Alternative Healing, HEALING US, Vaccination, Vaccinations, Vaccines

Natural Alternatives to Replace Flu Shots

1 Comment 30 October 2011

 

Natural Alternatives to

Replace Flu Shots

 Nathan Batalion, Global Health Activist, Healingtalks Editor

(Healingtalks) With the flu season coming up soon, many turn to vaccinations as the best “preventive” approach. Those who do not are often accused of being uneducated or irresponsible. Nothing could be further from the truth. Actually natural alternatives are the more educated, knowledgeable and wiser  way to go.

Vaccinations Not Backed By Real Science

The aggressive call for vaccinations is driven  economic and political motivations, not by real science.

It is a guarded secret within the medical establishment (especially the CDC) that the Cochrane Database Review, which is the gold standard for evidence-based medical models and evaluating common medical interventions, does not lend clear scientific support to the belief and/or propaganda that flu vaccines are safe and effective.

To the contrary, these authoritative reviews reveal no evidence as to the effectiveness of influenza vaccines in children under 2, healthy adults, the elderly, and healthcare workers who care for the elderly. Only one safety study on inactivated flu vaccines has been performed in children under 2 (the population most susceptible to adverse reactions), even though in the USA and Canada current guidelines recommend the vaccination of healthy children from six months old. Following the global pandemic declared by the World Health Organization in 2009 and the seasonal flu vaccinations among Canadians, there was actually an increased the rate of H1N1 infections. Vaccines, therefore, may actually decrease resistance to viral infection via their immunosuppressive actions. View study.

Also trivalent (3-strained) influenzavaccines are incapable of protecting us against the wide range of pathogens which produce influenza-like symptoms. Over 200 viruses cause influenza and influenza-like ailments which produce the very same symptoms (fever, headache, aches and pains, cough and runny noses). Without laboratory tests, doctors cannot tell various flu-mocking illnesses apart. The real thing and the copy-cats both last for days and rarely lead to death or serious illness. Stretching reality at best, vaccines might be effective against only Influenza A and B, which represent about 10% of all circulating viruses.(According to Cochrane Database). It is exceedingly clear thus that it is a mathematical impossibility for influenza vaccines to be effective for wild-circulating strains of influenza.

What the vaccination process does is to artificially co-opt a natural process – and with documented side-effecting consequences. Vaccine proponents would have us believe natural immunity is inferior and should be replaced. But the side-effects, some of them serious, prove otherwise.

What happens is that economic motifs corrupt real the industry’s concerns for real health needs. And because vaccines actually don’t work, there is a hugely desperate need to deceptively find a way to “scientifically prove” they do. Billions are at stake.  A chemical kitchen sink is further added for a more intense response — like kicking a buzzing beehive to stir up the bees to a frenzy. These toxic chemicals include detergents, anti-freeze, heavy metals, DNA from aborted human fetuses (diploid cells) and other frightening stuff – including mercury, one of the most potent toxin on the planet.

Replacing Flu Vaccinations: The Hows and Whys

A) Allowing for Natural Immunity

For a person with a healthy immune system, periodic infections are not to be feared. This is because such infections challenge and strengthen that immune system. This is Nature’s immunization. So what we need is more people with healthy immune systems to begin with.

B) Immune Status Determines Susceptibility to Infection

Immune status determines viral susceptibility. If the immune system is overwhelming by environmental toxins, pharmaceutical toxins,  nutritional deficiencies and chronic stress, influenza is more likely to take hold. It is not a lack of a vaccination that causes infection, rather, the inability of the immune system to handle the presence of a virus.

C) Basic Immune-Boosting Approach

Our immune system is nothing more than an expression of what all of healing is about – the natural and internal pulling together of our body, mind and spirit. There are four ways to best strengthen that and they are the four pillars of natural therapies: optimal nutrition, periodic detoxification, mind/body work and exercise or improving circulation.
You want the
  • Best in
  • Worst out
  • To circulate both, and
  • Have the consciousness to keep on course.
DIET – The  best immune-boosting diet is plant-based. Optimally it should at least be 80% raw.
DETOX - Enhanced and periodic detoxification can be as simple as having regular saunas or enough exercise to build up a sweat. It can also include skin brushing when taking a shower or having a juice fast or liquid diet once a week.
EXERCISE – Regular exercise helps speed metabolism for both optimal nutrition and detoxification.
MIND – BODY  This kind of inner work can include stress reduction, meditation, prayer and positive thinking.
Adequate sleep should also not be forgotten.
SUPPLEMENTS – It can be supplemented by superfoods, vitamins, herbs and spices that enhance the healing power of natural, whole, organic foods.

90%/10%

Imagine that mastering one’s diet, detoxing, exercise and mind/body work together comprise 90% of the battle and that supplements, while important, add only about 10%  more effectiveness.
But a commercial society corrupts that perspective.
We emphasize little shots, pills, supplements, and drugs as coming to our rescue – various external isolates -  and not so much because they are best to take but because they are what sells the best for someone to make a living or a literal “killing.”
We are not usually taught  that a) dollar signs are math symbols where mathematics abstracts separation. We can count three apples only if they are separate, and not if we make applesauce. Thus dollar signs best connect to separate things  – vials of a vaccine or bottles filled with separate  pills of the same measurement. It also connects best to foods that are remade into a  “separative” -or fixated form – thus dead or preserved with chemical preservatives.
Real healing, however, involves depth connection or connection to wholeness and not what is separative.
Months to years  on an optimal diet, with regular detoxing,  exercise and mind/body work is what is going to make the greatest difference in our lives as to our health.
But we have internalized the deceptions of our commercial society to expect and demand the right rescuing pharmaceutical pill or even natural pill remedy.
Still supplements have great value… just not as much as promised or as we have made them out to be.

Supplement Suggestions

Vitamin D

This deserves special consideration due to the fact that it is indispensable to produce antiviral peptides (e.g. cathelicidin) within the immune system, and can be supported for pennies a day. It serves to help us in the winter months when there is less sunlight to produce natural vitamin D. A study published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition in 2010, revealed that children receiving 1200 IUs of vitamin D a day were at 59% reduced risk for contracting seasonal Influenza A infection. Moreover as a secondary outcome, only 2 children in the treatment group versus 12 for the control group, experienced an asthma attack.

Other recommendations

Echinacea Tea:             J Altern Complement Med. 2000 Aug;6(4):327-34
Elderberry:                    J Altern Complement Med. 1995 Winter;1(4):361-9.
Green Tea:                     J Nutr. 2011 Oct ;141(10):1862-70. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
Probiotics:                      Pediatrics. 2009 Aug;124(2):e172-9.
Sayer Ji                          GreenMedInfo
 

Keywords: children immunization, child immunization, childhood immunization, health immunization, information about vaccination, vaccine programs, immunization risks, vaccination dangers.

Halloween, HEALING US, Holiday Posts, Vaccinations, Vaccines

Halloween Spooky: Vaccine study shows influenza vaccines prevent flu in only 1.5% of adults (not 60% as told)

No Comments 29 October 2011

 

influenza vaccines prevent flu

Halloween Special

Shock vaccine study: 

influenza vaccines prevent flu in only 1.5% of adults

(not 60% as told)

Nathan Batalion, Global Health Activist, Healingtalks Editor

(Healingtalks) This article is about something quite scary to mention, unless everyone was aware of the vast corruption of consciousness in modern mega-$-generating medicine – what is so systemic.

A recent study published in Lancet shows that their very best and contrived, manipulated, industry-supporting study only could show that influenza vaccines helped just 1.5% of adults – maybe- and via something almost statistically insignificant. Nevertheless, the  very same study is being broadcast throughout mainstream media  as proof that “flu vaccines are 60% effective!”  Supposedly this was a disappointment because the previous claims were for 70-90% effectiveness. See references for such false and widespread industry reporting at the end of this article. So what else is new. The unbridled manipulation of truth is commonplace but remains VERY VERY SCARY indeed.

Flu vaccine stops influenza for just and only 1.5%…..maybe!

In this study the control group of adults consisted of about 13,000 non-vaccinated adults.

Only 2.7% of these caught the flu.

The treatment group were vaccinated with  trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine.

1.2% of them did not catch the flu.

The difference is, using simple math, just 1.5%

Statistical Games

But if you take the 2.7% in the control group and you divide that into the 1.2% in the treatment group, this gives you 0.43 and implies a “57% decrease” in influenza infections. The overall “60% effectiveness” being claimed for this study is thus a statistical hoax and sham. Actually 1.5% of the patients had any incrementally positive response, and even that is disputable.  So when the media (or your doctor) says these vaccines are “60% effective,” what they don’t tell you  is that when you inject 100 adults the result is that only  1.5 of them somehow avoid the flu and it has no positive impact on the rest, or 98.5% of the time and for the general population.

Any harmed by influenza shots, mammograms and chemotherapy? A similar story of a devilish manipulation of truth

Harmful effects are also not the focus, almost never, of such product-marketing, pro-industry studies, funded by Big-Pharma supporting groups to make their bankrupt case.So if we guess, for example, that 7.5% show long-term neurological side effects – a quite reasonable guess given the vast data we have about such harmful impacts – or 5 times as many hurt as helped – then this would mean we all are 500% more likely to be harmed than healed by submitting to the shot!

The same is true with mammograms that harm approximately 10 women for every 1 they may help (http://www.naturalnews.com/020829.html).

It is the same with chemotherapy with a best, and disputable, track record of helping 3% of those treated and failing with the other 97%. And again the successful cases are disputable. Just because a tumor shrinks doesn’t mean someone is truly healed. Chemotherapy may shrink tumors, receiving ovations, while eventually the patient dies because same toxic and lethal chemo tends to kill most who receive it.

“Cancer survivors” after chemotherapy might better be described as “chemo survivors.”

 

The rest we may bless with R.I.P.s, may they “rest in peace” having been subjected to the cancer industry’s RIP offs.

Quoth the Raven Never More

According to the same study, 12 out of 100 children were helped. But this data is almost certainly largely falsified in favor of the vaccine industry, as explained below. It ignores frightening harms, including a MAJOR vaccine/autism link.

So if you are thinking of giving your child a flu shot, remember Edgar Allen Poe’s admonition – “Quoth the Raven Never More!

Funding

The funding for this abysmal study came from the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation whose Vice President for Human Resources and Program Management is Gail Pesyna, a former DuPont executive (working for the second largest GMO firm) and with special expertise in pharmaceuticals and medical diagnostics. (http://www.sloan.org/bio/item/10)

Alred P. Sloan Foundation alsgave a $650,000 grant to fund the creation of a film called “Shots in the Dark: The Wayward Search for an AIDS Vaccine,” (http://www.sloan.org/assets/files/a…) which features a highly pro-vaccine slant.

Credibility

Control group was often given a vaccine, too

In many of the studies used in this meta analysis, the “control” groups were given so-called “insert” vaccines which may have contained chemical adjuvants and other additives but not attenuated viruses. Why does this matter? Because the adjuvants can cause immune system disorders that make the control group more susceptible to influenza.

Flu vaccines not tested against never-vaccinated healthy children

Testing healthy, non-vaccinated children against vaccinated children is something that is never done. It’s no surprise, therefore, that flu shots were simply not tested against “never vaccinated” children who have avoided flu shots for their entire lives. That would be a real test, huh? But of course you will never see that test conducted because it would make flu shots look laughably useless by comparison.

Influenza vaccines not tested against vitamin D user

Vitamin D prevents influenza at a rate that is 8 times more effective than flu shots (http://www.naturalnews.com/029760_v…).

No long-term studies

Vaccines are considered “effective” if they merely prevent the flu. But what if they also cause a 50% increase in Alzheimer’s two decades later?  There is no desire in the industry to observe and record the actual long-term results of vaccines because the negative results would defeat their marketing purposes.

Lancet is a pro-vaccine mouthpiece funded by the vaccine industry!

Trusting The Lancet to report on the effectiveness of vaccines is foolish. Does anyone really think we’re going to get a truthful report from a medical journal that depends on vaccine company revenues?

Even when pro-vaccine medical journals publish pro-vaccine studies, their best data shows flu vaccines prevent influenza in only 1.5 out of 100 adults!

If these studies were done with no $$ ties to Big Pharma, might they have been worse? You betcha. They would probably show a stark negative efficacy rate, meaning that flu shots cause more influenza cases than they prevent. That’s the more likely reality.

Flu shots do cause incidences. That’s why the people who get sick every winter with the flu are often the very same people who got flu shots to prevent the same! Do your own survey and just ask ‘em yourself this coming winter.

Diabolical Beliefs

Thanks to the vast lies of the industry, most people believe flu shots help them, which can alone account for 1.5% less incidences, the power of the mind – again being statistically insignificant.

So next time you see adults lined up at a pharmacy for their flu shots, know that nearly 99 out of those 100 are wasting their time and money and may be subjecting themselves to considerable long-term neurological damage.

Someday may take on the persona of Frankenstein.

Fraudulent marketing

Given this 1.5% effectiveness, the marketing of flu shots is, according to Mike Adams, one of the most outrageous examples of fraudulent marketing ever witnessed in modern or any society.

Can you imagine a car company selling a car that only worked 1.5% of the time? Or a computer company selling a computer that only worked 1.5% of the time? They would be indicted for fraud!

So why does the vaccine industry get away with this?

This puts flu shots in roughly the same efficacy category as rubbing a rabbit’s foot or wishing really hard. But this is commonly what passes for “science” in a greed hungry industry that most maintain billions of dollars in sales to satisfy stockholders.

Trick or Treat

Getting others to buy something useless and that might  harm is quite a trick, not a treat.

How to pull this off? Just shroud the process under  some “science” jargon and offer prizes to the pharmacy workers who cajole customers to get injected. That’s how its done!

Don’t want to know?

What are flu shots really for? Vaccines are population control technologies, as openly admitted by Bill Gates (http://www.naturalnews.com/029911_v…). They are so cleverly packaged under the fabricated “public health” message that even those who administer vaccines have no idea they are actually engaged in the reduction of human population through vaccine-induced infertility and genetic mutations. Vaccines ultimately have but one purpose: to “weed out” those humans who are stupid enough to fall for vaccine propaganda. For that purpose, they probably are 60% effective after all.

Resources

Flu Vaccines — The Mainstream Admits, We Want an Epidemic!
http://liamscheff.com/2011/10/flu-v…

Vaccine Liberation

 


Related Articles

Say No To Frankencandy On This Halloween

What’s Really Spooky About Halloween


Keywords

symptoms of the flu, flu viruses, vaccines for the flu, flu shot vaccines,  vaccine influenza, effects of the flu,  influenza vaccination, having the flu, flu viruses, flu injection, flu vaccination, cold and flu.

Based on an article by Mike Adams, published at naturalnews.com

Infowars interview on the subject:

Our favorite scary speech by Bill Gates:

SAMPLE MAINSTREAM MEDIA ARTICLE

AHN All Headline News

AOL Healthy Living

MSNBC

Reuters and Yahoo News

 

 

 

 

 

Conventional Medicine, HEALING US, Vaccinations, Vaccines

TAKING DOWN TIMES SQUARE BILLBOARD WITH VACCINE MESSAGE

No Comments 02 August 2011

Taking Down Times Square’s Billboard With Informed Vaccine Choices Message

Story Behind

Taking Down

Times Square Billboard -

Its Informed

Vaccine Choices

Message

Based on an article by Barbara Loe Fisher

(Healingtalks) It is a short 15 second public service message on the CBS Jumbotron on Times Square in New York City that encourages everyone to make informed vaccine choices. The message is sponsored by the nonprofit charity, the National Vaccine Information Center, and made possible by a donation from Mercola.com. It has been shown hourly since March 22, 2011 alongside much bigger ads for a variety of products marketed by large corporations.1

American Academy of Pediatrics Strong Arms CBS

On April 13, the President of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) sent a letter to CBS containing misinformation about NVIC in an attempt to strong arm the network into taking the vaccine education message down before it was scheduled to end on April 28. The AAP letter was provided to bloggers,2 , 3 who orchestrated an online smear campaign against NVIC and created a petition drive to increase pressure on CBS. Mainstream media outlets like The Guardian in Great Britain republished the AAP’s attack and added more disinformation.4

Follow Big Pharma Money

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) is a trade association with 60,000 pediatrician members that publishes guidelines for giving vaccines to children. In recent years, the public has learned that the AAP has been taking lots of money from vaccine manufacturers and refusing to disclose to the media just how much money it gets from Big Pharma.5

In the early 1980′s, the AAP lobbied Congress to give pediatricians and drug companies liability protection from vaccine injury lawsuits while parents of DPT vaccine injured children worked hard to get vaccine safety and informed consent provisions in the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986,6 which has already paid out more than 2 billion dollars in federal compensation to children and adults harmed by vaccines.7 Today, when a pediatrician continues to vaccinate a child after the child has experienced vaccine reactions that get worse after each round of shots, that pediatrician is not held liable in a civil court of law when the child ends up brain damaged or dead because of the pediatrician’s negligence.

AAP: Censoring Vaccine Information

This, together with the fact that in February 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court gave drug companies a bigger shield8 from vaccine injury lawsuits – even if the company could have made a safer vaccine – means that the only power Americans have left to protect ourselves from vaccine injury is to arm ourselves with information and defend the legal right to make vaccine choices.9 But, clearly, that is getting harder to do when doctors and organizations paid by the pharmaceutical industry are trying to censor vaccine information and block all public conversation about vaccination, while lobbying to take away the human right to informed consent to medical risking taking.10 , 11 , 12 , 13

Dr. Paul Offit: Follow the Money

One of those doctors paid a lot of money by Big Pharma is Dr. Paul Offit.14 He creates new vaccines and has made a career out of denying vaccine risks and defaming people,15 , 16 , 17 , 18 who disagree with his unscientific opinions like his cavalier insistence that it would be safe to give a child 10,000 vaccines at once.19 He delights in spreading misinformation about parents of vaccine injured children,20 doctors helping those children,21 and journalists trying to cover both sides of the vaccine safety debate.

Offit spent a large part of his new book demonizing me and NVIC with the half witted, zealous obsession of a stalker.22 Just this week, a newspaper in Orange County, CA published a retraction23 for printing Offit’s defamatory accusation that veteran CBS journalist, Sharyl Attkisson, lied when she accurately reported in 2008 that Offit failed to inform CBS about exactly how much money he and his employer, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, are paid by Merck. Merck is the manufacturer and marketer of Vioxx and a whole slew of vaccines, including Offit’s rotavirus vaccine and Gardasil, hepatitis B, chicken pox, shingles and MMR vaccines.24

Doctors Deceptively Demanding We Must Trust Them

Why should we care about influential doctors, who take big money from Big Pharma, and then spend a lot of their time viciously attacking anyone daring to suggest that vaccines and vaccine policies could be made safer?

We should care because doctors don’t just ask but, increasingly, demand that we trust them with our health and the health of our children. Many pediatricians, who are now giving children six dozen doses of 16 vaccines starting on the day of birth,25 throw parents out of their office if they dare to ask too many questions about vaccination or ask for fewer vaccines to be given at once.26 , 27 , 28 While the AAP is promoting the idea that every child must live in a “family-centered medical home” so pediatricians can “oversee” children’s health,29 including giving children three times as many vaccinations as children got three decades ago, there are hundreds of new vaccines in the research pipeline.30 , 31

New Vaccines, New Mandates, BIG Profits

How many of these hundreds of new vaccines will be fast tracked by the FDA32 , 33 and mandated for children as soon as they are licensed?34 Probably most of them, because that is how drug companies with no liability make big profits – by making sure that every vaccine they make and sell is legally required to be used by every child. And adults are not exempt from the vaccine mandate creep either, just ask American health care workers, who are being fired if they don’t get an annual flu shot,35 as well as lots of other vaccines.

Doctors Should Partner With Parents to Prevent Vaccine Reactions

But what about the children, for whom the risks of vaccination are 100 percent? What about them? Aren’t their lives worth saving, too?

Shouldn’t organizations like the American Academy of Pediatrics be doing everything they can to teach their members about how to be partners with parents in preventing vaccine reactions instead of throwing families out of their offices and attacking organizations like NVIC representing families, whose loved ones have suffered life-altering vaccine reactions?

Thirty years ago, when I took my healthy, precocious two and a half year old son into his pediatrician for his fourth DPT shot, I was told nothing about how to recognize a vaccine reaction. He had experienced an extremely severe local reaction after his third DPT shot but I did not understand the significance of that and neither did my pediatrician. So another DPT shot was given and I watched my child suffer a convulsion, collapse, and experience many hours of unconsciousness shortly after his vaccination and did not realize he was experiencing a brain inflammation that would change his life and mine forever.

Brain Inflammation: From Infections and Vaccines

Brain inflammation36 is one of the most feared complications of vaccination and has been since the first vaccines – smallpox and rabies vaccines – were created and given to humans. 37 , 38 Doctors have known for more than a century that brain inflammation,39 whether it is caused by an infection or a vaccination,40 , 41 , 42 can cause different kinds of permanent brain dysfunction that ranges from multiple learning disabilities to medication resistant seizure disorders, mental retardation43 and, yes, sometimes can result in a constellation of brain dysfunction symptoms that are labeled by doctors as “autism.” 44 , 45

In the book, DPT: A Shot in the Dark, published a quarter century ago, there are many case histories of children, whose pediatricians did not tell mothers about how to recognize the symptoms of vaccine reactions and those children were revaccinated over and over again until they were permanently brain damaged or died.46 A number of these children came from families with strong medical histories of allergy and autoimmunity, like my family,47 which the pediatricians dismissed as unimportant.

Writing Off Vaccine Reaction Symptoms Is Dangerous

Too often doctors today – just like doctors back in the 1980′s – are not telling parents about what to look for after vaccines are given. Too many pediatricians today are listening to the advice of Paul Offit48 , 49 and, instead of adhering to the precautionary principle, are dangerously writing off symptoms of vaccine reactions as a “coincidence” without having a clue about whether that is true for an individual child.

At the National Vaccine Information Center, where we have been collecting information on vaccine reactions since 1982, it is clear to us that more than 50 percent of all vaccine injuries and deaths could potentially be prevented if doctors and parents were educated about what a vaccine reaction looks like and if pediatricians were much more cautious about re-vaccinating children when a child gets sicker and sicker after each round of shots.50, 51 , 52

Learn How to Make Informed Vaccine Choices

Because your pediatrician may not tell you how to recognize a symptom of a vaccine reaction, you can download the brochure “If You Vaccinate, Ask 8 Questions” from NVIC’s website. It contains a list of vaccine reactions to look for like high pitched screaming and collapse/shock and seizures.53 At NVIC’s website, you can also access vaccine product information published by the vaccine manufacturers and the FDA, as well as do your own research about vaccine reactions reported to the federal government.54 You can access a Vaccine Ingredient Calculator that educates you about vaccine components and how to make informed vaccine choices.55

And remember, if your child suffers symptoms of marked deterioration in physical, mental or emotional health after vaccination, you need to make sure your pediatrician writes down those symptoms in the child’s permanent medical record.

One Size Vaccine Does Not Fit All

America’s children would be better served if the American Academy of Pediatrics leadership educated its membership about how to be intelligent, compassionate partners with parents in preventing vaccine reactions, injuries and deaths rather than write off symptoms of vaccine reactions as a “coincidence” and bully parents into submitting to one-size-fits-all vaccine policies that are not safe for every single child. People are not all the same and we do not all react the same way to pharmaceutical drugs and vaccines.56 Some children are genetically and biologically at higher risk for suffering life-altering vaccine reactions.57

Pretending that is not true is both intellectually dishonest and cruel.

No child is expendable and no pediatrician should be encouraged to be a zealous implementer of state vaccine policy first instead of, first, doing no harm.

Click here to read NVIC’s April 25, 2011 Businesswire press release.

Click here to read the April 18, 2011 Letter from Barbara Loe Fisher, President, National Vaccine Information Center, to O. Marion Burton, MD, FAAP, President of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Click here to read the April 18, 2011 Letter from Barbara Loe Fisher, President, NVIC, to Leslie Moonves, President, CBS.

References:


Sources:

National Vaccine Information Center April 21, 2011

BusinessWire April 25, 2011

Salon.com April 25, 2011

American Council on Science & Health April 14, 2011

The Guardian April 18, 2011

Keyword tags – vaccine message, complications of vaccination, informed vaccine choices, taking down times square’s billboard

Vaccinations, Vaccines

Vaccines: Get the Full Story – Protecting Your Child and Yourself

No Comments 26 July 2011

vaccination get the full story

Vaccines:

Get the Full Story

Protecting Your Child

and Yourself

PHYSICIANS SIGNING ONTO THIS REPORT

Nicola Antonucci, MD
Todd M. Elsner, DC
Alexander Kotok, MD, PhD
Máximo Sandín, PhD
David Ayoub, MD
Jorge Esteves, MD
Eneko Landaburu, MD
Len Saputo, MD
Nancy Turner Banks, MD
Edward “Ted” Fogarty, MD
Luc Lemaire, DC
Michael Schachter, MD
Timur Baruti, MD
Jack Forbush, DO
Janet Levatin, MD
Viera Scheibner, PhD
Danny Beard, DC
Milani Gabriele, CRNA, RN
Thomas Levy, MD, JD
Penelope Shar, MD
Françoise Berthoud, MD
Sheila Gibson, MD, BSc
Stephen L’Hommedieu, DC
Bruce Shelton, MD, MD(H)
Russell Blaylock, MD
Mike Godfrey, MBBS
Paul Maher, MD, MPH
Debbi Silverman, MD
Fred Bloem, MD
Isaac Golden, ND
Andrew Maniotis, PhD
Kenneth “KP” Stoller, MD
Laura Bridgman, FNP, ND
Gary Goldman, PhD
Steve Marini, PhD, DC
Terri Su, MD
Kelly Brogan, MD
Garry Gordon, MD, DO, MD(H)
Juan Manuel Martínez Méndez, MD
Didier Tarte, MD
Sarah Buckley, MD
Doug Graham, DC
Sue McIntosh, MD
Leigh Ann Tatnall, RN
Rashid Buttar, DO
Boyd Haley, PhD
Richard Moskowitz, MD
Adiel Tel‐Oren, MD, DC
Harold Buttram, MD
Gayl Hamilton, MD
Sheri Nakken, RN, MA
Sherri Tenpenny, DO
Lisa Cantrell, RN
Linda Hegstrand, MD, PhD
Christiane Northrup, MD
Renee Tocco, DC
Lua Català Ferrer, MD
James Howenstine, MD
Amber Passini, MD
Demetra Vagias, MD, ND
Jennifer Craig, PhD, BSN, MA
Suzanne Humphries, MD
Ronald Peters, MD, MPH
Franco Verzella, MD
Robert Davidson, MD, PhD
Belén Igual Diaz, MD
Jean Pilette, MD
Julian Whitaker, MD
Ana de Leo, MD
Philip Incao, MD
Pat Rattigan, ND
Ronald Whitmont, MD
Carlos de Quero Kops, MD
Joyce Johnson, ND
Zoltan Rona, MD, MSc
Betty Wood, MD
Carolyn Dean, MD, ND
A. Majid Katme, MBBCh, DPM
Chaim Rosenthal, MD
Eduardo Ángel Yahbes, MD
Mayer Eisenstein, MD, JD, MPH
Tedd Koren, DC
Robert Rowen, MD

The above signatories represent a spectrum that includes pediatricians, family physicians, brain surgeons, and professors of pathology, chemistry, biology and immunology. All have independently researched the real science and have come to the conclusions you will read about in this document. MD, DO, MB, MBBCh all indicate a doctor of medicine. ND indicates a medically trained and licensed doctor in some areas. FNP indicates a family nurse practitioner.
Ever wonder why doctors can’t find the cause for many diseases? It’s because they are conditioned to ignore the relationship between illness and vaccines.

Diseases Caused by Vaccinations

These are some of the diseases that have documented associations with vaccines:

  • Allergies and eczema
  • Arthritis
  • Asthma
  • Autism
  • Acid reflux requiring an infant to take proton pump inhibitors, which have many side effects
  • Cancer
  • Diabetes (infant and childhood)
  • Kidney disease
  • Miscarriages
  • Long list of neurological and autoimmune diseases
  • Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS)
  • And many, many more

Side Effects Caused By Vaccinations

These are some known vaccine side effects, documented in medical literature and/or in package inserts:

  • Arthritis, bleeding disorders, blood clots, heart attacks, sepsis
  • Ear infections
  • Fainting (with reports of broken bones)
  • Kidney failure requiring dialysis
  • Seizures/epilepsy
  • Severe allergic reactions, such as hives and anaphylaxis
  • Sudden death
  • Many common diagnoses given for hospital admissions.
  • The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, (NVICP) has awarded more than $1.2 billion in damages to children and adults injured by vaccines.

Autism Is Associated With Vaccines

Autism was rare until the mass vaccination programs were accelerated in 1991, with the introduction of the hepatitis B vaccine and the HiB (meningitis) vaccine. Tens of thousands of parents will attest that autism appeared in their children very soon after they were given these, and other, vaccines. Study the information on the website www.fourteenstudies.org. You will find the studies denying the association between autism and vaccines to be highly questionable.

Other Vaccine Facts

  • Drug companies, insurance companies and the medical system get rich when you get sick.
  • Vaccines do not give life‐long immunity, which means booster shots are recommended.
  • Each booster shot increases the risk of more side effects.
  • Vaccine side effects can make you sick for the rest of your life. Conveniently, there are many drugs to treat the side effects caused by vaccines.
  • In the U.S., neither drug companies nor doctors can be sued when something bad happens from a vaccination. Both are protected by the 1986 National Child Vaccine Injury Act. This law, signed into effect by then‐president Ronald Reagan decreed: “No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine‐related injury or death.”(Public Law 99‐660)

Why Not Get A Vaccine Shot?

Many doctors and health‐care practitioners do not get vaccinated and do not vaccinate their children. Why not?

  • They know vaccines are not proven to be safe or effective. They know vaccines contain dangerous substances.
  • They know vaccines cause serious health problems
  • They have treated patients with serious side effects from vaccines.
  • The only people who benefit from being healthy are you and those you care about.

A Story Of Corruption

  • Drug companies have infiltrated and seized control over the entire healthcare system, including medical schools, medical journals, hospitals, clinics and the local pharmacy. A doctor’s very livelihood thus depends on blind faith, without questioning any aspect of any vaccination. Even when obvious evidence of vaccine damage occurs right before a doctor’s eyes, s/he is usually unwilling to consider a vaccine as the cause. Though uncorrupt science and medicine support rejection of vaccines, doing so can be considered professional career suicide. The signatories to this document boldly risk this end for the safety of you and your child.
  • Hospitals benefit financially from hospitalizations and tests.
  • Drug companies make billions of dollars from vaccines.
  • Drug companies make tens of billions of dollars from drugs given to treat side effects and life‐time illnesses caused by vaccines.
  • Vaccines are the backbone of the medical system. Without vaccines, healthcare costs would go down because we would have a healthier overall society. We have exchanged chicken pox for autism, flu for asthma, ear infections for diabetes. The list goes on and on. In the zeal to eliminate a short list of relatively benign microbes, we have traded temporary illnesses for pervasive, life‐long diseases, disorders, dysfunctions and disabilities.

How Many Vaccines are There?

  • If U.S. children receive all doses of all vaccines, they are injected with up to 35 shots that contain 113 different kinds of disease particles, 59 different chemicals, four types of animal cells/DNA, human DNA from aborted fetal tissue and human albumin.
  • If you think you don’t have to worry about vaccines because your children are older, think again. There are at least 20 more vaccines currently in the development pipeline for release in the next few years, mostly targeting adolescents and adults.

Some Vaccine Ingredients

How is it possible that vaccines will not be harmful to your health?

  • Stray viruses and bacteria from the animal cell cultures that vaccines are made in.
  • Mercury, a well‐documented neurotoxin, is still in the multi‐dose flu vaccines throughout the world. Trace amounts remain in several other vaccines.
  • Aluminum, a poison that can cause bone, bone marrow and brain degeneration.
  • Animal cells from monkeys, dog kidneys, chickens, cows, and humans.
  • Formaldehyde (embalming fluid), a known carcinogen.
  • Polysorbate 80, known to cause infertility in female mice and testicular atrophy in male mice.
  • Gelatin, from pigs and cows, known to cause anaphylactic reactions, is found in large quantities in the MMR, chickenpox and shingles vaccines.
  • Monosodium glutamate (MSG) in inhaled flu vaccines, is known to cause metabolic disturbances (e.g. diabetes), seizures and other neurologic disorders.

Conflicts of Interest In The Vaccine Industry

  • The same people who make rules and recommendations about vaccination profit from vaccine sales. For example, Dr. Julie Gerberding, who was in charge of the CDC for eight years, is now the President of Merck Vaccines. Dr. Paul Offit, a member of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice(ACIP), developed and patented his own vaccine.
  • According to the CDC, the average U.S. 10‐doctor pediatric group has over $100,000 of vaccine inventory in their office to sell. These doctors make money from office visits and from giving your children vaccines, and also from follow up office visits for assessing reactions.
  • U.S. pediatricians reportedly make quarterly bonuses from the HMOs they work for by maintaining high vaccination rates in their practices and have reportedly been reprimanded by insurance companies if their vaccination rates fall.

Vaccine Research

Is there any research that shows the difference between vaccinated and unvaccinated children?

  • The Cal‐Oregon project sponsored by Generation Rescue surveyed parents of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated U.S. children. Of the 17,674 children included in the survey, the results showed:
  • Vaccinated children had 120% more asthma.
  • Vaccinated boys had 317% more ADHD.
  • Vaccinated boys had 185% more neurologic disorders.
  • Vaccinated boys had 146% more autism.
  • Girls represented only 20% of the total number of children in the survey. To read the full study for yourself, go to www.generationrescue.org/pdf/survey.pdf. To read a report on the low incidence of autism among unvaccinated Amish children go to http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/quick‐compare‐2. More studies on autism are found here http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2009/06/03/japvaxautism/ and here http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2010/02/08/britvaxautism/

Vaccine Exemptions And Options In The U.S

  • You do have the right to refuse. Use it.
  • Your child does not have to be vaccinated to attend public school.
  • Every state has exemptions giving you the right to refuse unwanted vaccines. http://exemptmychild.com/10752
  • Find a healthcare provider who agrees with your choice to not vaccinate and will respect you at www.vaccinationcouncil.org/providers.pdf
  • Many choose health and safety by saying no to vaccines.
  • Groups that generally do not vaccinate include holistic practitioners, chiropractors, parents who home school, and those who belong to certain religions.
  • Thousands of testimonies written by parents of non‐vaccinated children about the state of their children’s robust health are available many places online.
  • Vaccination decisions are between you and your spouse/partner. No one else needs to know. It is not the business of your family members, your neighbors, or your in‐laws.
  • To have vibrant health, you will need to take the initiative to learn some new things. The safe choice is to say no to vaccines. You have control over health choices you make for yourself and your children. You have no control over the outcome of a vaccination.
  • You do not need a pediatrician to simply weigh and measure your child and give shots. Consider a naturopathic doctor, a pediatric chiropractor, a doctor of oriental medicine, or a homeopathic doctor. You may find that family doctors of osteopathic medicine are more open‐minded about vaccine‐free choices. Babies are born with powerful, natural defenses. If this were not so, all would die shortly after birth. Enormous cascades of complex immune processes start with the first cry. This needs to occur naturally, without the interruption caused by the injections of toxic substances.
  • Learn about the “vaccine preventable” diseases. Your children will never come in contact with most of them and if they do, nearly all healthy and unvaccinated children recover uneventfully, with long term immunity. Health cannot come through a needle.
  • Learn about the importance of fever, how to take care of it at home and when it is time to call the doctor. Most fevers resolve on their own, with care and support, in just a few hours. www.drtenpenny.com/fever.aspx
  • Understand that your child can be vaccinated and still contract the illness you are wishing to prevent. Vaccines may not provide the protection that people assume they do. Health cannot come through a needle.
  • Learn that the primary keys to health are good nutrition, pure water, adequate sleep, routine exercise and happiness.
  • Learn some simple information about vitamins, especially the critically important information about vitamin D3. Learn how to use basic herbs and basic homeopathy for health and for addressing minor illnesses.
  • Learn more than your doctor about vaccines. Your medical doctor has probably never read anything about vaccines except drug‐company and CDC‐sponsored publications that support their use.
  • Know that healthcare is something you pay for; sick care is covered by insurance. Your insurance will pay for drugs and vaccines. Budget accordingly to stay healthy. Your life depends on it.

Web Resources On Vaccination

  • International Medical Council on vaccination (free webinars) www.vaccinationcouncil.org
  • Example IMCV regional sites www.imcv‐wi.org, www.imcv‐me.org
  • Dr. Sherri Tenpenny www.drtenpenny.com, Facebook www.facebook.com/vaccineinfo
  • ThinkTwice Global Vaccine Institute www.thinktwice.com
  • Vaccination Liberation www.vaclib.org
  • U.S. doctors who don’t vaccinate www.novaxdoctors.webs.com
  • Holistic Moms www.holisticmoms.org
  • Moms Like Me www.momslikeme.com
  • Books for more information and a place to start
  • Saying No To Vaccines – Sherri Tenpenny, DO
  • Make an Informed Vaccine Decision For the Health of Your Child – Mayer Eisenstein, MD, JD, MPH
  • Vaccines: Are They Really Safe and Effective? – Neil Miller
  • Child Health Guide – Randall Neustaedter
  • Childhood Vaccinations: Questions All Parents Should Ask – Tedd Koren, DC
  • How to Raise a Healthy Child in Spite of Your Doctor – Robert Mendelsohn, MD
  • Jabs, Jenner and Juggernauts – Jennifer Craig, PhD, BSN, MA, Dhom
  • Natural Alternatives to Vaccination – Zoltan Rona, MD
  • The Crime of Vaccination – Tenison Deane, MD
  • The Sanctity of Human Blood: Vaccination is Not Immunization – Tim O’Shea, DC
  • Vaccination – Gerhard Buchwald, MD
  • Vaccination: 100 Years of Orthodox Research – Viera Scheibner, PhD
  • Medical doctors(MD,DO, 4yr ND), Doctors of Chiropractic, health care workers who work in a conventional setting, and holistic practitioners wishing to participate in future versions of this document or who would like to join our group, please send an e‐mail to sayno@vaccinationcouncil.org
  • International Medical Council on Vaccination www.vaccinationcouncil.org www.facebook.com/vaccinationcouncil

Vaccinations, Vaccines

Nations With Most Vaccines Have Worst Infant Mortality Rates

No Comments 22 July 2011


 Worst Infant Mortality Rates

Nations requiring the most vaccines tend to have the worst infant mortality rates

by Neil Z. Miller

A new study, published in Human and Experimental Toxicology (http://het.sagepub.com/content/earl…), a peer-reviewed journal indexed by the National Library of Medicine, found that nations with higher (worse) infant mortality rates tend to give their infants more vaccine doses.

Example Of This Correlation

For example, the United States requires infants to receive 26 vaccines — the most in the world — yet more than six U.S. infants die per every 1000 live births. In contrast, Sweden and Japan administer 12 vaccines to infants, the least amount, and report less than three deaths per 1000 live births.

Infant Mortality Study Protocols

The authors of the study, Neil Z. Miller and Dr. Gary Goldman, conducted a literature review to determine the immunization schedules for the United States and all 33 nations with better infant mortality rates than the United States. The total number of vaccine doses specified for infants aged less than one year was then determined for each country. The 34 nations were then organized into data pairs consisting of total number of vaccine doses specified for their infants and infant mortality rates. A scatter plot of the data pairs provided evidence of a positive correlation: infant mortality rates and vaccine doses tend to increase together.

Nations were also grouped into five different vaccine dose ranges. The mean infant mortality rates of all nations within each group were then calculated. Analysis showed “a high statistically significant correlation between increasing number of vaccine doses and increasing infant mortality rates.”

“Positive” Correlation

It is instructive to note that many developing nations require their infants to receive multiple vaccine doses and have national vaccine coverage rates (a percentage of the target population that has been vaccinated) of 90% or better, yet their infant mortality rates are poor. Infant mortality rates will remain high in nations that cannot provide clean water, proper nutrition, improved sanitation, and better access to health care.

Nations with higher (worse) infant mortality rates give their infants, on average, more vaccine doses. This positive correlation, derived from the data, elicits an important inquiry: Are some infant deaths associated with over-vaccination? Is it possible that some nations are requiring too many vaccines for their infants and the additional vaccines are a toxic burden on their health?

Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS):

There is some evidence that a subset of infants may be more susceptible to SIDS shortly after being vaccinated. For example, Torch found that unvaccinated babies who died of SIDS did so most often in the fall or winter while vaccinated babies died most often at 2 and 4 months — the same ages when initial doses of DPT were given to infants. He concluded that DPT “may be a generally unrecognized major cause of sudden infant and early childhood death, and that the risks of immunization may outweigh its potential benefits.” It appears as though some infant deaths attributed to SIDS may be vaccine related, perhaps associated with biochemical or synergistic toxicity due to over-vaccination.

All nations have an obligation to determine whether their immunization schedules are achieving their desired goals.

You may download the complete study at: http://het.sagepub.com/content/earl…

Funding Acknowledgment: This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Open Access: The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) donated $2500 and Michael Belkin donated $500 (in memory of his daughter, Lyla) for open access to the journal article (making it freely available to all researchers). NVIC is dedicated to preventing vaccine injuries and deaths through public education.
Neil Z. Miller is an independent researcher. He has devoted the last 25 years to educating parents and health practitioners about vaccines, encouraging informed consent and non-mandatory laws. Mr. Miller gives talks on vaccines both locally and nationally. Past organizations that he has lectured for include the International Chiropractic Pediatric Association, the International College of Integrative Medicine, Autism One/Generation Rescue, the Hahnemann Academy of North America, and the University of Virginia. In June 2011, Mr. Miller will be giving a vaccine seminar at Dr. Gabriel Cousens’ Tree of Life Rejuvenation Center. Mr. Miller has a degree in psychology and is a member of Mensa. Contact information:Neil Z. Miller

HEALING US, Vaccinations, Vaccines

Murdoch’s Crimes – Promoting GMO-vaccines for humans

No Comments 18 July 2011

Murdoch's crimes

Murdoch’s Worst Crimes

By William Newton Special to Salem-News.com

“… the evidence of sleazy and scandalous behavior of the Murdoch papers has expanded geometrically.” Michael Collins

 

(LONDON) – Rupert Murdoch’s news empire faces intense media and legal scrutiny.

Current revelations focus on Murdoch’s News of the World hacking into the Dowler family’s voice messages during the kidnapping case their 12 year old daughter Milly, and Murdoch’s London Times’ allegedly having illegally obtained the financial, property and medical information of former UK Labour Party Leader Gordon Brown during the time he was chancellor. BBC – “Gordon Brown ‘targeted’ by Sunday Times” Murdoch’s Last Pillar of Legitimacy Crumbles. A 2010 exposure of Murdoch’s Times of London revealed that it had published forged documents purporting to show that Iran planned to do nuclear experiments for an atomic weapon, and as Michael Collins at Oped News points out, it was Murdoch’s “drumbeat of misinformation” that helped mislead people into believing that Saddam Hussein was involved in the 9/11 attack, supporting Bush’s invasion of Iraq, though intelligence was “unsubstantiated, contradicted, or even non-existent.” Senate Intelligence Committee Unveils Final Phase II Reports on Prewar Iraq Intelligence June 5, 2008

But what has not yet been covered is the media circus Murdoch’s London Times created internationally as it fabricated lies against a respected British doctor, with consequences that could impact the lives of billions of children in the world.

The London Time’s headlines read:

Callous, unethical and dishonest’: Dr Andrew Wakefield

MMR scare doctor Andrew Wakefield makes fortune in US.

Andrew Wakefield MMR – the investigation – by Brian Deer

London Times : MMR doctor Andrew Wakefield ‘abused his position of trust.’

Andrew Wakefield was a respected British gastroenterologist who began research into digestive problems in autistic children in collaboration with other doctors in the UK, after being called by parents seeking help.  His work indicated severe digestive issues and he asked for more investigation of the MMR vaccine.

Brian Deer is the reporter who savaged Dr Wakefield from the pages of the Sunday Times, a paper managed by Rupert Murdoch’s son James Murdoch who is on the board of GlaxoSmithKline which makes the MMR.  Deer researched his case with the help of Medico-Legal Investigations a private enquiry company whose only source of funding is the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry.  Deer was both the  journalist writing on Wakefield and the person to bring a case of fitness to practice medicine to the General Medical Council, and then wrote about the proceedings as well.   Parents whose children were treated by Wakefield were denied the right to be heard before a real court on claims against the vaccine manufacturers.  The High Court judge who denied them was Sir Nigel Davis, whose brother is an executive board member of Elsevier, publishers of the Lancet which removed Wakefield’s paper on the subject, published in 1998, and is on the Board of GlaxoSmithKline.

With the London Times given Brian Deer free reign to attack Wakefield, media closed in like shark.  Coincidentally, the head of Reuters serves on the Board of Merck, and Miriam Stoppard who writes at the Daily Mirror Newspaper is married to Sir Christopher Hogg, who was Chairman of GlaxoSmith Kline un 2004.  Dr Kumar, the Chairman of the GMC Fitness to Practice Panel who ruled against Dr Andrew Wakefield, would not answer questions about his shareholdings in GlaxoSmithKline, and said there was no such thing as vaccine damage as well as saying that any parents who claimed that their children had suffered such, would be treated with scorn and contempt

Wakefield lost his license to practice and left the UK.  What had he done that Murdoch’s machine went into action, creating fictions about him, getting his work pulled from the Lancet, getting him brought before the GMC to ultimately lose his license?  Wakefield suggested that until further studies, that the measles vaccine be given as a separate vaccine rather than in combination as the MMR (measles, Mumps, Rubella).  He did not suggest that children not take a measles vaccine, only that there be caution until the MMR was investigate further. This reasonable suggestion was met immediately by the single measles vaccines being taken off the market.

Wakefield’s work with Professor Walker-Smith and Professor Simon Murch had touched a nerve.  The pharmaceutical industry, an industry that makes 6 times more than any industry on Wall Street is heavily invested in vaccines (in the US, the companies do not have to prove any efficacy to get FDA approval) and is moving on every front to have their product mandated.  To suggest the one of the main vaccines for children might be destroying them mentally and physiologically was a problem, yet the study showed severe digestive system damage and mitochondrial dysfunction.  Mitochondrial dysfunction has been confirmed by other studies but taking down Wakefield in a big way became a means of discrediting anyone questioning vaccines.  Wakefield was cast as a fraud and so all those voicing concerns were dismissed by reference to him.

This documentary gives background and can allow people to judge the credibility of Murdoch’s reporter for themselves.  http://www.naturalnews.tv/v.asp?v=21C9E60E7A00D3D8B3DF37796B661886

To understand how serious all this is, and thus how much is at stake for millions if not billions of children, one need to appreciate how profound it is for mitochondria not to function normally.

“Children with autism are far more likely to have deficits in their ability to produce cellular energy than are typically developing children, a new study by researchers at UC Davis has found. The study, published in theJournal of the American Medical Association(JAMA), found that cumulative damage and oxidative stress in mitochondria, the cell’s energy producer, could influence both the onset and severity of autism, suggesting a strong link between autism and mitochondrial defects.  …. Mitochondria are the primary source of energy production in cells and carry their own set of genetic instructions, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), to carry out aerobic respiration. Dysfunction in mitochondria already is associated with a number of other neurological conditions, including Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, schizophrenia ….”  http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/11/101130161521.htm

Mitochondrial disorders may be caused by mutations, acquired or inherited, in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) or in nuclear genes that code for mitochondrial components. They may also be the result of acquired mitochondrial dysfunction due to adverse effects of drugs, infections, or other environmental causes (see MeSH). … Defects in nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes are associated with hundreds of clinical disease phenotypes including anemia, dementia, hypertension, lymphoma, retinopathy, seizures, and neurodevelopmental disorders.[2]  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_disease#Characteristics

In opening up the issue mitochrondrial dysfunction and urging a shift back to a single measles vaccine (an earlier vaccine), Wakefield may have stumbled onto something explosive.  For the MMR vaccine appears to be the third generation of vaccines, what are called DNA vaccines. They involve shooting genetically engineered material into the body, often using gene guns that were used into the genetic engineering of seeds, in order to achieve DNA “uptake.”

From Wikipedia on DNA Vaccines:

Methods of delivery:

The two most popular approaches are injection of DNA in saline, using a standard hypodermic needle, and gene gun delivery. … Injection in saline is normally conducted intramuscularly (IM) in skeletal muscle, or intradermally (ID), with DNA being delivered to the extracellular spaces. This can be assisted by electroporation[19]; by temporarily damaging muscle fibres with myotoxins such as bupivacaine; or by using hypertonic solutions of saline or sucrose.[2] Immune responses to this method of delivery can be affected by many factors, including needle type,[8] needle alignment, speed of injection, volume of injection, muscle type, and age, sex and physiological condition of the animal being injected.[2]Gene gun delivery, the other commonly used method of delivery, ballistically accelerates plasmid DNA (pDNA) that has been adsorbed onto gold or tungsten microparticles into the target cells, using compressed helium as an accelerant.[2][12]

Alternative delivery methods have included aerosol instillation of naked DNA on mucosal surfaces, such as the nasal and lung mucosa,[12]and topical administration of pDNA to the eye[20] and vaginal mucosa.[12] Mucosal surface delivery has also been achieved using cationic liposome-DNA preparations,[1] biodegradablemicrospheres,[21][12] attenuated Shigella or Listeria vectors for oral administration to the intestinal mucosa,[22] and recombinant [genetically engineered] adenovirus vectors.[12]

The DNA vaccines depend on DNA uptake. However, “[t]his phenomenon has not been the subject of much research, so the actual mechanism of DNA uptake is not known.”

And what is meant by DNA uptake?  Does it mean as it sounds, that genetically engineered material is taken up by the DNA of those being injected with it?  And if so, does that mean that these vaccines are genetically altering (or “engineering”) those receiving the vaccines?

Is it possible that the mitochondrial dysfunction seen in autistic children is a result of their DNA having been compromised?  The new DNA vaccines derive from failed gene therapy.  Are the new DNA vaccines a continuation of experiments in genetic engineering, being conducted on millions of children?

Cloned animals also suffer from mitochondrial dysfunction.

In the cloned animals, mitochondria are transferred to the eggs along with the nucleus from somatic cells, leading to a mixture of mitochondrial genes from egg and the somatic cell from which the nucleus was obtained. This mixture of mitochondria (called heteroplasmy) introduces incompatibility between mitochondrial and nuclear genetic material that contribute to the high rates of abnormalities and deaths among clones and leads to cell and tissue disruption as the cloned animal develops. The impact of mitochondrial dysfunction is great because the mitochondria provide energy for the cells. http://www.i-sis.org.uk/human_milk_from_cloned_transgenic_cattle.php

And It seems that people have already been genetically engineered.  Dr. Joseph Cummins, professor emeritus of biology at the University of Western Ontario, says “It seems likely that the transplants are going on, but very, very quietly in a regulatory vacuum, perhaps.”

Genetically-Engineered Humans. Barritt, Jason A., et al. “Mitochondria in Human Offspring Derived From Ooplasmic Transplantation.” Human Reproduction, 16.3 (2001), pp 513-6. •

“First Cases of Human Germline Genetic Modification Announced.” British Medical Journal 322 (12 May 2001), p 1144. •

“Genetically Modified Human Babies?” Australian Broadcasting Corporation, 8 May 2001. • Hawes, S.M., C. Sapienza, and K. E. Latham.

“Ooplasmic Donation in Humans: The Potential for Epigenic Modifications.” Human Reproduction 17.4 (2002), 850-2. • Hill, Amelia.

“Horror at ‘Three Parent Foetus’ Gene Disorders.” Observer (London), 20 May 2001.

The 23 new DNA vaccines have been linked to autism.  Are the new DNA vaccines altering and/or damaging children’s DNA, the code of life?

An overview of Murdoch’s connections to the pharmaceutical industry/international bankers cannot answer that question but at a minimum suggest serious problems with vaccines with the greatest wealth power in the world behind promoting them, nonetheless.

Lloyd Blankfein is co-chairman with media mogul Rupert Murdoch in the David Rockefeller-founded Partnership for New York City (PFNYC),15 chartered by the Royal Family of England. This group is currently advancing a world leading biotechnology trust, heavily invested in “genetopharmaceuticals” and flu vaccine genetic engineering. [Emphasis added.]Members of this group, along with George Soros-directed assets, virtually monopolized the genetics industry during the 1990s, culminating in the corporate privatization of the Human Genome Project.19

Involvement of these economic leaders in the vaccine industry is most revealing and even shocking as the following facts evidence:

The Baxter Corporation, indicted for spreading HIV contaminated blood products during the late 1970s through the 1980s; a cheap lethal heparin substitute in 2008;21 and H5N1 contaminated seasonal flu vaccines in early 2009,22 was directed by Mr. Tony White, Soros’s appointee to lead the privately owned Applera Company following their obvious heist of the Human Genome Project during the late 1990s. The sudden privatization of what had previously been public, non-profit, patentable property, also implicated co-sponsors–the U.S. Department of Energy and The Wellcome Trust of London.19,

Today, the American Baxter Company is a major H1N1 vaccine maker for European nations, and at the center of controversy concerning the expanding outbreak of recombinant H1N1-hemorrhagic pneumonia. Many experts conclude the 2009 H1N1 triple reassortant sourced from a lab,25 similar to its 1977 relative.

Rupert Murdoch’s mother, Elizabeth, Dame Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire, and daughter-in-law, Sarah Murdoch, steward the Royal Women’s Hospital and Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, respectively, in Australia. They oversaw their staff conduct H1N1 vaccine trials on infants, children, and pregnant women in 2009, collaborating with Merck’s subsidiary, CSL. Furthermore, Rupert Murdoch’s son James oversees GlaxoSmithKline, another major H1N1 vaccine maker. Regarding efficacy, and more importantly safety, the CSL/Merck H1N1 vaccine tested in Murdoch-family directed facilities was simply assumed to be both safe and effective according to its package insert. The new and old vaccine had “no controlled clinical studies demonstrating a decrease in influenza disease after vaccination with” the company’s seasonal flu vaccine, “AFLURIA.” Likewise, vaccine safety was speciously assumed following  assessment days comparing those who received AFLURIA (with or without mercury preservative, confounding everyone’s analysis) with those who received some undisclosed “European-licensed trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine as an active control” This “active control” was preserved with mercury.

In plainer language, an unidentified arguably neurotoxic vaccine served as a “placebo control.” Since no inactive placebo control such as saline was used, the study design was obviously flawed, confounding, biased, and arguably fraudulent. It may have precluded observing statistically significant differences between experimental and control groups falsely evidencing safety from lacking adverse event differentials. This intentional obfuscation exclusively benefited those with conflicting interests, and/or those inclined to rely on safety assurances to the detriment of public health and medical science. Yet, Murdoch-directed News Corp. assets heavily promoted these risky H1N1 vaccines as urgently required, safe and effective.

Curiously, in 2008, The Wellcome Trust of London’s Biocentre, the UK’s largest non-governmental source of funds for biomedical research, created a special grant program to heavily fund research into alleged mysterious neurodegenerative diseases linked by censored science to thimerosal mercury.

The Wellcome Trust’s alleged divestment of conflicting pharmaceutical interests following Burroughs Wellcome’s sale of stock to Glaxo PLC, created GlaxoWellcome, currently GlaxoSmithKlein. This allegation of “divestment” is discredited by more than the fund’s involvement in the Human Genome Project’s pirating, implicating George Soros and David Rockefeller-linked investors. Again, GlaxoSmithKlein makes the H1N1 vaccine, and Rupert Murdoch’s heir apparent, James Murdoch, oversees their Board of Directors.

And that’s not all. . . Rupert Murdoch’s Co-Chairman of the PFNYC, Lloyd Blankfein is a major shareholder in the Goldman-Sachs/AstraZeneca partnership. He directed AstraZeneca’s $15 billion acquisition of MedImmune, the H1N1 FLUMIST maker.

Besides James and Rupert’s News Corp directing film makers Twentieth Century Fox and Warner Brothers, the Western World’s  mass-mediated mind-set is reinforced by PFNYC “partner” and Reuters News Service CEO, Thomas H. Glocer. Glocer sits on the Board of Directors of Merck & Company, whose (CSL) H1N1 vaccine, and (Merck’s) Pneumovax vaccine, is broadening markets as the main ingredient–laboratory engineered H1N1 virus–mutates, as in the Ukraine, becoming more deadly.

Additionally, those poorly-paid inadequately-trained pharmacists administering vaccines in supermarkets, draining doctors’ revenue streams, reflect the “hostile takeover” of clinical medicine by Goldman-Sachs’s limited partner, PFNYC “Corporate Partner,” and world-leading “buyout firm,” Kolberg, Kravitz, Roberts & Company (KKR) This “immunization” industry-altering practice is promoted as a “cost-saving” invention according to KKR’s director of Safeway supermarkets, Steven Burd, founder of the Coalition to Advance Healthcare Reform (CAHR),45 popularly called “Obamacare.”

Whatever the answer to questions about the new DNA vaccines, it is obvious that Rupert Murdoch’s connections to the pharmaceutical industry and vaccines are very deep.  No investigation of Murdoch’s crimes should omit his efforts to use his media empire to prevent exposure of potential dangers from the MMR vaccines and possibly all the new DNA vaccines.


Photos on flickr

Tweets:

© 2012 Healing Talks. Powered by Wordpress.

Wordpress by WooThemes - Premium Wordpress Themes

UA-3915080-1 UA-3915080-1