts/2009/t090423.htm

COX: Thank you very much. The virus that has caused these infections is viruses are actually very interesting. They contain genetic segments as Dr. Schuchat said from four different virus sources.So we have some gene segments that are North American swine influenza viruses. Some gene segments North American avian influenza viruses. One gene segment from a human influenza virus and two gene segments that are normally found from swine influenza viruses in Asia and in Europe.